That is absolutely true. It is also true that people can talk about it and express their opinions.And people could realize that people who remain subscribed to a game are happy enough with the progress and don't need to be saved by white knights. That is what I do. I judge games by what they contain, not what they do not. How often a dev updates is between the dev and his patrons.
In my case, I don't really care about patrons. They're all adults, it's their money, why the frack would I care? My beef is the lack of progress in what is essentially a text based game.
I do not know if the author is purposefully delaying progress to milk his patrons, but I wouldn't be surprised if he was doing that at this stage. I'm just talking about it, I'm not trying to force anyone else to change their position.
So, I don't really want to "save" anyone", but I feel it is VERY important to keep repeating this as to make potential new patrons aware of the issue so that they can make an informed decision. They need to know that they're dealing with a dev who, at best, didn't add almost any content to the game for 5 years or is, at worst, a scammer.
If after knowing that, they still want to support the dev, that's perfectly fine, and reverts back to first point of "adults, making informed decisions about their own money".
Last edited: