- Jul 30, 2017
- 2,092
- 3,258
Was it a turn on to see the dickgirl Alex being fucked by the boss? (If I were to answer this question, I'd say yes, it did result in a turn on.)
Things to note:
1. Boss was more dominant than the dickgirl Alex.
2. Dickgirl alex is more dominant than the MC.
3. Dickgirl alex is considered a switch; term used to describe one who can be dom and sub.
Here's a potentially tricky question: Is it a turn on to see Alex the dickgirl getting fucked by the Boss, then a few days later, Alex the dickgirl fucks the MC in the ass; Alex is the dominant one, despite having seen her submit to the boss a few days ago?
Notice how the developer made the MC say, "that's a bit weird", when the MC saw the dickgirl Alex being in a submissive position; taking the boss man's dick. The fact that the developer added that part justifies why we should discuss this concept in depth. From a writing perspective, there's definitely confusion there, a kind of confusion I can understand exists, but I can't fully explain or understand it. This is uncharted territory. I don't care about being right, I just want to discover what's right through discussion with you guys.
Let's try to understand the scenario by creating rules?
(A) All dickgirls can be dominant and submissive, some more dominant than others. The concept of a switch is dynamic and fluid. A dickgirl can be 95 dom/5 sub or 95 sub/5 dom.
VS
(B) some dickgirls are 100% dominant and would never be in a submission position, EVER. However, let's say there are rules in place implying all sex is consensual, no matter what; just to save time, and the dickgirl is overpowered by three males; consensually, then fucked by those three males, because they overpowered her; this scenario shows that no matter how dominant the dickgirl is, she can still end up in a submissive position; that's the key point here. [re-read this if you have to, it's an advanced concept, once you understand what I said in its entirety, if you still think I'm wrong, please try to fix it, I'll thoroughly read what you say]
VS
(C) Other ....... Your response?
FINAL THOUGHT: The overall idea here is that no matter how dominant you are, there's always a bigger fish who will fuck you in the ass, VS some men and women who are so dominant, they'd never ever end up in a submissive position, ever.
- (Note: I won't respond to anyone who says, "it's all subjective".)
- (EDIT: Would be awesome to be lucky enough to get the developers ideas/feedback on this topic.)
Things to note:
1. Boss was more dominant than the dickgirl Alex.
2. Dickgirl alex is more dominant than the MC.
3. Dickgirl alex is considered a switch; term used to describe one who can be dom and sub.
Here's a potentially tricky question: Is it a turn on to see Alex the dickgirl getting fucked by the Boss, then a few days later, Alex the dickgirl fucks the MC in the ass; Alex is the dominant one, despite having seen her submit to the boss a few days ago?
Notice how the developer made the MC say, "that's a bit weird", when the MC saw the dickgirl Alex being in a submissive position; taking the boss man's dick. The fact that the developer added that part justifies why we should discuss this concept in depth. From a writing perspective, there's definitely confusion there, a kind of confusion I can understand exists, but I can't fully explain or understand it. This is uncharted territory. I don't care about being right, I just want to discover what's right through discussion with you guys.
Let's try to understand the scenario by creating rules?
(A) All dickgirls can be dominant and submissive, some more dominant than others. The concept of a switch is dynamic and fluid. A dickgirl can be 95 dom/5 sub or 95 sub/5 dom.
VS
(B) some dickgirls are 100% dominant and would never be in a submission position, EVER. However, let's say there are rules in place implying all sex is consensual, no matter what; just to save time, and the dickgirl is overpowered by three males; consensually, then fucked by those three males, because they overpowered her; this scenario shows that no matter how dominant the dickgirl is, she can still end up in a submissive position; that's the key point here. [re-read this if you have to, it's an advanced concept, once you understand what I said in its entirety, if you still think I'm wrong, please try to fix it, I'll thoroughly read what you say]
VS
(C) Other ....... Your response?
FINAL THOUGHT: The overall idea here is that no matter how dominant you are, there's always a bigger fish who will fuck you in the ass, VS some men and women who are so dominant, they'd never ever end up in a submissive position, ever.
- (Note: I won't respond to anyone who says, "it's all subjective".)
- (EDIT: Would be awesome to be lucky enough to get the developers ideas/feedback on this topic.)
Last edited:
