Lmao proof of what? That it's AI? That I draw? I guess you expect artists to detect AI art 1:1 though huh? I'm not gonna dox myself and give you my portfolio, and I don't really care if you believe that I don't know anything about drawing.
edit: was bored, so here's a quick sketch - my "proof" that I do know better than laymen
You must be registered to see the links
. If you want something more than a sketch you better pay me, because I'm not wasting a day to prove internet randos wrong.
The fuck does this even mean - the mechanical side? Mistakenly or not - calling something AI means I've never drawn? I guess you know me better than I know myself and my years of drawing. I guess that sketch I made had zero mechanics and required zero knowledge.
Holy non sequitur. On your dogshit analogy - I'm not a wine taste tester, I'm the one making the damn wine. Even if I'm wrong in this instance, I can't tell what age wine is but I can
generally tell whether it's spoiled. Funny how artists making weird mistakes in drawing is completely passable, but another artist making a mistake in determining AI art is absolutely unforgivable.
Even though you and the other guy engaged in bad faith, I admit the illustrator is an actual artist after looking at their
You must be registered to see the links
, but the dev did consider using
You must be registered to see the links
at some point. I'll also say I was hasty in my judgement because I based it on the scenery in the biking CG, which I would now assume was done by the dev - nonsensical line weights, incorrect vanishing points, wonky architecture as pictured in the above post, etc. The dev does have some basic artistic knowledge after looking at their cien, but their lack of fundamentals evident by their own comments leads me to believe they created the background, which is why I was suspicious in the first place.