Jan 23, 2024
31
66
Even for TiTs its lame as well, u don't really get to roleplay either. Consequences are majorly lacking if any, there is no motivation to follow-through, and the story meanders a lot even by COC standards.
Yeah, it's not as consequential as CoC. I was honestly disappointed that if you leave the cousin to the Dhaal zaibatsu, Feruze would just save them later, I hope they won't repeat this again now that we can leave the cousin to be raped by hyraxes and make some impact. But at least in Tits, you can do evil things and it has weight. Selling and betraying Kara, blow up two planets for fun, become a royal in a planet, turning a police officer into a bimbo, assisting in sex slavery, kidnapping natives for experiments. Leave the korgonne to be enslaved for life, stealing from and destroying a whole native for money. CoC 2 force you to be a good guy regardless of your corruption level.

Also, in TITS, you can break and corrupt NPCs. Sera, Vahn, Lund, Delilah, and raping golden myrs. You can also cuck people in tits.
 
Last edited:

YouShallNotLol

Well-Known Member
May 6, 2022
1,834
4,123
I feel like NPCs overshadowing the MC and not really being corruptible/ influencable outside of sub/dom dynamics is because of them being essentially commision pieces placed into the game, with their original creators having the final say in what can and cannot be done to them. And a loooooooot of them are against any kind of meddling with their concepts or corrupting them
It's not exclusive to CoC2, sadly. Akbal from original CoC was an example of someone's precious OC. Where your only option is to get raped or to leave.
 

Alterism

Member
Feb 17, 2019
436
2,432
It's not exclusive to CoC2, sadly. Akbal from original CoC was an example of someone's precious OC. Where your only option is to get raped or to leave.
It wasn't (that) bad. You could submit to Akbal a bunch and get two bad perks. But you could also just win in a fight and sodomize him. Obviously he's not down for peaceful PC surrender after that, the prude.

CoCX has a new quest thing where he eventually gets depowered and turned into a house cat. Can even give him a cat name.
 

AkaJack

New Member
Feb 24, 2020
11
11
I don't like the billionth centaur futa OC that we got but she's a commission from someone who also visits f95 every now and then. I think y'all are being a bit much.

It's not the commissioner's fault that SavCo can't organize a patch to have more than 1 thing in it.
Never knew the character was a commission. Whoever is paying for Kalysea to get new content is a legend in my books. Kalysea, Orlaith and Mara. I don't need to say more
 

Tsubuhaza

Member
Sep 28, 2020
194
743
I feel like NPCs overshadowing the MC and not really being corruptible/ influencable outside of sub/dom dynamics is because of them being essentially commision pieces placed into the game, with their original creators having the final say in what can and cannot be done to them. And a loooooooot of them are against any kind of meddling with their concepts or corrupting them
...Well, fuck, that's the origin of the problem then.

Savin and company made a game where the cast consists ostensibly of paid cameo characters and writer's pets. No wonder you can't do shit.

CoCX has a new quest thing where he eventually gets depowered and turned into a house cat. Can even give him a cat name.
Ah, nice, now I gotta try it out. Kept beating the fucker every time, might as well.

Enough a reason to come back, something the player can actually do without being bothered by the one random person that paid for that character.
 

ChubbyFatBoy

Newbie
Aug 19, 2024
84
365
It is a truly shocking and completely surprising revelation. The likes of which no one in the multiverse could've ever seen coming. That filling up a game with a bunch of different OCs, from different people. Would lead to restrictions in what can and can't be done. With watered down and/or fuck the actual MC situations. Because said people are anal and protective over their precious babies. Who are the true MCs in their eyes. Even in a game about sex, violence, "corruption," and the forceful taking of the butt butt, among other orifices.

I ask you, WHO COULD'VE PREDICTED THIS?!?!
 

Belphegor007

Active Member
Aug 23, 2016
970
2,083
It is a truly shocking and completely surprising revelation. The likes of which no one in the multiverse could've ever seen coming. That filling up a game with a bunch of different OCs, from different people. Would lead to restrictions in what can and can't be done. With watered down and/or fuck the actual MC situations. Because said people are anal and protective over their precious babies. Who are the true MCs in their eyes. Even in a game about sex, violence, "corruption," and the forceful taking of the butt butt, among other orifices.

I ask you, WHO COULD'VE PREDICTED THIS?!?!
Do they not have a clause that allows them to do what they want with a character regardless of what the original creators wants?
They did that with Berwyn and despite getting shit on Savin unironically does deserve the ability to utilize characters in his game after said creator leaves.
It's a game at the end of the day and more importantly a product being sold to people so the devs do need the ability to actually make a cohesive and fun experience for the user.
Savin and co already had enough trouble not pissing off everyone without having their hands tied behind their back.

Defending Savin is making me sick.
 

Yeppers34

Member
Aug 11, 2021
355
1,480
Do they not have a clause that allows them to do what they want with a character regardless of what the original creators wants?
They did that with Berwyn and despite getting shit on Savin unironically does deserve the ability to utilize characters in his game after said creator leaves.
It's a game at the end of the day and more importantly a product being sold to people so the devs do need the ability to actually make a cohesive and fun experience for the user.
Savin and co already had enough trouble not pissing off everyone without having their hands tied behind their back.

Defending Savin is making me sick.
I kinda tried to look around for their commissions policy but couldn't really find anything either on the forum or their website (maybe I didn't look hard enough). So I'm guessing any commissioned character only gets updated when the person who commissioned it requests it. Otherwise they just become another one off character.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GokutheG

Skandranon

Well-Known Member
Nov 28, 2016
1,444
3,236
Do they not have a clause that allows them to do what they want with a character regardless of what the original creators wants?
Yep, it's in their list of rules.

It's why they're currently handing out all of Bubble's old projects, why the frost pup is getting a new scene, etc.
 

harem.king

Engaged Member
Aug 16, 2023
3,544
6,095
I feel like NPCs overshadowing the MC and not really being corruptible/ influencable outside of sub/dom dynamics is because of them being essentially commision pieces placed into the game, with their original creators having the final say in what can and cannot be done to them. And a loooooooot of them are against any kind of meddling with their concepts or corrupting them
Which is funny because fenoxo claimed, when he first ended coc, that the reason he is ending it is because he made the mistake of being to generous on the license he gave content creators. such anyone who submits an NPC is the sole owner of said NPC and they can't do anything to said NPC without permission from the owner. even though a bunch of such owners disappeared on them.
He claimed that in tits he would fix it such that he would be allowed to do whatever he wants to the characters.

To be fair though, regardless of license, the whales who are literally paying hundreds of dollars to have their precious OC DONUT STEEL fursona added to the game are not going to keep throwing money their way if they make changes without permissions.
Their fursona is a dommy 8 foot tall futa with a 2 foot long penis who ONLY puts the penis in the MC while being domme and nothing else. No you can't corrupt their fursona, no you cannot turn things around, no you cannot dedick them. That will upset the donor who paid for their fursona to be added to the game or the writer for whom it is a self insert.
 

thecatcameback

Active Member
Oct 10, 2021
520
1,808
If you put the condition that you can't make the OCs super special and invincible then there wouldn't have any takers for any of these games. No one would ever volunteer to write. Maybe Williams would bite. Then they would still bully him and keep him from releasing the stuff he really likes, despite being the only writer.
 

ChubbyFatBoy

Newbie
Aug 19, 2024
84
365
Do they not have a clause that allows them to do what they want with a character regardless of what the original creators wants?
They did that with Berwyn and despite getting shit on Savin unironically does deserve the ability to utilize characters in his game after said creator leaves.
It's a game at the end of the day and more importantly a product being sold to people so the devs do need the ability to actually make a cohesive and fun experience for the user.
Savin and co already had enough trouble not pissing off everyone without having their hands tied behind their back.

Defending Savin is making me sick.
Even if they had that type of arrangement. I imagine if you stick a couple extra funbucks up their asses. Or tickle their balls while whispering sweet nothings in their ear. You could either protect or at least soften whatever depraved fuckery they would inflict on your characters. Then again, isn't a lot of the asshattery in this game. Involving the OCs of the writers themselves? Them having control over everyone else's virgin asses. Doesn't hamper them from cucking you personally.
 
2.80 star(s) 111 Votes