VN Ren'Py Abandoned Dual Family [v1.22.1ce] [Gumdrop Games]

2.10 star(s) 191 Votes

LazyName

Member
Aug 17, 2017
130
349
Sure if you consider $1 financially supporting. Also I have stated before the patrons are at fault just the same because they allow him to postpone the release indefinitely by subsidizing his incompetent behavior. Remove the funds and watch how quickly things change. No one is absolving them from any blame, merely pointing out that it falls on those on the receiving end to do the right thing, not their subordinates.
That is by definition a financial support. They are supporting his behavior and the pace at which he works and theyre even susidizing his missed deadlines the thing is its my belief that if theyre comfortable with all of that then there was no moral wrong committed by any party. I'll say this its totally ok to think kyle is incompetent and to criticize him for his work/lack there of. I just think its silly to try and also turn this into a moral issue as well.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Joshua Tree

LazyName

Member
Aug 17, 2017
130
349
This presupposes the idea that there ins't in fact a standard when there clearly is. We aren't making this up as we go after-all. The content creator not only creates, but promises to adhere to a certain standard so that they may gain your trust and as a reward your continued patronage. Without it, there's simply distrust and confusion which isn't marketable in any practical way.
Some patreon creators promise updates on a set time schedule some promise bonuses like being able to make a new character or having their names featured in the credits. What they decide to put forward as incentives to donate in addition to the work they already plan on producing is all varied and its up to patrons to decide what is worth and what isn't. Kyle promises dev updates, pin up shots, and early access to his releases from there its up to patrons if they want to give him their money.
 

Pestilence

Newbie
Jul 8, 2017
69
84
That is by definition a financial support. They are supporting his behavior and the pace at which he works and theyre even susidizing his missed deadlines the thing is its my belief that if theyre comfortable with all of that then there was no moral wrong committed by any party. I'll say this its totally ok to think kyle is incompetent and to criticize him for his work/lack there of. I just think its silly to try and also turn this into a moral issue as well.
I wont argue nuances about the single dollar, "its silly". However I will ask why isn't morality important when its specifically why I'm addressing him as a POS? You're attempting to argue with my statement whilst simultaneously dismissing the very foundation on which its predicated. You can't have your cake and eat it too. So either you accept that its my opinion and move on. Or you don't and question what actual moral issue I'm referring too rather then attempting a sleight of hand in dismissing it entirely.
 

Pestilence

Newbie
Jul 8, 2017
69
84
Is it not strange how someone here can talk of ethics and morality, whist pirating.
I don't understand how you can equate a discussion on a forum (pirate or not) to pirating. You just assume everyone is here to pirate as a mere projection of what you are here to do. Can you point me to any other notable forum that gives as much insight into adult games then this one? I'd really love to hear it because frankly I'm unaware of them tbh as I only stumbled here looking for mods and also legally own over 500 titles bought and paid for so the idea that you know anything about what I'm doing here "is silly". Also you just made your stance on pirating very obvious, it doesn't mean I hold the same opinion as you.
 

LazyName

Member
Aug 17, 2017
130
349
I wont argue nuances about the single dollar, "its silly". However I will ask why isn't morality important when its specifically why I'm addressing him as a POS? You're attempting to argue with my statement whilst simultaneously dismissing the very foundation on which its predicated. You can't have your cake and eat it too. So either you accept that its my opinion and move on. Or you don't and question what actual moral issue I'm referring too rather then attempting a sleight of hand in dismissing it entirely.
To be totally clear i'll say what i think youre saying and if its wrong you can correct me. You think its immoral for him to accept money from patrons because hes taking advantage of them. My response is that the patrons know full well who kyle is and how he conducts himself. If the patrons have this knowledge and continue to support him then they arent being taken advantage of. Theyre fans of his game and are perfectly capable of stopping and continuing their donations as they see fit. Other criticisms like him being incompetent and the like don't need to be tied to whether or not hes performing grave injustices of morality. Plus you're totally welcome to consider someone a PoS for being lazy.
 

Joshua Tree

Conversation Conqueror
Jul 10, 2017
6,158
6,571
Is it not strange how someone here can talk of ethics and morality, whist pirating.
People pirate for different reasons. You not necessary a person of bad morale or ethics just because you pirate. Back in the day I used to copy a lot and when internet became a thing, download. This was more done due to lack of financial means, rather than just want to have everything for free. Also its not your strongest argument on a site such as this.

I see this as a site to find new stuff. If I end up see something I like or get interested in, I might support the creator a couple months to tip the jar, but I have no real desire to keep support month after month. I rather spread it out on different creators.
 

Joshua Tree

Conversation Conqueror
Jul 10, 2017
6,158
6,571
In both your analogies the people being taken advantage of are clearly disadvantaged either through a childhood of grooming by an authority figure or by the deception their government. However i can acknowledge that the people who donated in the month of january operating under the idea that the release date was promised were pretty fucked. While it was in their power to not be fucked i.e. waiting until after january 25th to decide whether or not to contribute I dont think its fair to blame them for kyles shortcomings. I think setting deadlines and missing them is by far the most dubious thing kyle does but to that end patrons have every right to end their donation and never look back. Again just because people are unhappy and critical of Gumdrop doesnt mean its a matter of ethics or morality. Each of us can decide on our own if we think kyle is good enough at his work to support and even argue about it and disagree e.g. this threads discussion. He can be held accountable and judged as an ineffective creator the consequences of which would be potential patrons being scared off and his current patrons moving on. You might try to argue that he still makes too much money on patreon but thats not for you to decide. My problem is when we take that a step further and start trying pass judgement on whether kyle is a bad person.
In the xmas release he did touch about not meeting the 25th deadline though and he understod if people removed their support. It's not like he been selling it right up to the 25th. If people support after that, its due to free will.

In regard of setting deadlines and breaking them, that is nothing new or unheard of in the gaming industry as whole though. Heck you have even games get ingame cash shops and pay 2 win aspects after they been released and had a beta/demo period. Just because some does it, doesn't make it okay though.
 

Joshua Tree

Conversation Conqueror
Jul 10, 2017
6,158
6,571
Certainly not a death sentence, I never read any post suggesting anything of the sort. However there is a case to be made about holding individuals accountable, otherwise one can objectively expect to see many more Gumdrops in the future. If we remove personal responsibility and the consequences of our actions out of the equation, things tend go downhill from there. His patrons are propagating this effect ad nauseam. It really doesn't take a genius to figure this out.
I agree; You should be held accountable if you keep fail deliver over and over. But as long as it's not a crime, nor anything we really can do about. Apart from vote with your money and stop support creators that fault at this. It's like politicians that keep fail on deliver, they will have a hard time get re-elected again. His consequence of failing to deliver is obtaining a shoddy reputation and lose support.

But there is still those that will keep support him and believe in him no matter what anyone say or do, until they decide for themselves.

There is a lot of creators that should been held accountable for failure to deliver in this regard though. There is those that keep start new projects over and over and abandon what they were working on. So you wouldn't necessary know what you support from one day to the next. With the whole "oversight" and rules from Patreon on what you could and could not do, there is those that rolled over, and what you supported turned out to be something else. Should we call these for sell outs? Isn't they doing it just for the money in that regard then? Wouldn't that make a lot of them scam artists?

We can only hold all of them accountable buy stop support them. But there will be those that will keep support them regardless what we say or do. Name calling and verbal abuse, doesn't make one difference what so ever except add to the toxic pool.
 

sr.

Newbie
May 13, 2018
15
17
Missing deadlines is not unethical ...it's laziness

Laziness which leads to breaking of promises, made to the people supporting (the lazy person) ....is ethical??
 

batman666

Member
Donor
Jun 18, 2017
277
565
How are people still supporting this dev? Why?

He isn't to be blamed, tbh. He's making thousands of dollars per month even though he practically abandoned the project.

I bet some people have spent enough money on this dev's patreon page to buy all the DAZ models themselves and remake the game.
 
2.10 star(s) 191 Votes