- Mar 22, 2018
- 227
- 7,840
"open minded"Have a super naughty holiday my fellow freaks View attachment 2261030
intriguing, tell me more."open minded"
Great posin as always.
My obsessive-compulsive disorder make me tweak some jmc. Set false auto follow in pJCMThighFwd_57 makes most genitals more natural.
View attachment 2264115
Thank you! I'll play with that!"open minded"
Great posin as always.
My obsessive-compulsive disorder make me tweak some jmc. Set false auto follow in pJCMThighFwd_57 makes most genitals more natural.
View attachment 2264115
Some correctives jmc works well with basic figure but deform geografts. Worst effects are visible when you pose figure with "Golden Palace". I could not fix it. I tried default genitalia and NGV8.intriguing, tell me more.
I understand it that the sizes of textures on genesis figures is a key here. 3840x3840 render resolution has no sense if basic skin of the model is mediocre ( for example default genesis 8 figures maps) For me 1920 x1080 works fine as long I stay with default figures. Png has no metadataloss so its good for working with( for example allow working with layers and transparency ). Jpeg files should be used only for final showing of work ( they lose a lot of data and are crappy with gimp but their weight is blessing )Trying to play with lighting on an image. Also trying to do a few tricks to make a render more realistic.
Question though? So, I rendered this image as a 3840x3840 .png and I used Gimp to convert it so a 1920x1920 .jpg. I heard someone on youtube say to increase realism you should render really big if you have good textures and then shrink the image. Is that true? I can't tell a massive difference, but could some of the veterans let me know if that trick works? Does GIMP work to that or do I need a different program?
The guy also said rendering as a PNG first is better. Is it better to render as a PNG then convert to JPG? Should I leave them as PNGs?
Ok so rendering as PNG is the best way then, and then converting to jpg for the final image to upload. Most Gen 8/8.1 figures, excluding the base figure, tend to have 4096x4096 textures right? So that would mean rendering high resolution would make a difference. The next question would be... would it just be better to keep the ultra-resolution of 3840x3840 or does having that high resolution just make editing easier? I could see how compacting down would allow a number of small editing errors to be "forgiven" while still having the look of a really HD render?I understand it that the sizes of textures on genesis figures is a key here. 3840x3840 render resolution has no sense if basic skin of the model is mediocre ( for example default genesis 8 figures maps) For me 1920 x1080 works fine as long I stay with default figures. Png has no metadataloss so its good for working with( for example allow working with layers and transparency ). Jpeg files should be used only for final showing of work ( they lose a lot of data and are crappy with gimp but their weight is blessing )
For compressing to jpeg you can use Gimp but they are faster and simpler programms there. For example I recommend you RiotYou must be registered to see the links
You can resize and compress many pictures at one moment! There is also a good number of important settings as well.
Where is this machine from?She doesn't learn! Don't play for money if you don't have any. A bet is a bet ...
View attachment 2264335
Where is this machine from?