I don't think lazy is quite the right word, when people say it. The medium improves, the means to create improve, more artists pop up, with better workflows, become more competitive, and you have to take into account the rest of the space. Nobody exists in a vacuum and something that could be sustainable before, isn't. New economy, new audience etc. It's not so much that Desire didn't do a good job, but it's a similar scenario of a previous release, with the same characters involved. It's not moving the needle forward. Now, I haven't watched it, I can't say much about it, and I have no interest for it, for the reasons stated above. I could be the only one that has those reasons, and that's just me projecting. Sure. But maybe other people feel that way, too.
For me, personally, I played Witcher 1 and 2, didn't like them, so I have no real interest in Witcher 3, or the girls, so I am not quite qualified, or an authority to direct Desire, let alone dictate, what he should do next. But making these overly ambitious movies, that take this long to make, to serve more of the same, I don't think it's that viable. Personally, I don't think it's that viable for any creator. If we're at the point that it takes the creator two to three years to release their film, and that be just part 1 sometimes, is just too much to ask of the audience. That's a workflow issue. Maybe the base is large enough right now that it isn't an issue, but development times are something that are just going to keep growing, and that's inevitably going to lead to loss of subscriber base, or make that base more volatile. At least, that's how I see it.