Nice job on Rosalyn.
Interesting.
Cheers
Thanks!
Demanding sex scene for all characters because funny page number.
(Actually no, I just need more femdom. My character still hasn't been dominated by a good amount of characters in his group. Literally impossible to play like that. Immersion broken. Why no bratty dog girl on top yet?)
There's a mix of scenes coming, some maledom, some femdom, and some in between!
I am mainly joking of course. You know best and I am literally not paying anything because I am too poor. So, I'll take what I can get which has been pretty good so far.
Also:
I literally had to retype dog four times because I typed out god every single fucking type. Holy shit. Maya is getting to me.
I know, dw. I *try* to keep everyone happy without obsessing over it, not every scene will be for everyone, it's mostly just whatever fits the characters.
hi i have few questions:
1)in the prologue after you save everyone while you are in your house is there much a difference choosing sam or sarah (especially her), do i lose some scenes foerever or lose many affection/trust points?
2)can i get single ending for a character? as well can i get an harem one?
3)if i romance someone does it block me with someone in particoular?
4)overall which is better nether, aether or abyssal in general? or none of the 3? and which abilities does the 3 usually brings?
5)at which point does one path (the 3 corruptions) lock me from the others?
6)can i get a mix of skill between nether,aether and abyssal without lock?
7)is it convenient to "grind" trust and affection as soon as possible for everyone or is it best to do that only with very few character?
8)are there a lot of missable events/scenes regarding either your choices,stats or your patner?
thank you in advance
1. No, you can view the scenes later as dreams. Whoever you choose will come up in some future conversations though.
2. No endings yet, but yes, I currently plan to have solo endings, small-group endings between groups that make sense (ex. Sarah/Metatron), and probably some generic harem ending.
3. No. Longer term some characters may not be fond of that, but I don't want to punish people.
4. They are intended to be relatively balanced rather than one clearly superior. There will also be future options. I wouldn't stress it too much now.
5. Coming Soon(tm), there will be corruption cap limit breaks. The 20 break won't hardlock you into anything, the 50 cap will. You will be warned ingame, so don't stress it.
6. The 20 corruption ones, yes. Aether/Nether combo will have their own pat. Abyssal does not. You can't mix multiple 50s, they're not mix and match, the % is how much of your existence is predominately that element.
7. Just depends on how much you want to grind honestly. You can max everyone, but it'd take some grinding and/or easy mode's T/A boosts.
8. Choices, no, mostly variants of scenes. Training scenes have stat requirements. Partner is like choice, you get variants of scenes (Celica probably gets the most, especially in Severn) but nothing super serious.
They come from a negative place in real life mythos to boot east or west, ancient china to the celts, most societies have the concept of a "succubus" and they aren't exactly the nicest of things generally. Chinese succubus are actually beings out of nightmares, beings that the tormented souls of women who are raped and tortured in the afterlife until they lose all humanity and become much like the creatures tormenting them and let loose into the world of the living, unfeeling, undying monsters.
Like legit they are like Senator Armstrong, they consist entirely of a stomach and brain and without destruction of their brain they will never die, there are legends of them being cut in half, drawn and quarted, buried alive in old mines, burned to ash and they just shrug it all off. Makes the bad luck European versions seem downright tame.
._. It makes you wonder why so many focus on the portrayals of the temptress rather then the asiatic undying mass murderer. I guess it appeals more to the adult market, the other variant could I suppose be used in a similar fashion but it would end up with the snuff tag in it.
The majority of older succubus and succubus-adjacent lore, going back to ancient Mesopotamia and Judaism, did NOT include soul-sucking or lethal aspects, though they were often considered morally bad and some were unapologetically evil or capable of evil. Usually when religious figures at the time started portraying them more poorly.
Lilith was 'morally bad' but her flavor of bad was mostly just being horny and not worshiping god. Buddhist mythology has a pretty harmless succ. Sumerian mythology gets weird as fuck, originally Lilitu (mixed bag, who *may* have inspired the jewish Lilith myth) and Lamashtu (evil animal monster) were separate but eventually merged, while at times lilitu were more of a concept that weren't that lethal.
I personally find it fascinating how often older succubus myths, up through the 1400s-1500s or so, described succubi as really gross (pissing, animal parts, etc) rather than evil, though sometimes it was both. Not a universal aspect much less something I wanted to explore ingame though lol.
Yes, there are some very fucked up succubus myths, but most were relatively harmless, and (to my understanding) the whole thing fundamentally started as a myth to explain sleep paralysis and wet dreams/nocturnal emissions. Interestingly enough, some of the oldest ones even had aspects of female empowerment in them.
It actually bugs me how common it is nowadays for people to assume that the only correct version of succubi are murderous monsters and anything else just isn't familiar with the lore.
Not aimed at you specifically, though that spawned my rambling. Just wanted to throw that out there since I see that a lot. There are many versions of succubi to draw from, all of them more-or-less valid.
Divine Dawn's mythology is heavily based on various forms of judaism and jewish kabbalism, and while the succubi are (in theory) somewhat original, I'd definitely say they fall closer to Lilith than Lamashtu. The angels are certainly a lot closer to the kabbalistic variant than normal Christianity.
Actually, the foxgirl myth is remarkably similar; Chinese hulijing, Korean kumiho/gumiho, and Japanese kitsune. Each has succubus-esque elements, and each has a variety of portrayals. The Korean gumiho are *mostly* portrayed as carnivorous monsters that seduce and eat some/all of a guy, BUT there are also good gumiho. Kitsune are mostly portrayed as tricksters, but there are some bad ones too. Hulijing varied wildly, to my understanding they were originally viewed more positively (albeit dangerous) while over time it became more negative? Not an expert on those by any means though.
Far eastern mythology in general has a surprisingly wide variety of seductress spirits, some evil, many of them more in the range of morally grey or even relatively safe if you don't fuck up.
Oh, and while I'm spamming anyways; some aspects of vampire mythology *probably* developed from succubus mythology, part of why vampires are so often portrayed as sexual creatures. Lots of similarities in those aspects of that mythology, and just like succubi there's a wide variety of takes from "evil and murderey" to "sparkling handsome guys" and everything in between.
Sorry, that dragged on longer than I thought. I just love talking about this stuff, there's so much cool ancient mythology, and often so many takes on it. Lots of potential to inspire modern content!