- Nov 19, 2017
- 775
- 959
The dilemma in itself is that the game in its current version is still good and worth a 4-5 star rating.
The problem is that there should be 3 points deducted for the way the game is developed.
The slowness of the updates, or the extremely low content for the length of the updates. In addition, the constant delays and postponements, as well as the non-implementation of promised events or content.
FA and Crush give a good example of how there should actually be two rating displays. One for the game (4 stars) and one for the developer/development process. And that is still worth a maximum of 2 stars.
You should also not forget how many players here have already experienced several versions and are therefore always disappointed when a new update comes. Players who are new to the game, on the other hand, will have a decent gaming experience.
The problem is that there should be 3 points deducted for the way the game is developed.
The slowness of the updates, or the extremely low content for the length of the updates. In addition, the constant delays and postponements, as well as the non-implementation of promised events or content.
FA and Crush give a good example of how there should actually be two rating displays. One for the game (4 stars) and one for the developer/development process. And that is still worth a maximum of 2 stars.
You should also not forget how many players here have already experienced several versions and are therefore always disappointed when a new update comes. Players who are new to the game, on the other hand, will have a decent gaming experience.