- May 21, 2017
- 3,671
- 21,180
You're basically arguing that, in a vacuum, your arguments are correct because they are logical. The point, however, is that we're not talking about the logic of your argument, but rather if it can be indeed be applied to the context of the game's narrative, where you originally argued that:What do you think "I don't think" means??
a) the theme is Cyberpunk, and therefore is not dualistic
b) Luna's powers can be construed as the product of mental derangement or drugs
Both of which are refuted based on what's foreshadowed prior and fully refuted with the current lore dump and Luna's childhood backstory reveal.
And no, you don't get to save face by saying "well my argument is still logical" because that wasn't what you were pushing for when you called out my original post saying I should "stick to rational philosophical materialism." You made a prediction/argument about the plot/lore and it turned out wrong, I pointed that it turned out wrong. Simple as.