Comics Collection Pinup Daval3D Collection [2025-05-05] [Daval3D]

[Small-pp-22]

Man, I wish I can read Russian too, that page also has Nandof and Lucius Logan comics that are totally outdated everywhere else.

Which page?

 

[8TB]

I know ppl are gonna disagree w me, since a lot are taking ID as romcom where the two of them are destined to be, but i was thinking given the fact that Sophia is gonna blackmail them into Daniel fucking her otherwise she’ll tell, that Lana would get jealous as usual and as the time goes and Sophia keeps getting the d, some neighbor son would seduce her, cuz i mean it’s Lana and her being left out first by husband then with seemingly Daniel that it would put her jealous side to another use

It's not just people who disagree with you, it's Daval himself as well:

Any of the alternatives sofia would discover the secret and that would start a stage where Daniel and Lana solve that problem together. that's my intention. I'm not going to add Sofia to the relationship, Sofia is not going to blackmail them for sex. I won't create orgies, Lana won't fuck Uncle Peter NO! NO! NO! none of that will happen and I have to explain that because some subs think I will do all those things. Sofia will not start to be important to the plot, in fact she will not appear much more. that was my idea but some subs think that now Sofia will be the new protagonist.

This is my comic and I know it.

If anything Daval has described the opposite of what you've stated. I understand the fetish for polyamory, but none of the scenarios you've described logically extends the narratives and themes we've seen thus far.

 

[Travaruz]

It's not just people who disagree with you, it's Daval himself as well:



If anything Daval has described the opposite of what you've stated. I understand the fetish for polyamory, but none of the scenarios you've described logically extends the narratives and themes we've seen thus far.

Wouldn’t be the first time daval contradicted himself, i mean logic is not really a thing or the reason why people read these type of stories to begin with plus after this jealous arc or call it what you will, it could strengthen their relationship since they would come back to each other cuz they’re obviously the endgame whatever happens along the way, it’s only a matter of good writing, it would be a change of pace, now with Lana openly expressing her feelings and them being caught the only things to come are like dad finding out or sum butt stuff etc. but nothing of major importance.

 

[Travaruz]

Of course is not going to happen but following your idea how about Rose son debuting with that role and she gets jealous of Lana I think she needs a purpose on the story so why not another mom son drama, or maybe the 2 young fellas from chapter 1 since they are unhinged af.

The romcom mentality is in Pegasus Smith Au Naturel too, Im not a fan of it tbh because takes away so many possibilities.

Did we even see Rose‘s son? I honestly can’t remember, speaking of those guys from chapter 1 i would rather not see them again cuz they look like 8 year olds so if the son is ti make debut it would be cool to at least make him similar to Daniel in age category, i mean Au Naturel is a thing of its own lmao i’m not talking about nudist orgies just that it would make sense for Lana to feel lonely and jealous again which would leave her vulnerable to lust. But a Rose is a good idea nonethless.

 

[8TB]

Wouldn’t be the first time daval contradicted himself,

Fair enough.

i mean logic is not really a thing or the reason why people read these type of stories to begin with

I never suggested that it was. But proposing scenarios just for the sake of proposing scenarios without much if any consideration to what's happened before not only makes no sense but also isn't the reason people read this type of material, either. What if I were to suggest a scenario where Lana gets her nipples and clitoris pierced, gets a sleeve tattoo, dyes her hair to a midtone saffron, and has Daniel fist her in her ass, while she straddles and mounts a puppy they just bought?

How does the scenario you described make any more sense than mine? We know in chapter 8, Daniel refused a blowjob from Sofia because he was upset that his mother was having sex with his father. We knew that the only reason he even touched Sofia was to make his mother jealous. We know that Lana and Sofia are friends. With all that under consideration, how would it make sense that Sofia would blackmail Lana and Daniel, because apparently Daniel's dick is more important to Sofia than Lana's friendship, have sex with Daniel and become the priority of all his attention because Sofia is without question more attractive than Lana, and then drive Lana into the arms of someone else's son, because it was so easy to get her to accept a physical relationship with her own son, just because...?

plus after this jealous arc or call it what you will, it could strengthen their relationship since they would come back to each other cuz they’re obviously the endgame whatever happens along the way, it’s only a matter of good writing, it would be a change of pace,

It wouldn't be a "change of pace;" It would just be a change that serves as a large "F You" to everything that has happened up to this point. Why not just come out and state, "I personally think the mother/son angle in Immoral Desires has ran its course, and I'd like to see Lana and Daniel have different sexual partners?" Why attempt to shoehorn nonsensical scenarios?

now with Lana openly expressing her feelings and them being caught the only things to come are like dad finding out or sum butt stuff etc. but nothing of major importance.

Because Lana can always fall back on the fact that she's drunk. Or Daval can have Lana completely submit to Daniel. If the covers are any indication of what's to come, then on the Chapter 9 cover, we see Lana take off her ring. I can see Daval dragging this on for a few more chapters. And when Lana and Daniel have ran their course, the popularity of which after 10 chapters, doesn't seem to be dying down, then why not just end the story? Why have them have sex with others? This is no indictment on your personal preferences, but more so with Daval's technique of inventing stories along the way. At a certain point, the female characters become nothing more than pornstar facsimiles who have sex just for the sake of having sex.

 

[_OBLIVION_]

Did we even see Rose‘s son? I honestly can’t remember, speaking of those guys from chapter 1 i would rather not see them again cuz they look like 8 year olds so if the son is ti make debut it would be cool to at least make him similar to Daniel in age category, i mean Au Naturel is a thing of its own lmao i’m not talking about nudist orgies just that it would make sense for Lana to feel lonely and jealous again which would leave her vulnerable to lust. But a Rose is a good idea nonethless.

No we only know about his existence thats why I said debuting.

I get your point about the 2 fellas from chapter 1 but Daval didnt have any problem using them so.

Au Naturel is suppose to be the land of free will with swingers everywhere without any ntr but subscribers are treating Brandi and Dylan the main characters as a couple without letting her to fuck anyone else but Dylan can lol it doesn't make sense.

I want to see Rose having sex scenes, shes getting snub for no reason.

 

[8TB]

I want to see Rose having sex scenes, shes getting snub for no reason.

So is Martha, for that matter. Outside of the blowjobs she gives to both her nephew and his friend in chapter one, we don't see Martha in much action. And this gives credence to my working theory that Immoral Desires was never supposed to be about Daniel and Lana; I honestly believe/assume that it was going to be about Martha, Sofia, Rosa, and Lana becoming sexually frustrated cougars who seek relief from "young men." But after Daniel's introduction, Lana and Daniel's pairing took a life of its own, and now, here we are.


I'd like to see Rosa, too, but with her own son, or nephew, or uncle, or brother...

 

[_OBLIVION_]

So is Martha, for that matter. Outside of the blowjobs she gives to both her nephew and his friend in chapter one, we don't see Martha in much action. And this gives credence to my working theory that Immoral Desires was never supposed to be about Daniel and Lana; I honestly believe/assume that it was going to be about Martha, Sofia, Rosa, and Lana becoming sexually frustrated cougars who seek relief from "young men." But after Daniel's introduction, Lana and Daniel's pairing took a life of its own, and now, here we are.


I'd like to see Rosa, too, but with her own son, or nephew, or uncle, or brother...

Yeah Martha too for sure btw that fella she sucked off is her husband nephew not hers, Rosa enjoyed watching Sofia and Martha sucking dick so why not create a arc with her son.

I agree that all those milfs were suppose to be fucked by the same young men, no wonder why they all look like lost in the plot thats a shame.

 

[8TB]

Yeah Martha too for sure btw that fella she sucked off is her husband nephew not hers,

Luke isn't David's uncle? Alice isn't Luke's niece? Maybe you're trying to clarify that they're not blood-related (I was aware of that bit already) but they're still aunt and nephew, albeit not blood-related.

Rosa enjoyed watching Sofia and Martha sucking dick so why not create a arc with her son.

I, too, would like to see Rosa in some action with her son. Maybe a spin-off comic featuring Sofia, Rosa, and Martha, though the little I see of Martha, the better.

I agree that all those milfs were suppose to be fucked by the same young men, no wonder why they all look like lost in the plot thats a shame.

That early plot point in Immoral Desires chapter one, I'd consider a one-off. All it would appear to be now was what ignited Sofia and Lana's "curiosity" about affairs. Those horses have long since left the barn.

 

[_OBLIVION_]

Luke isn't David's uncle? Alice isn't Luke's niece? Maybe you're trying to clarify that they're not blood-related (I was aware of that bit already) but they're still aunt and nephew, albeit not blood-related.

Martha said that little fella is her husband nephew not hers directly on chapter 1 so yeah no blood related, look View attachment 5.webp

 

[8TB]

Martha said that little fella is her husband nephew not hers directly on chapter 1 so yeah no blood related, look View attachment 4254420

nephew
noun

a son of your sister or brother, or a son of the sister or brother of your husband or wife.

Martha doesn't state that it's his nephew, not hers, only that it was his (her husband's) nephew. Rosa on the very next page, states "One of your nephews? Really? On your side of the family or his? Aren't they quite young still?"

Spoiler

You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.

Whether Martha refers to him as her nephew or not is of no consequence. He's the male offspring of her sister-in-law, making him her nephew. I also knew they weren't blood related because of pages five and six. I'm stating that they're aunt and nephew not in the same way that Sarah and David are, as Sarah is David's mother's sister; I'm saying that they're aunt and nephew in the same way the Japanese would call, "inseki."

 

[Parilto]

LANA DESERVE A OLD MAN HARD DICK

I found out that Uncle Peter is her father. It will be pure anal

 

[_OBLIVION_]

nephew
noun

a son of your sister or brother, or a son of the sister or brother of your husband or wife.

Martha doesn't state that it's his nephew, not hers, only that it was his (her husband's) nephew. Rosa on the very next page, states "One of your nephews? Really? On your side of the family or his? Aren't they quite young still?"

Spoiler

You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.

Whether Martha refers to him as her nephew or not is of no consequence. He's the male offspring of her sister-in-law, making him her nephew. I also knew they weren't blood related because of pages five and six. I'm stating that they're aunt and nephew not in the same way that Sarah and David are, as Sarah is David's mother's sister; I'm saying that they're aunt and nephew in the same way the Japanese would call, "inseki."

Exactly, her husband nephew (by blood) just like Sarah and David for example that's my point.

She said clearly on that pic Steves sister son.

 

[8TB]

Exactly, her husband nephew (by blood) just like Sarah and David for example that's my point.

She said clearly on that pic Steves sister son.

So what's the argument, here? The only way they can be "aunt and nephew" is if they're blood related? If that's not the case, then is there really a reason to state parenthetically that they're not blood related? Would it be more apropos to refer to him as her "nephew-in-law"? That distinction isn't usually made when it comes to Uncles, Aunts, Nephews, and Nieces, the same way it is done for Fathers, Mothers, Sons, and Daughters.

 

[_OBLIVION_]

So what's the argument, here? The only way they can be "aunt and nephew" is if they're blood related? If that's not the case, then is there really a reason to state parenthetically that they're not blood related? Would it be more apropos to refer to him as her "nephew-in-law"? That distinction isn't usually made when it comes to Uncles, Aunts, Nephews, and Nieces, the same way it is done for Fathers, Mothers, Sons, and Daughters.

Nephew-in-law is the proper way to say it in this case, blood related and not blood related (Marthas case) is a huge difference.

 

[8TB]

Nephew-in-law is the proper way to say it in this case, blood related and not blood related (Marthas case) is a huge difference.

"Nephew-in-law" is not a common idiom since the term "Nephew" already includes for both blood-related and non blood-related relatives. For example, one of my cousins' mother, who isn't related to me by blood, refers to me as her nephew and I refer to her as my aunt, specifically "ma tante," which is French for aunt. If the qualification is necessary, then the distinction can be made if asked. But both you and I knew that Martha wasn't related to her nephew by blood. When I referred to her giving her nephew a blowjob, I'm using the term nephew the way I've always used it, and the way that it has been defined for centuries, which is the male child of a sibling, or the male child of a spouse's sibling. The act she performed would still be "incestuous" which is a reference to family, even if they don't share "consanguinity."

 

[_OBLIVION_]

"Nephew-in-law" is not a common idiom since the term "Nephew" already includes for both blood-related and non blood-related relatives. For example, one of my cousins' mother, who isn't related to me by blood, refers to me as her nephew and I refer to her as my aunt, specifically "ma tante," which is French for aunt. If the qualification is necessary, then the distinction can be made if asked. But both you and I knew that Martha wasn't related to her nephew by blood. When I referred to her giving her nephew a blowjob, I'm using the term nephew the way I've always used it, and the way that it has been defined for centuries, which is the male child of a sibling, or the male child of a spouse's sibling. The act she performed would still be "incestuous" which is a reference to family, even if they don't share "consanguinity."

My point was from the beginning that little fella aint Martha nephew by blood thats it .

Nephew-in-law is not use in the common idiom I know that but thats the correct terminology.

 

[8TB]

My point was from the beginning that little fella aint Martha nephew by blood thats it .

Nephew-in-law is not use in the common idiom I know that but thats the correct terminology.

The correct terminology is "nephew." That's my point. Nephew includes for circumstances where the aunt/uncle is related to him by blood or not. You can look up the definition. I even provided it for you above. When I stated that Martha gave her nephew a blowjob, it would mean either that she gave her sibling's son a blowjob, or that she gave her spouse's sibling's son a blowjob. What happened in chapter one between Martha and John satisfies that criteria. The more apt use of the term "nephew-in-law" would apply to Luke and Uncle Peter. Sarah is his blood-related niece, and Luke is her husband, making him Uncle Peter's "nephew-in-law." If we're going by the dialogue in that chapter, Rosa took it to mean the same thing that I did, when she states to Martha, "one of YOUR nephews." The only difference is, Rosa made sure to inquire as to whether or not his being her nephew stemmed from being part of her side of the family or her husband's. And that just furthers my point, that nephew can include for both your side of the family and your spouse's.

If there's any questions as to their blood relation, then that can be clarified after the fact. The term nephew doesn't necessitate a modifier which includes the distinction since said term is already inclusive.

 

[_OBLIVION_]

The correct terminology is "nephew." That's my point. Nephew includes for circumstances where the aunt/uncle is related to him by blood or not. You can look up the definition. I even provided it for you above. When I stated that Martha gave her nephew a blowjob, it would mean either that she gave her sibling's son a blowjob, or that she gave her spouse's sibling's son a blowjob. What happened in chapter one between Martha and John satisfies that criteria. The more apt use of the term "nephew-in-law" would apply to Luke and Uncle Peter. Sarah is his blood-related niece, and Luke is her husband, making him Uncle Peter's "nephew-in-law." If we're going by the dialogue in that chapter, Rosa took it to mean the same thing that I did, when she states to Martha, "one of YOUR nephews." The only difference is, Rosa made sure to inquire as to whether or not his being her nephew stemmed from being part of her side of the family or her husband's. And that just furthers my point, that nephew can include for both your side of the family and your spouse's.

If there's any questions as to their blood relation, then that can be clarified after the fact. The term nephew doesn't necessitate a modifier which includes the distinction since said term is already inclusive.

"If there's any questions as to their blood relation, then that can be clarified after the fact" this right here makes the difference, people use nephew generalizing the term just to not explain the fact that a person aint blood related and to save time because lazyness, they will clarify the fact only if somebody ask them, everybody does that and is nothing new on society.

Again my point stands that Martha isnt that little fella aunt, is her husband nephew, son of his sister.

Nephew in law is the specific term in this case in her side only, she can say just nephew all she wants but she knows damn well is basically for courtesy and not by blood thats what matters at the end, if she divorce from her husband the nephew thing is over for her not for Steve.

Martha specified the fact to the girls to avoid confusion, is right there in the pic.

 

[xdddddd20233]

ID spoiler ?