- Sep 30, 2017
- 24
- 44
I never said I was an authority, but kinky or not, nothing in the game made me think they would have willingly chosen to have sex with the creatures, especially when many of them are outright aggressive against them. It just seems awfully convenient that this character has no problem with having sex with a bunch of monsters (many of which would likely look and feel pretty grotesque). They might be gentle, but am I really suppose to believe they would remain so if she were to struggle. Personally I think the idea of trying to push the morality of humans onto different species that likely haven't encountered many if any humans like that to be a bit silly because I don't expect them to have that kind of understanding of things like consent. A human may do things that they feel is right or wrong, but most animals do things for survival or base pleasure.No offense, but what exactly makes you think you're an authority on my character? Alicia's a kinky bitch even without the planet's influence. And if you haven't noticed, the majority of creatures on the planet are a lot more gentle sexually than you might expect, and they typically end up pleasuring Alicia as much as themselves, a fact which you can clearly see in any of the CGs, meaning they're not purely out there to ravage and rape and give nothing in return. Maybe there's more to it than you think there is and you shouldn't try to speak hypotheticals about a game you aren't involved with in any way?
Like I said, I get I get the appeal of this too. But the change comes across as an unnecessary "excuse". The aphrodisiac in this sense seems like added security for it. But rather than helps, imo it breaks it apart. If one tries to apply any real world scrutiny to it it would fall apart. On the other hand, if one's reason for it is that it's what they like in their porn, then there is no problem because it's fiction. It's entirely possible to conjure up a world where this is seen as not so bad, as okay, or even good. Maybe the character really does have no problem having sex with monsters. But it's a bit like when people justify pokemon battles with logic like "they like to fight", or "it doesn't hurt them. The player knows that in this fictional world, that may work, but also that if they were to apply real world logic to it, you really couldn't justify it. It doesn't harm their enjoyment of the titles, if anything it's just kind of funny to think about because it is fiction.
Note that I am not necessarily saying that this has an effect on one's enjoyment of the game, merely that I see the sex as depicted in the game to be a lighter representation of rape as opposed to consentual sex or a darker representation. My previous post was more in response to the idea that these darker representations are trying to be too serious when honestly if they were they would be actively trying to be at least more accurate and would likely guilt trip you. An example of a more serious depiction would be a character that the player may have come to care about or will come to care about getting raped and the player seeing the negative effects it has on them. Most of the darker representations are still difficult to take seriously though. The character gets raped, often in ways that would likely kill them or at least seriously harm them, and then they walk away, at most taking a moment to rest. Worst comes to worst, the game rewinds time and it never happened.