It's is funny how you cut out context out my quotes to fit your needs.I even went out of my way explaining why and how she can pass as a young adult. I study art so I'm well aware of body types, ages, proportions, canons etc.
Your words, I went with this hypotetical case, and how it would create even more issues.
Apparently, providing sound arguments that you can't counter with anything else than a "no" is weaseling out?
Like Purple said, your original strawman fallacy (people asking for toddlers) came off as a claim of moral superiority, whether you were aware of it or not.
Yeah, we already know other people's preferences bother you. We simply pointed how it's a completely subjective issue, to which your better arguments have been "no" "no u" "gtfo" "weaseling" "it's my opinion". Throwing a fit (at me of all people) won't help your case at all.
Things like people automatically expecting an updated, cracked version and not using the search bar are what make it hilarious indeed.
Just a page ago or so I explained why Denuvo, online functionalities, lack of interest from the cracking scene and the sorry state of the "game" means no cracked version anytime soon. 0.36 was peak, anyways.
"Body is only one aspect how persons age is perceived. If Galatea had face of the celebrities mentioned I would have no issue with her. But guess what? Her face shape is that of a kid and she has pigtails, hairstyle strongly associated with underage girls. I wonder if she is gonna get adult looking outfits or school outfit and cute underwear with cat/bear on it. "
In the context it is obvious I'm talking about the celebrities as example of "adult looking faces" opposite to the kid shaped face Galatea has. Bolded the part you cut out and then claimed I want have to have same face as celebrities.
"When every aspect of a character is pointing to her being underage, when she had to go through multiple iterations in order to be allowed on steam, you are not gonna convince me she is supposed to be anything else but underage character and I’m weird not being comfortable looking at her. "
You derail to "you don't want to accept her as adult because of your inner issues" not because she was made just to barely pass the cut off line, not because all aspects suggest young age. Then it was "Again, if explicit content of non-voluptuous adult females makes you uncomfortable, that's an inner issue of you'
To : I will repeat from my first post : "I feel uncomfortable looking at her and I don't want to be forced into lobby where she is undressed let alone having sex." You reply with
I'm still looking where in my sentence I'm bothered by other's people preferences.Yeah, we already know other people's preferences bother you. We simply pointed how it's a completely subjective issue, to which your better arguments have been "no" "no u" "gtfo" "weaseling" "it's my opinion". Throwing a fit (at me of all people) won't help your case at all.
Sound arguments? You mean misrepresentation of my arguments and then claiming "It's you issue"?Apparently, providing sound arguments that you can't counter with anything else than a "no" is weaseling out?
Like Purple said, your original strawman fallacy (people asking for toddlers) came off as a claim of moral superiority, whether you were aware of it or not.
It was hyperbole not strawman fallacy, it was just a jab at your statement expressing how Galatea doesn't look like herself. Then i express my preference and it is imporant here becasue the "game" forces us to share space , send likes , borrow scenes etc. If that is expresing moral superiority and being bothered by others preferences - sure. But the way i see, it is you finding issue with my preferences, with the fact that you can't make me accept her as adult, with the fact that we need separate lobbies like is the case with xeno stuff.