1.80 star(s) 5 Votes

Yandere Lover

Member
Jul 28, 2017
471
372
So no Humans, then why is this the Description?

The main idea is to create a sandbox game with a very optimistic approach on sexual inter-species relationship that is based on conses and exploration instead of force and violence. After taming and befriending, you will also be able to gratify your feral friends needs or even experience being a feral creature yourself.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ᴏᴄᴛᴏ

LLz

Member
Feb 2, 2018
170
118
I'm just upset that they gave dinosaurs penises, balls, and vagina. If they were REAL dino fans, they'd know that reptiles don't have these.
Except every dino fan knows that dinosaurs are closer related to birds anyway. (which granted still doesn't have many of these traits other than penis, but still)
 

LellelelLELEL

New Member
Aug 16, 2017
12
38
Okay I never post but here's to settle some stuff.

First of all, bird penis: it's often vestigial. Which means it was there and now doesn't serve evolutionary purpose in most species (with a few exception like ostriches). Such phenotypical traits are often observable on embryos which begin to develop them but don't finalize that process. That seems to indicate that a common ancestor of today's birds did possess a functioning penis.1

As for dinosaurs, though everything we have is speculative- so is everything we know about their eating habits, behaviour, everything that's not been turned into a canvas for rock to occupy, which means a lot. But guess what, that's the rule for every study of past phenomena2, it works by probabilistic inference. Which means studying certain anatomic peculiarities of dinosaur species, comparatively to other species (? closest relatives, ergo crocodilians and birds) and with knowledge of the rules of biology and an understanding of the intertwining of bodily characteristics, we can formulate answers that are more probably true than others.

To get a clear idea, one would have to look into complex scientific litterature, and even a nerd like me doesn't have the time for that :v. Here's a (very) few examples though3, with fairly accessible stuff. But one thing you could do is look at either meta-studies or, since we're all laymen here, vulgarized articles. Here's a few:
The Anatomy of Dinosaur Sex - The Smithsonian, Riley Black
Everything You Wanted to Know About Dinosaur Sex - The Smithsonian, Riley Black (google em)

Those also contain more scientific references in description.

So what are the conclusions? Well based on the stuff I brought up above, plus advances in terms of sexual differenciation (in what is essentially animal-ish rocks), and stuff looking at the structure of eggshelves, hips and such, there's a answer that seems to be rather well accepted and that actually suits the go-to for most internet artists:

Dinosaurs likely had a cloaca, with internal testicles and a retractible penis, with built-in muscles used to erect it. Size is subject to debate, probably in between a bird and crocodilian proportion (so not too big actually). Females have an internal oviduct and only one cloacal opening as well. So here you go:

Cloaca + Retractible penis + Inner balls + No vagina

Thanks for reading, y'all :D

1 - Brennan, P., Birkhead, T., Zyskowski, K., Van der Waag, J. and Prum, R. O. 2008. Independent evolutionary reductions of the phallus in basal birds. Journal of Avian Biology, 39
2 - Tucker, A., 2004, Our knowledge of the past: A philosophy of historiography, Cambridge Press
3 - Carpenter, K., 1999, Eggs, Nests, and Baby Dinosaurs: A Look at Dinosaur Reproduction, Indiana University Press
- Brennan, P., Prum, R., McCracken, K., Sorenson, M., Wilson, R., & Birkhead, T., 2007, Coevolution of Male and Female Genital Morphology in Waterfowl, PLoS ONE, 2
- ISLE, T. E., 2012, The socio-sexual behaviour of extant archosaurs: Implications for understanding dinosaur behaviour, Historical Biology, 21
 
1.80 star(s) 5 Votes