- Jan 19, 2020
- 12,382
- 48,881
The padded room might not be so bad, but the food probably sucks... let's pass on it, lmao. Besides, I'm certain they don't serve my brand of whiskey.Well, maybe I should get myself one of those jackets!
- Thread starter Sancho1969
- Start date
- Apr 7, 2018
- 2,395
- 5,362
The overlap is due to what I pointed out earlier:
Python:
style block2_multiple2_say_window:
yalign -0.2- Jan 19, 2020
- 12,382
- 48,881
CircleJerker Bibifoc I got caught having to finish another project and didn't get a chance until now to revisit this issue. You're not going to believe this. The "fixed" compressed are the same exact scripts as the previous one. The bugs are still there. I didn't even look first before I started porting everything over again and then I saw it... same issue. IF CJ's compressed version has the correct scripts from the current uncompressed then the uncompressed scripts in the VN's OP are borked. Otherwise CJ doesn't have the correct version. That's the only two things I reckon are at play here. Bibifoc, are you sure the VN's OP uncompressed has the correct scripts? I can't verify as I'm at my cabin house in the middle of the National Forest and on shit bandwidth (getting a signal is tough enough, lol). Regards.
- Mar 6, 2021
- 6,629
- 70,246
Checked the scripts of my "fixed" version and they are NOT the same as in the previous unfixed version as both places mentioned in your below quoted post are correct now!
- Jan 19, 2020
- 12,382
- 48,881
...wait... I just DL'd
Eternum-0.3.0-Bugfixed-pc-crunched-fixed.zip and the scripts are the same. WTF?
- Jan 19, 2020
- 12,382
- 48,881
Motherfuck...... dude, now you're just fucking with me. Do you realize that in your current file the RPY's are correct and the RPYC's are WRONG! Holy shit brother !!!!
I had previously automatically converted the RPYC's which gave me the same buggy code, but your supplied RPY's are correct. Damnit brother, lmao.
The below are directly from your file... unarchive the RPYC and compare....they are not the same, lol
- Mar 6, 2021
- 6,629
- 70,246
- Jan 19, 2020
- 12,382
- 48,881
CircleJerker Yep, we might have to go on amazon and order those jackets soon. I'll get busy and get the mod corrected. I appreciate you sticking in there, we'll get it sorted bud. Have a great evening... I'm gonna grab another drink and hit the editor. Regards.
- Jan 19, 2020
- 12,382
- 48,881
I dunno, never seen it before.
Here's from the RPYC:
mc "Sup' man! Good to see you." with dis (multiple=2) (wrong)Here's from the RPY:
mc "Sup' man! Good to see you." (multiple=2) with dis (correct)Since RPY's are read in priority over RPYC's then no harm, no foul... but really odd to say the least.
- Jan 19, 2020
- 12,382
- 48,881
- Apr 7, 2018
- 2,395
- 5,362
It seems things are ok now but just for that, I can tell RPYs I posted earlier in this thread are correct. I got them directly from the dev, not F95.
- Jan 19, 2020
- 12,382
- 48,881
Good morning. I've updated the links in the OP with current final dual-dialogue boxes (regardless of which one the player chooses in SanchoOptions). All should be well now in all screen resolutions. Le me know if you find any issues. Regards.
- Jan 19, 2020
- 12,382
- 48,881
Good morning. Wrong thread bud. I didn't make the game. SanchoMod doesn't do hair.
- Jul 13, 2017
- 63
- 114
- Jan 19, 2020
- 12,382
- 48,881
- Aug 11, 2017
- 10,380
- 83,590
- Jan 19, 2020
- 12,382
- 48,881
???
I'm not sure I understand where you're coming from but ok, fair enough. Knock yourself out modifiying whatever you want without my work involved. Your mod is yours. Mine is mine. I've never altered any dev's dialogue scripting other than renaming characters to preserve their true intent. I view my work as enhancing their work, not altering it's core.