Unreal Engine Delta Zone [v21.0] [DEVOLUTION]

[GreatestDerp]

Norton didn't detect anything

You're trolling right?

 

[Actual_Funky_Kong]

So just to clarify, you need the nsfw version for the crack to work, right? Doesn't the sfw version come without the right animation files or something?

 

[VanillaLover]

So just to clarify, you need the nsfw version for the crack to work, right? Doesn't the sfw version come without the right animation files or something?

You're just locked out of the NSFW stuff; "Contraceptive pills and Pregnancy tests are censored, Ivy has underwear (weirdly enough since she has panties as a separate clothing item), and you can't masturbate or get raped.

 

[Actual_Funky_Kong]

You're just locked out of the NSFW stuff; "Contraceptive pills and Pregnancy tests are censored, Ivy has underwear (weirdly enough since she has panties as a separate clothing item), and you can't masturbate or get raped.

I see, thanks

 

[Sum Gi]

Honestly? no. It has a lot of problems and is lacking a lot. But this is the wrong question. The game is in alpha, meaning it really isn't gonna wow people. The real question you should be asking is "is this game worth trying out?", to which I'd say yes.

How many more years until it's not "in alpha" anymore?

 

[VanillaLover]

How many more years until it's not "in alpha" anymore?

Can't really say. Solo dev, ambitious game, those factors don't really mix well. I'd give it 4 years before a decent release.

 

[P0iSON]

I'm getting a "not enough VRAM" message - how much VRAM should I have for this game?

Added:
It worked. I used an alternative crack and the message disappeared.

 

[VanillaLover]

I'm getting a "not enough VRAM" message - how much VRAM should I have for this game?

1050 Ti is the minimum so 4 GB, but I have run this on an iGPU with 2 GB allocated running fine.

 

[DKOC]

I'm getting a "not enough VRAM" message - how much VRAM should I have for this game?

Added:
It worked. I used an alternative crack and the message disappeared.

I have an aging Titan X 12gb that barely runs it, but it only ever consumes like 3 gb. And its not a performant gpu. But I run it on DX11 with settings mostly at medium. Textures at high, and shadows at low.

 

[biktori410]

I have an aging Titan X 12gb that barely runs it, but it only ever consumes like 3 gb. And its not a performant gpu. But I run it on DX11 with settings mostly at medium. Textures at high, and shadows at low.

Wow Dude really? i got GTX 970 And it runs mixed Med/Higher settings Well at 30-40 FPS.
On some areas it drops to 20.But Overall Its Decent

 

[DKOC]

Partly the reason its not very performant is its windows 8.1 and can't get latest drivers, so lose some performance over that. Also have to run it at like 1600x900 resolution, and lots of checkerboard textures that failed to load in probably doesn't help, and get usually around 45-50 FPS.

 

[2055]

I was fully prepared to throw money at this dev, even if it's a bad decision.

Then I found the v17 discussion. Never changed my mind faster.

 

[Mr_Big_G]

I was fully prepared to throw money at this dev, even if it's a bad decision.

Then I found the v17 discussion. Never changed my mind faster.

Alright, I'm out of the loop, what happened with V17?

Did they regress, downgrade, make a blatant set-up for a rug-pull or bail out of the gig?

 

[mastajek]

Alright, I'm out of the loop, what happened with V17?

Did they regress, downgrade, make a blatant set-up for a rug-pull or bail out of the gig?

I think it's because they introduced more DRM in v17.

 

[malicardy]

I think it's because they introduced more DRM in v17.

That and the fact nothing else of value was added yet again. can only handle so many updates with months in between without any meaningful additions.

 

[EdGuy69]

Dang, I came back to see what's new. The game is garbage, can't believe what this fraud has done so far while also charging 10 bucks for it. Hilarious.

 

[Elminzter]

the developer is just milking the people its similar to the day before scam....fyi, if any serious developer wants to make a complete game, the game would be done asap, e.g. the day before actually sold 100k+ copies, if the game is in a finished state the developer would had made millions that is day one sales alone... but its sooo much easier to just milk the clueless...

 

[2055]

Alright, I'm out of the loop, what happened with V17?

Did they regress, downgrade, make a blatant set-up for a rug-pull or bail out of the gig?

Basically the following:

DRM, mandatory online server verification, hardcore mode CTD, undressing not working...

Mordona has accurately reported the dev's stated reasoning for mandating a server connection.

However, what anyone who pays for (or even just plays) v17 should at least consider is that testing a high-score board in no way requires the dev to force anyone to connect to a server.

Any possible multi-player features the dev may want to test can easily be gated behind an optional server connection. The excuse of "I just want to give you this extra content, so just connect here, don't worry about it" doesn't really make sense.

However, there are other goals that can only be achieved by making that connection mandatory. Aside from the obvious data safety concerns, enforcing the server connection prior to game launch ensures that players (including paying Patreon supporters) don't actually have any ownership of the end product.

 

[WsNyc]

So strange that V17 still not uploaded here after, i don't know - 1 month.

 

[Bob69]

So strange that V17 still not uploaded here after, i don't know - 1 month.

Mandatory online won't get added until its play-able offline. Thats a site rule forever.