- May 25, 2020
- 454
- 2,611
The judicial process is utterly irrelevant to the discussionBecause it stems from a negative origin, the victim being held against their will. Just because the victim has justified their treatment in their own mind it doesn't erase the wrongdoing of the perpetrator and can serve as a barrier to the judicial process. In much the same way that battered spouses often refuse to testify against their abusers.
1. Appeal to authority fallacy, ad hominem fallacy, appeal to ridicule fallacy. A+ response.Regardless of your feelings about the DSM-5, it remains the foremost important tool available in the field of psychology. It is far from perfect, but that is why it has multiple iterations. As understanding of the human psyche grows, so does the DSM. Let me guess, you also believe that fluoride is put in the water because Stalin and Hitler did because they believed it would make prisoners more docile?
Also, battered spouse syndrome is not recognized by the DSM. It's labeled as PTSD.
wikipedia said:TheYou must be registered to see the linksis widely used as the "classification system for psychological disorders" by theYou must be registered to see the links.You must be registered to see the linksStockholm syndrome has not historically appeared in the manual, as many believe it falls underYou must be registered to see the linksorYou must be registered to see the links(PTSD) and there is no consensus about the correct clarification. In addition, there is no extensive body of research or consensus to help solve the argument,You must be registered to see the linksalthough before the fifth edition (DSM 5) was released, Stockholm syndrome was under consideration to be included under 'Disorders of Extreme Stress, Not Otherwise Specified'.You must be registered to see the linksThe work was updated in 2013, but Stockholm syndrome was not present.You must be registered to see the links
Not sure if there is anything more besides upcoming Berwyn expansion and Jstar Kitsune, but I am currently working on male NPC. Close to 6000 words in, 1/3 done.I question when they think of adding some content for some male partner at this point even content from berwyn I accept and I'm almost about to cross the line and beg that I even need to write it tobs the content
at least there is some hopeNot sure if there is anything more besides upcoming Berwyn expansion and Jstar Kitsune, but I am currently working on male NPC. Close to 6000 words in, 1/3 done.
They probably haven't experienced removing their own body parts yet.You guys are over here talking about whether Kas can actually love and I'm just here wondering why the Dullahan doesn't have a stealth sex scene where she blows you under an inn table by using just her head.
![]()
I don't think Atugia is into oral,but i do think she's into getting bang while she watches and/or her head is separated from her bodyYou guys are over here talking about whether Kas can actually love and I'm just here wondering why the Dullahan doesn't have a stealth sex scene where she blows you under an inn table by using just her head.
![]()
clothing wise I don't they have anything like that planned,but there is suppose to be Berwyn transformed into girl/lady/woman content in the futureInteresting take do you think this could happen to future party members later?
Damn, TOBS actually wrote something worthwhile for once.You must be registered to see the links
Did everyone forget about the bad end in this quest? Regardless how of "canon" bad ends are supposed to be it feels a bit silly to say this isn't compelling evidence. I mean she just flat out admits to it here.
> We wrote it
There's literally a bad end where your character somehow ends up being the MC from Skyrim in the wagon at the beginning of the game.OK but surely "bad ends aren't canon" means that the events of bad ends don't and won't impact the game world. What it doesn't mean (or at least shouldn't mean) is that characterization gets thrown out the window, or that anything can happen and it doesn't matter.
E.g. a bad end can show Hawkthorne getting destroyed, but it won't stick past the game-over screen: Hawkthorne being destroyed is not canon. However, you couldn't have Master Chief from Halo show up in a bad end, or you wouldn't suddenly see Cait randomly renounce her oath and swear monogamy to the PC (unless she got mind-controlled or something), because those things don't make sense with regards to the rules of the world, or the characterization of Cait. Even in a non-canonical bad end, those examples would just be nonsensical.
OK well I stand correct, but in return that shows me these writers are idiots on a magnitude I didn't imagine possible.There's literally a bad end where your character somehow ends up being the MC from Skyrim in the wagon at the beginning of the game.
They totally will do those kinds of things.
Eh, joke endings in video games aren't exactly new.OK well I stand correct, but in return that shows me these writers are idiots on a magnitude I didn't imagine possible.