- May 25, 2020
- 1,016
- 1,200
Goddammit, what are those fucks trying to ruin now?And once Grainne gets plowed in what I'm told is a rather... 'intense' scene, dependent on execution, I might end up disregarding the entire grove.
Alypia is fitting in just fine with the other dumbasses.Speaking of nothing, we know (some) of the plans regarding that 'less slutty' route. However, this
![]()
A noble lady with a penis you can meet in the Frosthound.Who the fuck is Evelyn again?
Now, I am curios as to what you mean by this.I have a completely different rant on Brienne and the type of player that I think, personally, shouldn't be catered to at all - but that's a much longer conversation so I'll cut it off there.
did you reply to the wrong comment by any chance?Not that i don't get it, but at the same time Skow turned her lesbian and Tobs had her raped. Which make up for two out of three times she was written by other people. That's not writers caring about the characters or other people's work and trying to get it right, it's people actively giving no shits and doing whatever - because (my OC's awesome so let's get her another girlfriend/my OC's better so fuck this cow also i'm out of meds).
Which again, not that you're wrong, would certainly be a lot of pressure and honestly as things stand you're probably right in that anything of the like is best left to Wsan, but as things stand. Had Tobs respected his colleague's work like he does his own then we wouldn't be talking about a rape scene but rather some longwinded Brienne/Kiyoko threesomes.
But, not the reality we live in so i guess Brienne's best left safe in the cow bubble. Which, great bubble but shit's just cartoony. Like great companion in AAA RPG living on their own side of the camp because every other writer is in it for themselves and at any chance might put the dumbest shit in their mouth cartoony (see Etheryn for what happens when everyone's allowed their take - and also her main guy's take changes overtime for reasons).
And doing so would put her in the same place as characters like Arona and Sera, expanding her appeal to people that aren't into doms. Why is this a problem? I hate almonds so all you fuckers who keep buying almond joys are ruining my mounds. Like seriously?Everyone wan
Evelyn as a character is sold to players as a dom. People that like Evelyn like her because she is a dom. Making her a sub would be an entirely different ballpark in terms of appeal-
Excuse me if I'm being dense, this was only very lightly glossed over: Hasn't Sera proven that you can make a sub route to an otherwise dominant character(and have it be their defining trait) and have it work?
If Sera released without her sub route, you'd obviously think that's antithetical to her character right? But we can see with her that you can develop a character's appeal to be more than just if you dominate or submit to them.
Even if a route can be considered antithetical to the character, that can be the ENTIRE reason something is more attractive, no? Role reversal itself can oftentimes be more appealing than having just the one option. I know I for one find the idea of turning the tables on a dommy futa(because no dommy vagina havers lol) very attractive, but that's not really a common option in these games which is pretty sad.
Think we've gotten slightly off track here.And doing so would put her in the same place as characters like Arona and Sera, expanding her appeal to people that aren't into doms. Why is this a problem? I hate almonds so all you fuckers who keep buying almond joys are ruining my mounds. Like seriously?
Always leave 'em wanting more, that's my motto.Now, I am curios as to what you mean by this.
*Throws a stone that says YES*Ok this Eve and Brieanne argument is getting ridiculous especially since both sides are essentially saying the same thing. Guys we all hate when specific fethishes we don't like enter our favorite fetish characters story but kinkshaming each other isn't really doing anything.
Now I'm gonna play Devil's Advocate here and your all gonna stone me when I say it but this is a porn game at the end of the day, a porn game where the main appeal is how open ended it gets hence why it has every tag under the planet. I think a character getting more optional content regardless of whenever you like the fetish or not is a truly good thing, keyword OPTIONAL.
Wherever it's a sub route for Evelyn, a ntr path with Brieanne or a monogamous relationship with Cait. I think coc 2 would be at its best if it allowed the player to truly have the freedom (or the illusion of it) to choose how they want to interact with the characters and fetish content the character has, as long as the OPTIONAL situations makes sense character wise, whats truly the harm in it?
Not even remotely. The discussion, as Skandranon said, was about how some people here act. Rules for thee and not for me. "Brienne shouldn't get rammed by anyone else because that's out of character, but please, please, change x, I don't like them, appeal to meeeee."Ok this Eve and Brieanne argument is getting ridiculous especially since both sides are essentially saying the same thing.
You have to purposefully put her in debt and then buy her, basically enslaving her. And she's still not that "subby." I guess you could make a corrupt character do that here, I don't see any other reasonable way.If Sera released without her sub route, you'd obviously think that's antithetical to her character right?
I brought her up multiple timesExcuse me if I'm being dense, this was only very lightly glossed over: Hasn't Sera proven that you can make a sub route to an otherwise dominant character(and have it be their defining trait) and have it work?
Oh, I'm not opposed to any of those things in principle. I'm up for almost anything. There is, however quite often a LOT of bitching in this thread about certain kinks every time they come up, whether its people complaining about futa, people complaining about NPCxNPC stuff, or people complaining about sub/dom dynamics. SO clearly, not everyone is quite as saintly as I am.Ok this Eve and Brieanne argument is getting ridiculous especially since both sides are essentially saying the same thing. Guys we all hate when specific fethishes we don't like enter our favorite fetish characters story but kinkshaming each other isn't really doing anything.
Now I'm gonna play Devil's Advocate here and your all gonna stone me when I say it but this is a porn game at the end of the day, a porn game where the main appeal is how open ended it gets hence why it has every tag under the planet. I think a character getting more optional content regardless of whenever you like the fetish or not is a truly good thing, keyword OPTIONAL.
Wherever it's a sub route for Evelyn, a ntr path with Brieanne or a monogamous relationship with Cait. I think coc 2 would be at its best if it allowed the player to truly have the freedom (or the illusion of it) to choose how they want to interact with the characters and fetish content the character has, as long as the OPTIONAL situations makes sense character wise, whats truly the harm in it?
I'm still irked my royal scion can't take the Dragon power, but power fantasy bad or something.Brienne pander MC = Good
Evelyn not pander MC = Bad
I treat Evelyn same as Quintilius, ignore their existence
>BUT YOU MISS OUT CONTENT, A DRAGON POWER UP
The dragon power up are not given to me so i don't give a shit
View attachment 2913056
I can't help feeling Garret would just grab his(her) tits and say "niiiice"I, for one, also want Garth and his useless kid to be turned into wolfmamas View attachment 2913062
couldn't agree more.bro I just wanna see my pc suck Evelyn's cock, what more is there to it