I've seen this argument so many times and it is always so absolutely idiotic.
The only way this is would be valid is if the dev is a no life loser that just likes wasting his time making porn games and doesn't expect any return from doing it.
If they do want to make money then they need to actually know what their intended audience wants, how would they know if they ignore all criticism like some egomaniac redditor who thinks their shit doesn't smell.
Second, even if the dev has a vision
, there's no guarantee that vision is worth shit, a clear example is this game, dev had a a clear vision that no one else liked, except him and the usual cheerleaders of the site who are afraid of expressing criticism or being seen as "negative". Do you really think this game doesn't have enough quality in its renders to succed if the dev had delivered a different story??? This game has better renders than 90% of other games here, yet it was getting buttfucked by its awfully written characters and plot.
Those positivity cheerleaders usually push devs to "follow their vision" and ignore all criticism. The result? Well, you are seeing it right there, he wasted close to a year working on a project that was dead from start.
Devs are trying to sell their games, so they need to make content people are willing to pay for. That's also why the most successful devs know their audience very well and know what content they want and what other to avoid.
The thought that a dev can come out and just deliver whatever the fuck he wants without considering the audience he is trying to appeal to, is the reason a lot of games fail. This being a great example of that.
This trash game is abandoned and it is not because of some random user posting mean comments on the forum or on discord, it is not because of people criticizing his game, or asking for changes, shitting on tags or whatever.
It is the money. That's all that matters, if he was making lots of it he wouldn't care about 90% of people here trashing his game, he would keep going while just laughing about it.
I sometimes wonder if these people who think some "mean" comments are going to make a dev abandon a lucrative project are really adults or are they just that naive or delusional.
And they always say those "loud" people that "pressure" the dev never pay, so then all the other people who supposedly love the game and are the actually majority.... Why dont they pay for it either??????? Because no one is paying for this last I checked.
If they did put their money where their mouth is then those game wouldn't get abandoned but alas, they never do.
So they encourage devs to waste time and resources on games that are bound to fail, encourage him to ignore all criticism that would perhaps help him to turn things around, they don't actually support him monetarily either, and when the game fails, they then pretend it was because of some mean comments???
If I didn't believe they are just low iq I would suspect they have actual bad intentions when doing this.