Ah, the bark is on, I must have hit something sensitive. Great! I see you start counter questions at once, trying again to evade anything related to you and your relation to gumdrop. That´s what I wanted to read about, not you drumming the words of a contract instead of the spirit anew.
We all know that you, eh, gumdrop did not do anything wrong on the paper, but violated the spirit of an agreement. From someone in the free economy: Do you or gumdrop know what oils the market? Some trust that it will go on tomorrow and that most persons in the market honour agreements in spirit and not only what is written on the paper.
But since you do not even see why there has to be a minimum of trust I do not repeat the arguments. Others and I already told you more than once why and what there are many hints that gumdrop does not seem koscher at all. Instead we get platitudes and supposed examples of other developers being like gumdrop, when it is obvious you throw apples and oranges together to defend gumdrop.
@WinterW has it right when he sees your tries as mangling other devs because you will find only very few like gumdrop.
Congratulations that you, eh, gumdrop found a way to suck down money without being able to be caught by the law.. And that you found enough poor sods to fall for the trap. But remember Karma is a bitch.
But that is not important, I wanted to see your reaction to my and WinterW´s posts. I am now convinced you are gumdrop or someone close to him. No random guy with zero relation to gumdrop would go to the lengths (and the minutiae) and time consumption you do in defending him. Especially a random fellow would have no need to defend rather agressively. Tell him that he had the chance to become a good developer until the money got into his head.