- Jul 27, 2017
- 1,141
- 4,295
I agree when it comes to DAZ, though the same logic doesn't apply to Honey Select and other engines that come with premade animations and don't require rendering.
Takes me about 5-10 hours to make a basic 1-3 second looping animation for a scene. Most of the work actually goes into creating the models etc. By your logic i should just use stock models that everyone else uses because it's less work.you just know it took the dev a calendar month to visually compose and animate
People who demand full animated sex scene are the one who don't read and/or play the game. They either use the gallery or skip the entire game to see the sex scenes and then complain about a 5 min. update with no sex in it.
That stuff ^^^^^^ up there.If people want to see animation that bad then they should go to xvideos/pornhub or at least look for things in the Animations section, not in the Games section.
Everytime I see someone saying something like "Stop making games without animations, this is a game not a book" I swear that I fucking hate that guy.
Devs should do animations because that's what they want for their games
Yes, but that's also part of the problem. Doing animations for your game if you have a monster rig (preferably two) and know what you're doing is one thing. Being a noob developer and having 50% of your dev time taken up because you think you need to have animations for your game to be good is just a waste of everybody's time. Except for people who would rather have mediocre animations than more content I guess.Besides, no matter what any of us say or do here, there will always be a market for animations in these types of games. And so long as the market exists for it, then there will be developers willing to create for that market.
And whether or not you, I, or anyone else approves of the matter, we should *still* leave it up to the devs to make that call for themselves. If they want to do it, that's for them to decide. You can choose to be upset about it, you can choose to ignore their product, you can choose to react in any manner of ways. But attempting to tell someone how to do their job? That's just bad form.Yes, but that's also part of the problem. Doing animations for your game if you have a monster rig (preferably two) and know what you're doing is one thing. Being a noob developer and having 50% of your dev time taken up because you think you need to have animations for your game to be good is just a waste of everybody's time. Except for people who would rather have mediocre animations than more content I guess.
Nobody is telling anybody how to do their job, people are just expressing their opinions and preferences. If people want to intentionally make their games worse, that's up to them.And whether or not you, I, or anyone else approves of the matter, we should *still* leave it up to the devs to make that call for themselves. If they want to do it, that's for them to decide. You can choose to be upset about it, you can choose to ignore their product, you can choose to react in any manner of ways. But attempting to tell someone how to do their job? That's just bad form.
I'm kinda the opposite. for me the smooth animations stick out terribly and break the visual flow of the otherwise slide show paced game with static renders. where as low fps animations stay true to the general style of most VNs. but of course this too like all things can be done badly or well.5 frame looped animation is an abomination and shouldn't be used unironically.
Dude no offense but I read your previous comment before and I didn't quote you because I didn't want to point you out, but you're a good example of what I say.That stuff ^^^^^^ up there.
That's where I'm seeing a lot of the anger and dissatisfaction regarding animations going.
Some of you just seem to be under this misguided belief or idea that there is a specific way a game needs to be played or enjoyed. And when someone comes along with a different opinion you seem to be getting defensive, offended, and behaving line you want to lash out for whatever reason.
You go from being two people talking about how you like a game to this, to one person stating their opinion and another person doing this:
It's fine to vent frustration. It's okay if someone's opinion irritates you.
It's not okay to just say something someone else enjoys is a complete waste of time and resources just because you don't find any value in it folks.
That's narrow minded and doesn't take ANY consideration into account for the tastes feelings or preferences of others.
Besides, no matter what any of us say or do here, there will always be a market for animations in these types of games. And so long as the market exists for it, then there will be developers willing to create for that market.
Besides, this... This I can agree with.
So why don't we just calm down a bit and remember we're talking about porn scenes in video games.
Then ask yourselves if it's really worth getting so upset over someone having a different opinion on what they want to fap to, or if someone else's opinion of what makes for good fap material has EVER hurt you in any way.
Quick edit/ side note:
https://f95zone.to/sam/latest_alpha/
Currently, there are 10,168 games listed here.
If you filter out the animated tag: 6,607 games are left.
3,561 animated games
6607 games without animations.
So it's not exactly like folks who prefer games without them are suffering from a lack of content.
Just something to keep in mind.
See, I can respect that take on the discussion.Nobody is telling anybody how to do their job, people are just expressing their opinions and preferences. If people want to intentionally make their games worse, that's up to them.
Dude no offense but I read your previous comment before and I didn't quote you because I didn't want to point you out, but you're a good example of what I say.
There are tons of people comenting, complaining, ranting and insulting about no animations/bad animations, yet you find one post saying the opposite and a few comments agreeing with it and we are the ones "not taking into considerations what others like"? We are the ones "getting defensive and offended when someone comes along with a different opinion"?
You're literally the guy telling gay people people to not kiss in public because they have to respect the heterosexuality of people around.
I didn't dismissed the thing that others like, in fact I literally said that devs should do it because they want it and I said that I do it, thus I like it.See, I can respect that take on the discussion.
Really? I pointed out the way you flatly dismissed things that some people actually like as being a problem.
And your response to that is a poor attempt at equating me to homophobe?
Talk about escalation. lol
I'm sorry, but at this point I can not take anything you say seriously.
I'm literally not telling gay people anything because that's their business and nothing to do with me.I didn't dismissed the thing that others like, in fact I literally said that devs should do it because they want it and I said that I do it, thus I like it.
You're the one who quoted my comment and reversed the context in order to make it look like if I was the one not liking/tolerating something here. I don't need you to have "troll" on your name to understand that classic troll behavior.
I'll insist, you're literally the guy who tells gay people people to not kiss in public. The irony and hypocresy is huge. It's okay if you can't take me seriously, it's mutual and I'm not planning to answer you anymore. You can go back to your bridge.