That's literally one storyline pal, chill out with your assumptions. Yeah most female protagonist corruption games deal with ugly bastards and older guys.
If you'd been paying attention you would have known that what sparked this particular discussion, was several people moaning about being forced to play the old man to progress in the game. Contrary to what you and others believe, I could'nt care less whether she has sex with the old man. I certainly don't have an old man kink, but such content doesn't bother me either. What I love about this game is Jane being corrupted into a whore, that's my kink. I really do want her to fall right to the bottom of the rabbit hole, and as long as that happens, I don't really care what else Jane has to do to get there.
seeing as this game is being made with multiple routes and choices
What exactly are these? On the face of it yes, it might appear that there are multiple routes. But since you can't progress without playing all the sex content, and you're not allowed to pick and choose, there is in effect only one route. So I don't know how you can claim the contrary, when it obviously isn't so
You're not "making it up" you're just full of yourself parading your "fact" around as if that diminishes other people's opinions which is silly.
When you say there are 'multiple routes and choices', that is just your opinion, because the facts don't back you up. Because as things stand there is effectively only one route. And there is nothing from the Dev to suggest that that is ever going to change. Now maybe it will change in the future, but until it does or the Dev makes some statement saying it will, everything you claim about that is just an 'opinion'. Whereas when I say there is effectively only one route, that is 'fact', because the way the game has been set up, means that your 'multiple routes' are in fact just one route. Do you see the difference between opinions and facts? One is true, whilst the other is only true if circumstances change, which so far they haven't.
that diminishes other people's opinions which is silly.
What is silly, is that you actually believe that your opinions are more relevant than plain facts
I'm not even sure why you're barking so much about this... maybe cause you've came out and said you're old.
I said I was 61, you said I was old. It was intended as a facetious response to someone's lame attempt to put me down by claiming I was clearly an adolescent. I consider myself to be a mature middle-aged person. These days 60 is the new 40. And this has got nothing to do with me handling differing views, but you accepting that your views are simply not backed up by the facts.
I explained very clearly that corruption can be done in many ways.
Except that in this game, there is currently no way to achieve what you're claiming. So how exactly can it be done, when there is no way to do it? You keep saying this, as if eventually this is going to come to pass. But you don't know that, because once again it's just your opinion. Currently, the facts are, that there is only one way. I'm not knocking your views, just your claim that it's in some way going to happen. Because so far, there's nothing in the game to suggest that it ever will.
Also stop acting like you are right because of how the game forces things, the game is still very much in development and that includes additions to early game content...Unless the DEV says these things then stop speaking for them.
I don't need to act like I'm right, because it's a plain fact that as things stand there is only one possible route to progress and that's by playing all the content. You're the one who is claiming stuff that the Dev has never said, by claiming there are all these different routes, that plainly don't exist. They don't exist, because the Dev has clearly made it impossible to play the game in any other way. The Dev made the game that way, it didn't mysteriously become that way on it's own. The game doesn't force you to do that, the Dev forces you to do that, by making the game in that way.
You claim that it's because the game is still in development, as if that explains why the Dev would force you to play all the content to make progress in the game. Please tell me what the alternative strategy is, that's explained by the game 'being in development'? The fact is you don't actually know anything, and you're just using that empty statement to try to give some validity to your claim, that there are multiple routes in the game. Because you already know full well that there aren't.
I'm so sick of people like you on these forums who can't handle constructive criticisms and opinions different from yours.
This is the problem. You've decided in your own mind, that I am criticising your opinions. Whereas, the reality is I've only been considering the facts, which you've decided to conveniently ignore, to push your own agenda as to what form you think this game should take. You say there are multiple routes in this game to corrupt Jane, based around various storylines you can play, which you then claim with absolutely no evidence will subsequently lead to totally independant routes. The current evidence simply doesn't back up this claim. So that is an assumption plain and simple, which you falsely accuse me of making. I don't need to make assumptions, because what I'm saying is true, whilst what you're claiming MIGHT become true. Yeah it might happen, but until it does, there aren't multiple routes, there's just one. And your inability to accept that very simple fact, tells us more about your attitude to constructive criticism, than mine.
You ruin the idea of forum discussion by dismissing everyone who feels differently or has ideas by stamping down their words as no more than bitching or entitlement.
I'm not dismissing your opinions, I'm dismissing your attempts to try to pass them off as facts. You keep pushing this argument that Jane could be corrupted in multiple ways, as if it's inevitable. But there is nothing to indicate that it ever will be, except in your imagination. Now you may not like that, but it's true. How many times do I have to say it? At PRESENT there is only ONE route to corrupt Jane
Maybe, just maybe I came to this forum originally to list my hopes for the game and talk about it because I like it.
Maybe you did have that intention? But you didn't do that, so it's irrelevant to this discussion. What you did actually do, was try to make out that I was talking a load of bull, by making out that really there are multiple ways in the game to corrupt Jane. When everyone knows there's only one at present. Now it may be that the Dev will change course at some point, and make it so that what you say is correct. But so far there is nothing to suggest that he will. And that is a simple fact.
Now I claimed that the Dev intends for Jane to be corrupted. And that claim is based not on my opinion, but the way the game is currently set up. If the Dev intends for everyone to have choices, then why is the game set up the way it is, where you have to play all the content to progress? I mean why else would he do that? Neither you, or anybody else who disagrees with me, has come up with a convincing alternative explanation for why that is so.
You know what you somehow keep skirting, the patreon description and I quote "This is an adult visual novel about a girl who just lost her job and is unsure about her life. Now it's up to you how you want to shape her destiny. Based on your choice, she can become one of the upstanding citizens of the society or she can sink at the bottom.
You're right that is at the beginning of the game and it does suggest that the game will have multiple routes. But how many overviews of games, that are written when the game has barely started, end up describing what the game subsequently becomes? The proof is in the pudding, and the evidence from the actual game suggests that Dev long ago discarded that idea of what the game was going to become.
Now why would a Dev switch from a more complex game with multiple routes, to a much simpler game with effectively just one? I don't know the answer to that question with certainty. But based on my experience of other games, I'm going to hazard the guess that it's to save time and make sure he can publish regular updates. He's made the game linear, and is pushing ahead with the route that he and most of his patrons most favour. Now that's an opinion, and it may be wrong, because people's opinions often are. But it doesn't matter because even if my opinion about that is wrong, what it's attempting to explain is definitely a fact. The overview bears absolutely no relation to the game in its current form.
Maybe the game will end up being linear, but the dev appears to want it to be more than that and gives you choices because of that. The only limit to it is that the game is still very much in development.
The game IS linear, the Dev APPEARED to want it to be more than that, there is effectively only ONE CHOICE at the moment. Here you are again trying to misinterpret the facts, to fit your scenario. And then once again you say because the game is still in development, this in some way gives validity to you making claims based on no evidence. Every single game in existence is in development until it's finished. But it's pretty obvious what most of them are about, and that they're not going to change significantly. A game 'being in development' doesn't make it more likely that big changes are going to happen. Only the Dev coming out and saying, 'Yeah, I'm going to start giving this game multiple routes instead of the one we currently have' achieves that. Until that happens I'm going to carry on calling your theories what they are. Just theories.
However some of us have ideas and hopes for the game.
If only you restricted yourself to calling them just ideas and hopes?
You should take your own advice and move on from interacting cause for someone who is 61 you're not mature enough to handle differing views.
Let's see you come up with some actual facts to back up your differing views?
