Stan5851
Forum Fanatic
- Oct 18, 2019
- 4,606
- 9,600
- 658
It amused me too. I cited a definition of asexuality taken from a huge article on wikipedia , but this person (isabellapink)Okay I admit it. You have almost left me speechless. Your post is full of some of the most ridiculous garbage I have had the unfortunate experience of reading in this thread. First off I give the dictionary definition of asexual and you dismiss it as wrong and then link a wikipedia page back.
Don't worry about offending me. If you want to believe I'm some asexual lesbian want a be who values my happiness through Monica's continued asexuality, go right ahead. You seemed to have become emotionally unstable through discussing a topic with some random people on the internet. The next time this happens try not to blindly start throwing passive aggressive insults at people who disagree with you. You might learn something.
I agree though that I think we have all said enough on the topic.
responds by giving me a link to the same article and boasting about how well-read she/he is. Yes, I read the whole article and I don't see any contradiction between asexuality and Monica.
I think we are witnessing an act of grand trolling, or is defd©™, who is on the blacklist of many people reading this thread, suddenly decided to get a second account and started trolling from it.
isabellapink , your trolling is too ridiculously predictable and you still have no adequate argument against the fact that Monica is asexual. So,isabellapink, welcome to my blacklist. Now defd©™ won't be bored there alone and you'll be able to exchange your rambling theories with each other.
Last edited: