You made my day with this sentence! I nearly spewed my evening cocoa from laughing about something so far removed from the actual situation! This makes it clear you did not understand one iota from what I wrote about. My opinion of gumdrop is partly not printable, but I feel nothing for or against him, because I do not know this near-certain con man.Show us on the dolly where GD touched you, because he obviously hurt your feelings.
Unlike some other projects, I have no money at stake here. I considered pledging, but then his first lies came out and one of my own rules is: I do not give money to proven liars. Gumdrop can go jump in the lake for all I care, but there are zero feelings involved.
It is far more interesting what is your interest here, because there must be some feelings/stuff involved for you to do this defence. You pretend to be a random guy, but no random guy would do this to the extend you do. I comment on some topics here in the thread now and then, thats my whole involvment beside amusement about the memes.
You on the other hand are on a defensive crusade for gumdrop, therefore you cannot be a random guy. The average fellow would write some positive post for gumsdrop and that would it be. You instead, "Mr. average fellow", have written a ton of defensive posts for gumdrop, no matter the quality of some and this doesn´t fit the average user type.
Which leads to my next point: Once again you evaded any true answer what your relation to gumdrop is. Remember that even a moderator told you that considering your behaviour and non-answers it is normal that you are under suspicion to be gumdrop in disguise or a cheerleader of him? And the longer this goes on, you can deny all you want, but there has to be a relation between you and gumdrop, what form that may be. You are obviously too involved to be uninvolved.
Evidence/Hints: I do not know off the cuff how many posts from other users and me already pointed out the hints/evidence of the falseness (e.g. proven lies, etc.) of gumdrop, which you never acknowledged or glossed over. Especially your (and gumdrops) cavalier attitude about the spirit of agreements might be legal, but it is not inspiring trust in either of you. Since up to now you never acknowleged hints and evidence, I simply chose to not repeat it.
But enough for now, neither you or gumdrop are important enough for me to miss a second cup of cocoa.