- Dec 9, 2018
- 455
- 690
Maybe comeback next month bcos nobody knows when update will come. Even his patrons losing patience to gumdrop
What I'm about to say is absolute bs, but just imagine that out of nowhere, GD releases the full game with 5-10 gigs worth of content. Now that would be one of the biggest anime betrayals of this year.
Sometimes I wonder how many of these people are his discord cheerleaders pretending to be just randoms.
A reminder to those still pledging: read about the sunk cost fallacy
The ignorance here seems to also stem from people being completely unaware of the work required to produce a game which has no advanced mechanics, no original assets, no complex post-processing, no branching, a trivial codebase, etc.
Compare this train wreck with the content produced by people like Dr PinkCake, Super Alex and NOTvil. What this dude is pulling out is a scam, there is no way around it. Daydreaming about it not being a scam serves no purpose other than to keep tricking new people into pledging to a scammer.
To be clear, with the money this dude was making in 2018, the entire game could have been finished a few months ago (this is not a game like Monster Girl Island which is quite complex so detecting the scam is harder). A pattern you usually see with successful non-scammers is that they create a simple game as their first (like this one), then they finish it in like a year and move on to a more complex one.
But this person isn't interested in any of that, even as profits decline, because this is almost surely a scam. The profits/work ratio is massive, and he almost certainly has no intentions of ever making another game (without rebranding at least). You are paying a dude for a year for him to advertise a non-existent product, how crazy is that? even if you pledge, why not ask for evidence of work?
A reminder to those still pledging: read about the sunk cost fallacy
You must be registered to see the links
The ignorance here seems to also stem from people being completely unaware of the work required to produce a game which has no advanced mechanics, no original assets, no complex post-processing, no branching, a trivial codebase, etc.
Compare this train wreck with the content produced by people like Dr PinkCake, Super Alex and NOTvil. What this dude is pulling out is a scam, there is no way around it. Daydreaming about it not being a scam serves no purpose other than to keep tricking new people into pledging to a scammer.
To be clear, with the money this dude was making in 2018, the entire game could have been finished a few months ago (this is not a game like Monster Girl Island which is quite complex so detecting the scam is harder). A pattern you usually see with successful non-scammers is that they create a simple game as their first (like this one), then they finish it in like a year and move on to a more complex one.
But this person isn't interested in any of that, even as profits decline, because this is almost surely a scam. The profits/work ratio is massive, and he almost certainly has no intentions of ever making another game (without rebranding at least). You are paying a dude for a year for him to advertise a non-existent product, how crazy is that? even if you pledge, why not ask for evidence of work?
Last edited:
- Aug 20, 2018
- 1,553
- 3,968
The only update your gonna get when GD decides to hit you from the back.Ouch that sure hurts... 
- Jul 10, 2017
- 6,158
- 6,571
Since when have money been the deciding factor of when something can get completed or not? There is plenty of train wrecked games out there that been funded through the roof and still failed to complete or anything to show for. Also by your standard, a game such as Summertime Saga should been completed ages ago due to the fact its pulling 50k+ a month.
Also, eagerly awaiting you present your new game, as it require no work etc etc....
- Aug 20, 2018
- 1,553
- 3,968
@Joshua Tree the thing that your doing in this thread..is it part time or full time job of yours?
- Jul 10, 2017
- 6,158
- 6,571
Just ignore him (hover over his name and then ignore). He is either a shill or just a troll who is unhealthily attached to porn games. See how he dodges any questions asking for evidence, and how he mangles an open world game with drawn art with a shitty linear game with only daz assets. He is just purposely trolling to boost this thread's activity so the scam gets advertisement.
Last edited:
- Oct 24, 2017
- 83
- 241
[Onhold]? Hahaha Oh, come on!
This game requires a one of a kind tag: [Embezzled]. Or maybe ['EA'ed]. Either would work.
Oh, come on!This game requires a one of a kind tag: [Embezzled]. Or maybe ['EA'ed]. Either would work.
I thought about putting Josh on my ignore list, but then again it is part of the fun seeing his mental gymnastics in trying to defend the undefendables. He is surely a cheerleader of condom drop, eh, gumdrop or himself in disguise. No matter how much he denies it, since his mental aerobics strain credibility and logic many times, esp. his absolute left-corner examples, which are mostly apples and oranges. Even a free speech fanatic or a SJW would see by now that while there cases of doubt, gumdrop has piled up so much evidence against himself that to 99% he must be a con man. But he is still defending him, so there has to be a relation of some kind or he is gumdrop disguised.
Alternatively Josh is sent from someone with the task of defending the scammers, since he is active in other threads with dubious dev behaviour as well.
- Jul 10, 2017
- 6,158
- 6,571
Waiting for your hard evidence on whatever big crimes he done. Apart from lied about release dates and failed to deliver on said release dates? If people silly and throw their cash at him, that is on them, and not a crime. Unless you want to make "being stupid" a crime? If you want to call someone out, then call them out on what they actually done, or rather in this case, haven't done.
Still waiting for those screenshots @lostraven asked @Major Wanker for in regard of the "secret room" etc back at page 420. Because, actual facts so much nicer than claims and accusations.
Also waiting for facts and evidence of all the other stuff he been accused of, because you don't want to just come across as big mouths with no substance do you? (also, if all you left with is point out he lied and failed to provide at dead lines, which I already stated above, you fail...)
Come on @Turret, post your evidence and facts. You are not just another Alex Jones clone are you?
- Dec 9, 2018
- 455
- 690
i made a comment on that 2 days ago and im still waiting for Major Wanker evidence too.
he just too afraid to release the update remember how patreon changed their rules regarding of incestous act and this game resembles the act of incest on this very title, so he never release the updates to his patron or he will lose everything he build this far, so he keep taking free money and write the false hope without even working to this project[Onhold]? Hahaha
This game requires a one of a kind tag: [Embezzled]. Or maybe ['EA'ed]. Either would work.
- Jul 10, 2017
- 6,158
- 6,571
Oh dear, do you mean there actually could be a reason for his alternative support/pay method outside of Patreon?
Ah, the bark is on, I must have hit something sensitive. Great! I see you start counter questions at once, trying again to evade anything related to you and your relation to gumdrop. That´s what I wanted to read about, not you drumming the words of a contract instead of the spirit anew.
We all know that you, eh, gumdrop did not do anything wrong on the paper, but violated the spirit of an agreement. From someone in the free economy: Do you or gumdrop know what oils the market? Some trust that it will go on tomorrow and that most persons in the market honour agreements in spirit and not only what is written on the paper.
But since you do not even see why there has to be a minimum of trust I do not repeat the arguments. Others and I already told you more than once why and what there are many hints that gumdrop does not seem koscher at all. Instead we get platitudes and supposed examples of other developers being like gumdrop, when it is obvious you throw apples and oranges together to defend gumdrop. @WinterW has it right when he sees your tries as mangling other devs because you will find only very few like gumdrop.
Congratulations that you, eh, gumdrop found a way to suck down money without being able to be caught by the law.. And that you found enough poor sods to fall for the trap. But remember Karma is a bitch.
But that is not important, I wanted to see your reaction to my and WinterW´s posts. I am now convinced you are gumdrop or someone close to him. No random guy with zero relation to gumdrop would go to the lengths (and the minutiae) and time consumption you do in defending him. Especially a random fellow would have no need to defend rather agressively. Tell him that he had the chance to become a good developer until the money got into his head.
- Jul 10, 2017
- 6,158
- 6,571
Congratulations of failing the challenge to provide the evidence you yacked about. Also, stating that lash out at someone for what they actually have done. Is not defending the person. It's about what you can prove the person done.
Accuse me of being GD with no evidence or facts at all. Just prove you lashing out again to deflect on provide any facts or evidence, you are little more than a blabber mouth. If you want at least come across as some what serious, get some facts to stand your ground on.
Show us on the dolly where GD touched you, because he obviously hurt your feelings.
- Mar 7, 2019
- 1,543
- 1,309
With this game I don't get the obsession with the weird X girl friend and her crazy daughter..They're a couple of sociopaths..
- Jul 27, 2018
- 432
- 749
You made my day with this sentence! I nearly spewed my evening cocoa from laughing about something so far removed from the actual situation! This makes it clear you did not understand one iota from what I wrote about. My opinion of gumdrop is partly not printable, but I feel nothing for or against him, because I do not know this near-certain con man.Unlike some other projects, I have no money at stake here. I considered pledging, but then his first lies came out and one of my own rules is: I do not give money to proven liars. Gumdrop can go jump in the lake for all I care, but there are zero feelings involved.
It is far more interesting what is your interest here, because there must be some feelings/stuff involved for you to do this defence. You pretend to be a random guy, but no random guy would do this to the extend you do. I comment on some topics here in the thread now and then, thats my whole involvment beside amusement about the memes.
You on the other hand are on a defensive crusade for gumdrop, therefore you cannot be a random guy. The average fellow would write some positive post for gumsdrop and that would it be. You instead, "Mr. average fellow", have written a ton of defensive posts for gumdrop, no matter the quality of some and this doesn´t fit the average user type.
Which leads to my next point: Once again you evaded any true answer what your relation to gumdrop is. Remember that even a moderator told you that considering your behaviour and non-answers it is normal that you are under suspicion to be gumdrop in disguise or a cheerleader of him? And the longer this goes on, you can deny all you want, but there has to be a relation between you and gumdrop, what form that may be. You are obviously too involved to be uninvolved.
Evidence/Hints: I do not know off the cuff how many posts from other users and me already pointed out the hints/evidence of the falseness (e.g. proven lies, etc.) of gumdrop, which you never acknowledged or glossed over. Especially your (and gumdrops) cavalier attitude about the spirit of agreements might be legal, but it is not inspiring trust in either of you. Since up to now you never acknowleged hints and evidence, I simply chose to not repeat it.
But enough for now, neither you or gumdrop are important enough for me to miss a second cup of cocoa.
- Jul 10, 2017
- 6,158
- 6,571
lol.. when I say in the post above, which you reply to, that accuse GD of lying etc is something that can be proven, how is that not acknowledge the fact he lied and been less than truthful? sigh.
Unlike some other projects, I have no money at stake here. I considered pledging, but then his first lies came out and one of my own rules is: I do not give money to proven liars. Gumdrop can go jump in the lake for all I care, but there are zero feelings involved.
It is far more interesting what is your interest here, because there must be some feelings/stuff involved for you to do this defence. You pretend to be a random guy, but no random guy would do this to the extend you do. I comment on some topics here in the thread now and then, thats my whole involvment beside amusement about the memes.
You on the other hand are on a defensive crusade for gumdrop, therefore you cannot be a random guy. The average fellow would write some positive post for gumsdrop and that would it be. You instead, "Mr. average fellow", have written a ton of defensive posts for gumdrop, no matter the quality of some and this doesn´t fit the average user type.
Which leads to my next point: Once again you evaded any true answer what your relation to gumdrop is. Remember that even a moderator told you that considering your behaviour and non-answers it is normal that you are under suspicion to be gumdrop in disguise or a cheerleader of him? And the longer this goes on, you can deny all you want, but there has to be a relation between you and gumdrop, what form that may be. You are obviously too involved to be uninvolved.
Evidence/Hints: I do not know off the cuff how many posts from other users and me already pointed out the hints/evidence of the falseness (e.g. proven lies, etc.) of gumdrop, which you never acknowledged or glossed over. Especially your (and gumdrops) cavalier attitude about the spirit of agreements might be legal, but it is not inspiring trust in either of you. Since up to now you never acknowleged hints and evidence, I simply chose to not repeat it.
But enough for now, neither you or gumdrop are important enough for me to miss a second cup of cocoa.
I did pledge 3 months over a year ago to GD, that is as far as my relationship with him goes, and I'm in the same boat as a lot of his ex patrons there. (something I said a few times over already in this thread) Do you find it's strange that some people might speak up when people get accused without any evidence or facts? Through the course of this thread he been accused of money laundering, doing child erotica, and other far fetched things. There is no need to spin a lot of shit about someone, when what the person already did (or didn't do), is enough to earn him a bad rep.
tbh, thinking back I never said anything particular good about GD either. Liked the game?, sure.. so did many other butt hurt people here. As I said earlier, this thread got a "either you with us, or against us" mentality. That type of thing work rather badly out in the real world.