You are literally doing the same thing you are claiming I am. You are not reading. I have already explained where you were wrong multiple times. READ please. You can literally see in the pictures that it's different scenes and a different dick, The floor is different. What more do you want? It's different dick models.
Precisely, it is different scenes. Different angles. Different lighting. There just is no way from these pictures to say it is a different model. There's also no way to say it is the same model. What more do I want? The (presumably) different dicks in pictures where we can actually compare them. Until then I will default to Occam's razor: why should there be different models being used, and not "one in the first couple of scenes then we changed to a better one" but back and forth?
And considering you have been wrong multiple times already (e. g. "the hand covers the whole penis", e. g. ignoring the penis angling towards the camera) I'd say you should get down from the high horse here.
So we can stop being in this stupid circle of you being unable to read.
Everybody is unable to understand the issue except for you?
And yes you did ask why I asked.
View attachment 1361578
I never posed a question.
Ah, okay, I'll cede that, a failure in communication. This "you" wasn't directed at you personally, but the general "you" of anybody reading this, because frankly speaking: measuring pixels to determine the relative size of body parts may be considered a silly endeavour by most. It was meant to be an offhand acknowledgement that my whole post was silly. I am sorry for any misunderstandings that caused.
I made a statement based on what I saw. Which turned out to be so far 1 of 3 instances where the MC has a different dick model. Where his dick is smaller. All of which I have supplied pics of.
And said pics are not able to show to others what you personally see in them. As you may have noticed in this discussion so far you are the only one seeing it.
You keep using the "with in reason" penis as a reference which is how it looks like most of the time which is irrelevant to my comment, which also makes all of your arguments irrelevant to what I originally wrote.
No, I keep saying that everything we can see from your pictures is that the penis is within a certain range, but we cannot say whether it is big or small or whether one is bigger or smaller than any other of your collection due to different perspectives and lighting. But we can see that it isn't "tiny" (which you originally wrote) or 3 inches (which you later estimated).
But I have since showed you all the proof you should need. But you are the one coming after my throat instead and I am just responding to you. Proving where you are wrong. While you don't. You just can't accept that you are wrong and that you are arguing for a different thing altogether.
Funny, that is precisely how I feel about your posts. Although I am not saying "you're wrong" because I do not know whether it is different models. I am only saying that nothing you put forward is sufficient proof. And without sufficient proof I tend to believe in the simpler solution of there only being one penis. (Well, probably two, one flaccid, one erect)
Anyways, enough penis size discussions for me, I will retreat.
