Dear Joemesh, Your question is indeed an interesting one. Allow me to address it from the perspective of a connoisseur of cowgirl pornography and a portrait-enjoyer.
- It is not the case that all individuals engage in fapping while viewing a 24-inch monitor. Indeed, a significant proportion of us fap with our 6-inch smartphone screens. The practicality of watching porn in portrait mode makes it an ideal format for those of us who fap with a left-hand grip and watch the porn with our left hand while our right hand performs the deed.
- The landscape video is typically viewed on a monitor, which restricts the ability to engage in fap activities in the bedroom or living room. However, the portability of the portrait video allows for viewing on a handheld device, enabling the user to engage in fap activities at any time and in any location. This mobility allows for exploration of unconventional or extreme place that any human being could not think off.
- The portrait video is most effective when it is created as POV content. A comparison can be made between
You must be registered to see the links
and
You must be registered to see the links
. As can be seen, Pyra by Kamuo has empty space on both the left and right sides. In contrast, Chiyuki by Najar has effectively and efficiently used the space of the screen.
- In landscape video in POV mode, the video is prone to be tilted, as evidenced by the following examples:
You must be registered to see the links
,
You must be registered to see the links
,
You must be registered to see the links
. These videos could strain our eyes, potentially leading to adverse effects and strain on our eyes and retina. In contrast, portrait videos produced by the majority of artists would place the girls in action upright, which would fill the smartphone screen and contribute to maintaining our eyesight. This may allow us to watch pornography for longer periods.
- In addition to the preceding point, the portrait video would direct our attention to the subject. While the landscape video sometimes leaves empty space on the left and right sides, the artist is bound to create the environment to be as optimal as possible. It would be distressing for the girls in the porn if we were to admire the environment.
It is possible that the points I have raised may be erroneous, given that not all cases will be identical and there may be exceptions to the rule.
This concludes my presentation. Please feel free to ask questions, make contributions, or offer contrary views.
I would like to express my gratitude to those who have attended my TED talk.
*sips fancy tea* A fellow cowgirl connoisseur, dab me u- I mean *ahem* As we gather amidst the tapestry of ideas woven by the minds of scholars and seekers, let us unfurl the banner of discussion and delve into the depths of our topic.
While your perspective offers a detailed analysis of the practicalities and advantages of portrait mode in certain contexts, it's important to consider a broader range of viewpoints and preferences within the community of pornography consumers and enthusiasts.
Firstly, while some may indeed find portrait mode more convenient for certain activities, such as one-handed viewing, others may prefer landscape mode for its immersive experience and larger viewing area. Preferences can vary widely depending on individual habits, preferences, and technological setups.
Secondly, while you emphasize the benefits of portrait mode for maintaining eye health and focus on the subject, it's worth acknowledging that there's a diverse range of content preferences within the genre. Some viewers may appreciate the environmental context provided by landscape mode, finding it enhances the overall viewing experience rather than detracting from it.
Additionally, the effectiveness of POV content, whether in portrait or landscape mode, can depend heavily on the skill and creativity of the creators. While you provide examples of successful use of space in portrait mode, there are certainly landscape POV videos that are expertly crafted to minimize tilting and maintain viewer engagement.
Ultimately, the diversity of preferences within the community means that what works best for one individual may not necessarily be ideal for another. It's valuable to recognize and respect this diversity of perspectives when discussing the merits of different viewing formats.