- Jan 3, 2019
- 179
- 682
How silly of me to assume that statements likeYou may notice I didn't target the author about the story, I targeted the STORY.
I am glad you are still in school, its obvious you need better education... See thats an example of an Ad hominem attack.
andYou have a serious problem with deciding everyone that doesn't like the "game" is ranting about multiple choices.
It seems like you have problems with your own choice in this matter and are projecting.
as being directed to the story, and not as targeting the author. Or have you taken to using the term "you" when speaking to stories?If it wasn't your intention you may want to stop projecting when people are saying they find something they dislike that its because they can't themselves make choices in the story.
A perfect description, from my point of view, of what YOU are doing to Rich. Thank you for summing it up so nicely.Thats called Ad hominem, its what people do when they can't argue facts and so resort to personal attacks.
Of course. That is exactly what Spoondadevil23 did. Rich thanked him for his input, and for the fact that it was presented in a constructive manner, and proceeded to explain a bit of his own thinking. And your reaction was to ridicule Rich with a response that was in no way constructively-phrased, and which included personal attacks.Lastly people have a right to express their dislike over a story and/or suggest what they feel are improvements.
The Creator can not very well improve or know if people are taking the story as intended WITHOUT it.
I stand corrected. Care to provide some links so that we may provide similar feedback on your creations?Your assumption that I have never made a game is wrong, I started making mods for games almost 20 years ago and eventually into making games themselves.