It's missing in your opinion, majority of us here want heterosexual sex or lesbian at most, there are tons of futa games out there if you're missing it this much. Of course in the end devs will decide what's in but I hope they will keep the trend and not stray from it. And yeah, I've also bought a game on Steam and I am a patreon/subscribestar supporter (although irregularly).
Yes, it has been posted at the same date this thread was updated I think (courtesy of SonsOfLiberty).
With the somewhat recent Patreon review (and the then-upcoming Steam review) some time ago, that particular scene with the render angles it had could be perceived as risky -for the wrong reasons imho- as it was too early in the game, before we've had a chance to establish characters or settings.
I personally wasn't deflecting or anything, simply answered to a person that pretty much said "I fear they will slowly remove Ain from the game" that is this not the case.
See above, no excuse or anything, just a fact that adding more renders of Ain is pretty much evidence that we don't plan to remove her or whatever.
People get this come and up white knighting for JUST 5 old renders? They really really need new priorities to focus on tbhI think this whole thing is blown out of proportions
Anyhow, I hope my answer satisfies you because that's all I can provide.
With the somewhat recent Patreon review (and the then-upcoming Steam review) some time ago, that particular scene with the render angles it had could be perceived as risky -for the wrong reasons imho- as it was too early in the game, before we've had a chance to establish characters or settings.
We were a bit uncomfortable about risking our presence on those platforms (and, frankly, the existence of the game) with this small part, so after much discussion we removed it.
Could it make an appearance again in the future? It's likely, but not in the exact form it was.
That's all there is to it. No grand conspiracy or something.
As for the dynamics, I agree it showed them nicely but we do have plenty of other scenes showing it, so the overall feeling is not lost imho.
I personally wasn't deflecting or anything, simply answered to a person that pretty much said "I fear they will slowly remove Ain from the game" that is this not the case.
See above, no excuse or anything, just a fact that adding more renders of Ain is pretty much evidence that we don't plan to remove her or whatever.
And in any case, if we wanted or were forced to remove her entirely, we certainly wouldn't do it 2 renders at a time. That would take ages.
I understand the reasons, and don't get us wrong we all absolutely love your game. It's just a bitter pill to swallow, I really loved how that scene played out (as short as it was), paradoxally because it was early in the game. I'll keep the old version I have somewhere on my pc just in case there are other "modifications" later. I just hope all this stuff won't influence the tone of the game too much in the future, some people don't seem to understand that's what most people are worried about here.I think this whole thing is blown out of proportions
Anyhow, I hope my answer satisfies you because that's all I can provide.
With the somewhat recent Patreon review (and the then-upcoming Steam review) some time ago, that particular scene with the render angles it had could be perceived as risky -for the wrong reasons imho- as it was too early in the game, before we've had a chance to establish characters or settings.
We were a bit uncomfortable about risking our presence on those platforms (and, frankly, the existence of the game) with this small part, so after much discussion we removed it.
Could it make an appearance again in the future? It's likely, but not in the exact form it was.
That's all there is to it. No grand conspiracy or something.
As for the dynamics, I agree it showed them nicely but we do have plenty of other scenes showing it, so the overall feeling is not lost imho.
I personally wasn't deflecting or anything, simply answered to a person that pretty much said "I fear they will slowly remove Ain from the game" that is this not the case.
See above, no excuse or anything, just a fact that adding more renders of Ain is pretty much evidence that we don't plan to remove her or whatever.
And in any case, if we wanted or were forced to remove her entirely, we certainly wouldn't do it 2 renders at a time. That would take ages.
This is probably me being stupid, but I’m not sure what any of this means; if it’s all right, could you please go into more detail?
This is not what white knighting means (and in fact you're the one doing the white knighting). We've asked a question that's been ignored until now so it's no wonder that more people were concerned. And we're concerned for a reason because this sets a precedent and shows that once it got out to the wider public devs have become more restrained for reasons unknown.
100% this.
Says a guy with over 1400 posts (posted in about a year) on a porn forum xD.
At the end of the day, what does it really matter? It was something they clearly spent some time discussing and came up with a decision they felt was best for the future of the game. Ain isn't going anywhere and a game that is "in development" always has a chance to change, like we've seen countless of times with other games on this site. Sure, it can sting a little when something we like is changed or removed, but this one... I just don't see it as being that big of a deal.
Thank's Paz ! that gives closure, and confirms what I was guessing, good that there is no conspirancy behind
I’d like to know for myself, to understand what they’re cutting and why they’re doing it, so that I can be informed about what else might get cut, as well as what sort of content I can expect to see or not see in the future, so I can adjust my expectations accordingly.
Some of you might have missed it, but only a few months ago, Patreon got in a huff and banned/blocked the account (And relative monetization) for this game. Reasons were stated to be it violating their content policy.
Paz On the subject of story adjustments, I'm glad that Ivy's stay at Zaton's home was changed. It always seemed weirdly out of place to rescue her and immediately throw her into a cage leaving the shotgun collar on her. It made even less sense with how Ivy begins to trust him after. So I like that it was changed to Zahra removing her collar and they keep her in an unlocked cell with a bunch of food. Makes it seem far less antagonistic so that Ivy's eventual trust doesn't seem out of place.I think this whole thing is blown out of proportions
Anyhow, I hope my answer satisfies you because that's all I can provide.
With the somewhat recent Patreon review (and the then-upcoming Steam review) some time ago, that particular scene with the render angles it had could be perceived as risky -for the wrong reasons imho- as it was too early in the game, before we've had a chance to establish characters or settings.
We were a bit uncomfortable about risking our presence on those platforms (and, frankly, the existence of the game) with this small part, so after much discussion we removed it.
Could it make an appearance again in the future? It's likely, but not in the exact form it was.
That's all there is to it. No grand conspiracy or something.
As for the dynamics, I agree it showed them nicely but we do have plenty of other scenes showing it, so the overall feeling is not lost imho.
I personally wasn't deflecting or anything, simply answered to a person that pretty much said "I fear they will slowly remove Ain from the game" that is this not the case.
See above, no excuse or anything, just a fact that adding more renders of Ain is pretty much evidence that we don't plan to remove her or whatever.
And in any case, if we wanted or were forced to remove her entirely, we certainly wouldn't do it 2 renders at a time. That would take ages.
Yeah, we thought we amended all the text to reflect this but apparently some bits and pieces escaped.
