- May 14, 2018
- 200
- 1,492
did I miss something? I was watchingnow this section has become a chat, you are exaggerating, this is not the purpose of this section![]()
HI,She looks older than what I was aiming for but I'm still happy with the results. (There's is a third render on myYou must be registered to see the links.) View attachment 1053005
HI,
like it, but I would try to optimize it a bit. The triangle tattoo on the hand is good, but the butterfly looks like a temporary tattoo. It's to dark for a real tattoo, got a small discolored border around it like a transparent film and could use a little transparency that you see the skin texture through it if you didn't want it look like a temp tat.
Seanthiar
I don't think it's a children's show ... I hope you're not alonedid I miss something? I was watchingYou must be registered to see the links.
HI,
like it, but I would try to optimize it a bit. The triangle tattoo on the hand is good, but the butterfly looks like a temporary tattoo. It's to dark for a real tattoo, got a small discolored border around it like a transparent film and could use a little transparency that you see the skin texture through it if you didn't want it look like a temp tat.
Seanthiar
Okay, okay... I see what you're saying...X3RO I made you some ladies from different Genres
Alien girl, Monster girl, Fantasy girl, Demi-human
View attachment 1052878
I leave mine on default, and only go to 2-3 for 4k pics. I don't even turn on spectral unless it's 4k. This looks great tho.Okay, okay... I see what you're saying...
But I'm just more jealous that you can whip that up so quickly on your computerThis latest one took 12 hours to render to 71%, thought I did set the quality to 5 since I knew it'd be going overnight so that's probably the massive slowdown.
View attachment 1053321
Worth it
Thanks man.I leave mine on default, and only go to 2-3 for 4k pics. I don't even turn on spectral unless it's 4k. This looks great tho.
u will see no difference between qualitiy 1 and 5 trust me i tested it with quality 1 and 82 and me and others saw no differenceOkay, okay... I see what you're saying...
But I'm just more jealous that you can whip that up so quickly on your computerThis latest one took 12 hours to render to 71%, thought I did set the quality to 5 since I knew it'd be going overnight so that's probably the massive slowdown.
View attachment 1053321
Worth it.
Anyone have tips for using HDRI's in finite dome w/ ground and making it seem as if they aren't hovering just above the ground?
Interesting, I should probably do an actual test at some point. I just feel like I've been getting sharper/ crisper looking renders when I've set it to 5, I don't think the setting of "5" actually does it but the longer rendering time and more iterations does.u will see no difference between qualitiy 1 and 5 trust me i tested it with quality 1 and 82 and me and others saw no difference
i tested it wit the same count of iters on both quality settings and really no noticable difference thereInteresting, I should probably do an actual test at some point. I just feel like I've been getting sharper/ crisper looking renders when I've set it to 5, I don't think the setting of "5" actually does it but the longer rendering time and more iterations does.
Figured, so probably just the fact that a higher quality means that you get longer renders, ergo more iterations.i tested it wit the same count of iters on both quality settings and really no noticable difference there
No clue man, this was ages ago, probably a mixture of a bunch of morphs, and I don't have the scene file anymore. I just remember that I was trying to make the face look like a bit like Barbara Palvin's.what model did you use?