ID 5 cover is related to ID8-9,so dont expect that this cover hints what would happend in ID10.It won subs cover idea competition,it isnt only Daval idea.
Exhibit A (All illegal imagery has been removed beforehand):He used the place (inside cinema) on his VIP story. But the idea is not recycle and did not originate from him. It was the idea from subs who won on his cover photo concept contest.
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content.
Log in or register now.
It's isn't just the image that drew the immediate comparison. I don't expect Daval to change 3D sets that probably take a huge amount of effort into creating. And while Pascal68 posted a picture of the comic to which I made reference, tyronemy also aptly pointed out that Unexpected Moments also featured the same theater. And while I agree that the covers don't necessarily indicate what's going to happen in I.D. I think that the mere creation of this image, even if it was voted upon, was Daval's employing the "power of suggestion."
It's also the terrible dialogue that's very reminiscent of his alias's "tone," for lack of a better term. Here are some examples of the two works identical tone especially with respect to ID's latest chapter:
Exhibit B (All illegal dialogue was removed beforehand):
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content.
Log in or register now.
Not only are the works similar in theme, but similar in tone. Perhaps I'm overthinking it, and I sincerely hope I am. With that said, I don't believe in coincidence. Or perhaps, this is the extent of Daval's literary creativity. (I don't mean to insult him, but the writing reads like that of a 17 year-old male who just started watching pornography.) With that said, when I refer to things as "recycled," I'm almost always referring to more than just the imagery. As Exhibit B demonstrates, even the dialogue is vapidly identical. Even with Uncle Peter's obnoxious dialogue in Chapter 6 of VIP Madness: Together when he was giving Sarah a workout and unnecessarily and uncharacteristically berating her, he never called her a "bitch" or "a slut" (?,) much less out loud. And maybe others can speak to the content of Satisfying Needs, as I still haven't read through all or even most of it, but I would be hard-pressed to believe that Liam would refer to his mother, much less Alexa, as a bitch, whore, or slut. So why is Daniel doing it? Why is his dialogue suddenly reading more like a "DirDogma" character than a "Daval" character. Perhaps, I need a break. I've been reading this stuff too much. I normally wouldn't login during the weekends, but this was going to gnaw at me until I posted it, so here it is.
I hope so, too. I also like your idea of how Sharon might find out.I hope that it will not be as voyeuristic, i think that at most they will grope eachother once it gets dark or he’ll finger her etc. but hopefully not a full on sex with the randoms cheering for him lmao. My pitch is that maybe when the movie ends and he kisses her, it would be revealed Sharon with friend were in the room and got to see it and confront them.