- Aug 30, 2016
- 397
- 698
It still works perfectly. It will work regardless of the version of the game.
I want to hand it to the dev. The first instalment or two of this were pretty much unplayable, for one reason and another. Coming back to it now, it's so much better, and a lot of fun to play. Huge improvement, and in just a few months.
- Jan 21, 2021
- 1,298
- 2,474
The Germans are very direct people!
- Jul 30, 2017
- 527
- 1,108
As of current update there is one avoidable scene with a trans girl, so it's shemale, rather than futa.
- Jan 21, 2021
- 1,298
- 2,474
Multiprotag is because you can play as the son in a few chapters, he has a gf and adventures of his own.
The swinging is just that, there are swinging scenes in the game but they are entirely optional.
There is no real NTR in this from what I have played but this is a "fuckfest" type of VN so don't go into it expecting a typical harem.
- Mar 10, 2024
- 61
- 123
There is a difference between swinging and NTR - as in the voluntary sharing of partners without any aspects of humiliation.
Unless of course you interpret NTR as: any woman in an avn should be the sole property of the MC, even if they're not their partner - which is beside the point.
So, no, NTR would be a misleading tag, while "swinging" is correctly applied. You might want to avoid that, then.
- Mar 10, 2024
- 61
- 123
I just came across this game and it's so funny in it's German-ness, especially the "pragmatic sex positivity". Everyone's just DTF and so non-chalant about it.
But I kind of like how fetish content is presented, always making sure that consent is paramount. Feels very "real" in that aspect.
But I kind of like how fetish content is presented, always making sure that consent is paramount. Feels very "real" in that aspect.
- Mar 10, 2024
- 61
- 123
Sure, Haitians eat dogs, we fuck 'em.
- Mar 10, 2024
- 61
- 123
- Jul 30, 2017
- 527
- 1,108
Nobody fucks animals, cause it's sick. It's just a kink for people. Like fucking your mom or sister. There is nothing German or Russian about it. It's a taboo thing, so games do it. In Japanese games it's there to humiliate woman. Everyone does it, but just in a fantasy. I hope. Don't tell me otherwise. Sick.
- Mar 10, 2024
- 61
- 123
Eh, of course it exists, I don't think there's any mammal save from human perversion.
My earlier statement about sex positivity and consent in fetishes does not apply to bestiality by the way (I'm not even playing the "special version"), as it is - naturally - not possible to make an animal consent to anything. Therefore, by common law (and sense, for that matter), any sexual interaction with an animal would be deemed abuse.
(That being said, I don't mind that content in a game - given that I can safely avoid it. 3D models can't be violated after all.)
My earlier statement about sex positivity and consent in fetishes does not apply to bestiality by the way (I'm not even playing the "special version"), as it is - naturally - not possible to make an animal consent to anything. Therefore, by common law (and sense, for that matter), any sexual interaction with an animal would be deemed abuse.
(That being said, I don't mind that content in a game - given that I can safely avoid it. 3D models can't be violated after all.
)
Last edited:
- Jul 30, 2017
- 527
- 1,108
Yes. And that is an animal. You compare yourself and you intellect to an animal?
- Mar 10, 2024
- 61
- 123
Hello, that guy speaking.
I thought you were just making an absurd joke, but apparently you wanted to present your remark as a valid argument in an ethical discussion. Well, in that case, you don't want to make an ethical argument from the side of the dog, do you? It might be surprising, but dogs have a severe lack of ethical understanding (or any measurable form of comprehension at all). And that leads me to say that from a *human* point of view, an animal (such as a dog) cannot possibly consent and therefore if a human(!) initiates or coerces an animal into a sexual act, it is by definition abuse.
I thought you were just making an absurd joke, but apparently you wanted to present your remark as a valid argument in an ethical discussion. Well, in that case, you don't want to make an ethical argument from the side of the dog, do you? It might be surprising, but dogs have a severe lack of ethical understanding (or any measurable form of comprehension at all). And that leads me to say that from a *human* point of view, an animal (such as a dog) cannot possibly consent and therefore if a human(!) initiates or coerces an animal into a sexual act, it is by definition abuse.
- Jul 30, 2017
- 527
- 1,108
- Mar 10, 2024
- 61
- 123
No, he's pointing out what everyone else is thinking. You are not using my logic. You apply your poor understanding of my words which leads you to your own fallacious conclusion. It's not up to me to set that straight and I fear that we'll only run in circles from this point on.
- Jul 30, 2017
- 527
- 1,108
That's why I quote you dude. Cause you say the same thing. Why argue? SnakeInTheGrass says animals have no ethics, therefore they can't be held responsible. Then you say they eat other animals, cause they have no ethics. Wtf?
Also, the whole thing started with SnakeInTheGrass saying it's not consensual to fuck animals, then you reacted "animals humping you don't ask for consent". Of course they don't, cause they are fucking animals. That's why I said why are you comparing a dog humping legs with a human consciously deciding to fuck an animal.
- Jul 30, 2017
- 527
- 1,108
