Why? New to the Internet? People parodying popular characters for porn is nothing new, it's LITERALLY the definition of Rule 34, why you whining about it now? What does it matter what he name is? Or do you seriously think the author is trying to be sneaky and trying to hide the fact that this is obviously based on Eula and hope no one figures it out? Give me a break.
Right? I don't need to provide my portfolio to prove shit to randos on the internet. I've also experimented with AI (locally, not on a random site) myself to see how it works. The amount of rage I feel in these replies are kinda hilarious. I don't know how they expect me to give "proof" when I literally pointed out inconsistencies that artists don't often make. Once or twice every now and then sure, but all these signs in one work is just obvious.Talk about getting offended over nothing
I can assure you that even the most amateur artist is consistent enough be able to count between THREE shapes and ELEVEN. While it would vary IRL due to hair movement, it wouldn't change in size to that degree. That combined with the competely different hair color - no artist would make such stupid mistakes that often if they were skilled enough to draw at that level. Even assuming they couldn't could numbers higher than the fingers they have, drawing programs literally save the palette you use - using a completely different shade is just wild.
Pointing out it's animated - you can animate AI art the same way you L2D animate any other drawing.
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content.
Log in or register now.
Last edited:
Lmao proof of what? That it's AI? That I draw? I guess you expect artists to detect AI art 1:1 though huh? I'm not gonna dox myself and give you my portfolio, and I don't really care if you believe that I don't know anything about drawing.
edit: was bored, so here's a quick sketch - my "proof" that I do know better than laymen
You must be registered to see the links
. If you want something more than a sketch you better pay me, because I'm not wasting a day to prove internet randos wrong.The fuck does this even mean - the mechanical side? Mistakenly or not - calling something AI means I've never drawn? I guess you know me better than I know myself and my years of drawing. I guess that sketch I made had zero mechanics and required zero knowledge.
Holy non sequitur. On your dogshit analogy - I'm not a wine taste tester, I'm the one making the damn wine. Even if I'm wrong in this instance, I can't tell what age wine is but I can generally tell whether it's spoiled. Funny how artists making weird mistakes in drawing is completely passable, but another artist making a mistake in determining AI art is absolutely unforgivable.
Even though you and the other guy engaged in bad faith, I admit the illustrator is an actual artist after looking at their
You must be registered to see the links
, but the dev did consider using
You must be registered to see the links
at some point. I'll also say I was hasty in my judgement because I based it on the scenery in the biking CG, which I would now assume was done by the dev - nonsensical line weights, incorrect vanishing points, wonky architecture as pictured in the above post, etc. The dev does have some basic artistic knowledge after looking at their cien, but their lack of fundamentals evident by their own comments leads me to believe they created the background, which is why I was suspicious in the first place.
Last edited:
- Aug 12, 2019
- 117
- 136
You came off as a pretentious asshole so I in kind gave you a response that matched. Didn't take much but I'm going to move on now that we have our conclusion regarding this game. Decent sketch by the way.
Fair enough. That said, I can't really think of a way to mention "laymen" and being "untrained" without sounding pretentious, but I'm also not going to post credentials every time or preface everything with "I'm an artist, I draw." That's just the reality when I've spent time learning to draw and the vast majority of people haven't. It doesn't make me special or anything, it's just a skill like any other. It's not meant to be demeaning, even though I see it can come across that way. Thanks for the compliment.
- Feb 14, 2018
- 114
- 209
That applies to a lot of tags. Exhibitionism? Who knows, maybe it's going to be a game literally about exhibitionism and nothing else, maybe subtle like going commando and some quick flashes, maybe not so subtle and she's just going to walk around naked right from the start.
Or maybe there will be just a single scene where she has sex in an empty park
Well, it makes sense that "is NTR skippable" became the meme rather than exhibitionism because people feel more strongly toward the former. I don't think many people here are disgusted by the thought of public indecency, though that's funny to imagine.
- Feb 14, 2018
- 114
- 209
- Aug 4, 2021
- 669
- 35
- Apr 28, 2017
- 296
- 816
ye this game definitely used AI. The tranlation just too "formal", the artstiyle of her body looked "fake". But unlike the majority of "AI game" the author of this game had done a decent job at polishing this game so it doesn't made you immediately said "another AI bullshit game" after launching it up, ye not bad at all
Why the hell did the dev put a fucking delete button right next to the load button, without turning back after you clicked?
