3D-Daz Daz3d Art - Show Us Your DazSkill

5.00 star(s) 12 Votes

Seanthiar

Active Member
Jun 18, 2020
549
735
She looks older than what I was aiming for but I'm still happy with the results. (There's is a third render on my .) View attachment 1053005
HI,

like it, but I would try to optimize it a bit. The triangle tattoo on the hand is good, but the butterfly looks like a temporary tattoo. It's to dark for a real tattoo, got a small discolored border around it like a transparent film and could use a little transparency that you see the skin texture through it if you didn't want it look like a temp tat.

Seanthiar
 
  • Like
Reactions: GNVE and Anton3DP

Anton3DP

Member
May 24, 2017
124
1,869
Thanks a lot for the feedback. I'll definitely try that. I just need to find where I can edit the tatoo.

HI,

like it, but I would try to optimize it a bit. The triangle tattoo on the hand is good, but the butterfly looks like a temporary tattoo. It's to dark for a real tattoo, got a small discolored border around it like a transparent film and could use a little transparency that you see the skin texture through it if you didn't want it look like a temp tat.

Seanthiar
 

Anton3DP

Member
May 24, 2017
124
1,869
Another one from this character.

I changed the butterfly tattoo like Seanthiar proposed, I reduced it's opacity (maybe reduced it too much).

HI,

like it, but I would try to optimize it a bit. The triangle tattoo on the hand is good, but the butterfly looks like a temporary tattoo. It's to dark for a real tattoo, got a small discolored border around it like a transparent film and could use a little transparency that you see the skin texture through it if you didn't want it look like a temp tat.

Seanthiar

And you also get to see a bit more of her attributes. :sneaky:

OF2.jpg
 

xer.0

Member
Feb 7, 2018
250
2,072
X3RO I made you some ladies from different Genres

Alien girl, Monster girl, Fantasy girl, Demi-human

View attachment 1052878
Okay, okay... I see what you're saying...

But I'm just more jealous that you can whip that up so quickly on your computer :cry: This latest one took 12 hours to render to 71%, thought I did set the quality to 5 since I knew it'd be going overnight so that's probably the massive slowdown.

0224 Sarah Test 12 Alt.jpg

Worth it.

Anyone have tips for using HDRI's in finite dome w/ ground and making it seem as if they aren't hovering just above the ground?

EDIT: Figured out the HDRI ground, kinda obvious... Set Ground Position to Manual and adjust Y parameter.
 
Last edited:

ArturiousDesign

Engaged Member
Jan 31, 2019
3,859
14,125
Okay, okay... I see what you're saying...

But I'm just more jealous that you can whip that up so quickly on your computer :cry: This latest one took 12 hours to render to 71%, thought I did set the quality to 5 since I knew it'd be going overnight so that's probably the massive slowdown.

View attachment 1053321

Worth it
I leave mine on default, and only go to 2-3 for 4k pics. I don't even turn on spectral unless it's 4k. This looks great tho.
 

xer.0

Member
Feb 7, 2018
250
2,072
I leave mine on default, and only go to 2-3 for 4k pics. I don't even turn on spectral unless it's 4k. This looks great tho.
Thanks man.

I usually set it to 2 and render out the largest side to 2048px. Lately I've been doing 5 if I have the time to render it out. If it's at 2 it usually takes 3-4 hours for a HDRI only render.

I haven't messed with the spectral settings, what do they do?
 
  • Like
Reactions: ArturiousDesign

OutOfAshes

Engaged Member
Apr 14, 2019
3,596
39,486
Okay, okay... I see what you're saying...

But I'm just more jealous that you can whip that up so quickly on your computer :cry: This latest one took 12 hours to render to 71%, thought I did set the quality to 5 since I knew it'd be going overnight so that's probably the massive slowdown.

View attachment 1053321

Worth it.

Anyone have tips for using HDRI's in finite dome w/ ground and making it seem as if they aren't hovering just above the ground?
u will see no difference between qualitiy 1 and 5 trust me i tested it with quality 1 and 82 and me and others saw no difference
 
  • Thinking Face
Reactions: ArturiousDesign

xer.0

Member
Feb 7, 2018
250
2,072
u will see no difference between qualitiy 1 and 5 trust me i tested it with quality 1 and 82 and me and others saw no difference
Interesting, I should probably do an actual test at some point. I just feel like I've been getting sharper/ crisper looking renders when I've set it to 5, I don't think the setting of "5" actually does it but the longer rendering time and more iterations does.
 
  • Like
Reactions: OutOfAshes

OutOfAshes

Engaged Member
Apr 14, 2019
3,596
39,486
Interesting, I should probably do an actual test at some point. I just feel like I've been getting sharper/ crisper looking renders when I've set it to 5, I don't think the setting of "5" actually does it but the longer rendering time and more iterations does.
i tested it wit the same count of iters on both quality settings and really no noticable difference there
 

xer.0

Member
Feb 7, 2018
250
2,072
i tested it wit the same count of iters on both quality settings and really no noticable difference there
Figured, so probably just the fact that a higher quality means that you get longer renders, ergo more iterations.

Though the idea behind the quality with a larger sample area for the sample would result in sharper renders. So I think it really just comes down to high settings and let it cook.
 

OGDX

Member
Dec 5, 2017
114
1,504
what model did you use?
No clue man, this was ages ago, probably a mixture of a bunch of morphs, and I don't have the scene file anymore. I just remember that I was trying to make the face look like a bit like Barbara Palvin's.
 
5.00 star(s) 12 Votes