Thanks for your response, dude.
Each game has its own audience, because not every individual thinks alike, which is great.
You're right, that
is great.
For me it is male protagonist, because Mc is kinda my extension, I project myself into that character. So choosing a female protagonist would be weird or stupid for me, especially in some sex scene, lol (I would get a feeling like I'm getting boned, ffs).
HAHAHA! You're funny, man.
Maybe that works for some other "kinky" ppl, gay to, but for straight guys is pointless and stupid. That's why I'm avoiding all those female protagonist (and non avoidable NTR) games, no matter how good renders or animations are in them. Call me old fashioned, but I don't like that and that's how my mind work.
Alright, where to start?
Where... to... start...? OK, let's all take a deep breath here. Don't worry, we'll make it. We'll make it... together, baby. Just take my hand. You're safe with me.
Firstly, let's start with your idea that female protagonist games are only for 'kinky people', 'gay people', and that for 'straight men' such games are 'pointless and stupid'. This is false. I'm not saying you're judgemental or anything (actually, the very act of me saying that would be judgemental, would be judgemental in and of itself, since feeling the necessity to defend against being labelled as gay, is practically the same as saying there is something wrong with it, but that's a whole other discussion), I'm only saying that those comments are simply and plainly outright false, you know; red-light-hit-the-brakes-wrong. I don't think I really need to explain this to you. I think you know this isn't true. I think you are fully aware that female protagonist games are both being played and developed by straight men as we speak.
Secondly, I would like to go back to this comment:
For me it is male protagonist, because Mc is kinda my extension, I project myself into that character. So choosing a female protagonist would be weird or stupid for me, especially in some sex scene, lol (I would get a feeling like I'm getting boned, ffs).
This is a really interesting comment, because it speaks to the notion that a woman can't
fuck a man, but can only
be fucked by a man. I'm really interested in the underlying psychology of language/'choice of words' and such, you know, so allow me the opportunity to analyze a bit on this comment of yours:
The comment reflects a viewpoint of women as a
passive entity in sexual engagements, the underlying implication being, that a woman can never be
in control of a sexual encounter, that a woman can never take charge, and the woman can thereby only be
the dominated and never the dominator. Your own realization of such viewpoints being 'old fashioned' is actually quite an astute observation, since these ideas hark back to a time-period where female sexuality was opressed and viewed as something shameful. "
Getting boned" is wrong. However: '
Boning someone else' is not only acceptable, but actually a symbol of status. Status
over the aforementioned "boned" individual/ "boned" other. We are now, at this point, engaging in a dialogue regarding genderized power struggles with the sexual encounter between man and woman being our starting point for further discussion. In other words, we are now looking at the sexual encounter itself as a struggle for power. Are you following me here? So, when you state, that you don't want to play as a female, because you are afraid of "getting boned", what you are actually afraid of is losing your (sexual) power; your status of being
above a genderized 'other'.
For further reading, I suggest checking out Judith Butler's books on gender-theory.
Anyway, I hope you learned something from this. I learned a lot.
Love you, man. Kep on keeping on, dude.