No, it doesn't. You are copying & pasting an actual argument you've heard from some "hate porn" (aka news)."Artists" said the same low-grade argument against photography (regarding labour). In all fairness, those who make best use of AI art, are artists themselves.
And when said criticism is done unthinkingly, and with the purpose of putting something down, it is mean-spirited. Was nothing wrong with those jugs, all he wanted to do, like you, was hate on something.
What makes it ironic, is that there is no one against AI art, who's come up with an original idea. You're repeating arguments you've heard on platforms like YouTube, and getting really upset when someone doesn't conform. That's the greatest irony. Your main argument against AI, is something you're guilty of doing yourself.
Taking an idea from someone, and straight up, word-by-word, repeating it. At least AI art creates something new out of it. It isn't simply copied and pasted. Also, it takes a lot of work to do properly.