Did not mean to start (or fuel) a polemic, but when I made irony about the "feminine solidarity" idea, I was talking by practical experience of real life.
The idea that women cannot think and express ideas that even beyond "objectification", "machism", "mysoginy", etc., including wishing or wanting another woman to get hurt (and even acting so that it happens) and enjoying it (whether for competition dislking of the invidual, a form of sadism, etc.) is a myth, even if in theory the ones that fit are not the majority.
In reality "Hell hath no fury..." does not apply only to the interaction men-women, and the "scorned" can be in many ways, even if it was originally meant as applying to love (well, apparently the real phrase was "Heaven has no rage like love to hatred turned, nor hell a fury like a woman scorned"), though admittedly in my experience, it does hold true for love (or even just if they offer the physical practice and feel rejected).
I did meet in real life more than once women that were definitively supporting views that I dislike even in a man - e.g. if someone took advantage of a situation with another girl, it was by definition because that girl was easy and a slut and was her fault and the guy was right to take advantage, but the same situation to her by the same person, it was because she was tricked and was the guy to blame.
And we are not talking about "retrograde third world low class ignorant" people, as some stereotypes would want. I am talking about "first World", Western societies, people with degrees and supposedlyl high culture, international exchange experience already as students, even very open to e.g. different sexual orientations.
So, trying to say that "no woman would ever say that" does not fly with me, unless it is something like "I have a penis"
(well, a transexual could also say that, but a transexual does the operation also exactly to feel and try being considered fully as a male, AFAIK).
At the same time, I do not have to convince anybody
, I never met myself DL, so, everybody should feel free to decide what sex they think DL is (included the whole LGBTQIA+ sequence, I don't know it they have already added up some more letters).
The most important thing is deciding if they like what DL does, the speed at which is delivered, and if based on these two factors and their economic capability, they can/want or not to sponsor DL
, not debating the sex of DL (who is not an angel , but the debate starts to sound a bit like the debate about sex of angels :-D).
