Cartageno
Devoted Member
- Dec 1, 2019
- 8,920
- 15,060
- 876
I would argue that this is not a harem game in the common understanding - there may be endings which qualify for the harem tag from this site but even that isn't certain. But a harem needs love interests, and only a select few probably count as such, most are just fuck buddies.so a harem game (mostly) and now a choice to add NTR with the main LI.
If MC consents or even controls, that isn't NTR anymore. That would be swinging. NTR is a love interest being entangled with somebody against what MC wants.after playing the 2 week, what I could enjoy in the ntr-route:
- they ask u to ntr your girlfriend. (u get to know that after u picked NTR)
now, the MC can "fuck that, no way in hell" or "try to convince the girlfriend to do"
and it should be light stuff, like making out, kissing, grabbing touching. but thats it. no penetration or stripping.
while the MC has total control to end it when he want.
Mine as well, see my other post where I stated that Patreon is perfectly fine in my eyes kicking a game off which does not adhere to their statutes.Right of property, prima facie, gives right to exclusion from property.
If I own a mall I may well ban certain petitioners from setting up shop in my mall, afforded with some digression.
If I own a website, I may choose, again, afforded with digression, to not tolerate certain contents being displayed.
Arguing for non-compliance seems an intellectual non-starter, one ought to, instead, argue for possible alternatives, within the confines of lawfulness.
Such, at least, is my understanding.
The post you quoted was about another aspect however, somebody telling on this game just because he did not like how it developed. Note that this scenario is just an assumption put forward by some people and not known fact. But if this assumption holds, somebody was telling just out of spite, not out of actual interest in the wrongdoings. And that is (or would be) in my eyes hypocritical and, as I said, kindergarten level. Patreon acting on that, again, was fine.