- Apr 24, 2017
- 53
- 84
Not different at all, if you play last chapter you hear that Cass to have her own excuses of why she do this shit to MC. So in her own eyes she think she didn't do anything wrong...Well these are two completely different characters and circumstances. I know Artemis well and the debate around that betrayal. In Artemis, the woman is a bitch and she purposefully manipulate MC to screw him over, resulting in him being depressed, almost killing himself, and having to go over years of therapy to deal with this betrayal. In Artemis, the anger is justified. Not in Follow the Leader. In FtL, there was no betrayal whatsoever. She left because she couldn't do anything else. She didn't manipulate MC to screw him over, she's not a selfish bitch who deserve to get slapped around, and she cares about MC's wellbeing. Therefore, hating her is totally unjustified.
And what if she could have done this and that. Again, she tried but she was afraid. Everything she could have done could have endangered her child. Maybe she could have done something different, maybe she had a chance. Maybe MC risking his life for three girls make him nicer and more heroic than his mother, and a better person. Does that mean she deserves to be hated and rejected ? Again, no. She was afraid not only for herself but also for MC, and she did her best. Even if she could have done something better (which is debattable), it would have been dangerous for her child anyway. So she ran away, hoping the baron would keep the child alive because it was the less dangerous solution for him. And he did keep him alive, so she was right. It is totally different from a burning house. You know with almost certainty that your child will die if you leave him in a burning house. Fire does not care, it's not choosing anything it just burns things. On the other hand, there was a high chance for the baron to keep him alive and under his services because as long as she run away by herself, the baron would consider MC not part of his mother's "betrayal", only another useful tool to keep and use. Maybe if she had tried to run away with him and got caught in the end, that would have been worse for him.
So yeah, she was justified in her actions, she was motivated by fear of not only her own life but also her child's (unlike in Artemis where Cass is only motivated by her own selfish agenda, to stay in this comparison). Therefore, the blame of everything goes to the baron for being an asshole to begin with and the mother does not deserve to be hated, especially since she willingly and genuinely helps MC and his girls now because she cares (and probably have regrets for leaving him too).
"She was motivated by fear"and yes she was LUCKY that Baron decided that keep MC alive and it doesn't mean she was right like it was some cunning plan it was pure luck. Again in moment when she need to decide leave child in dangerous situation and run away to save her life or risk it and try to find him she chose run. It's not bad thing in general it bad thing if you try to name himself parent. Cuz Mom or Dad usually go risk their life despite of fear it's just instinct that kicked in. Or if don't than they either don't want this child or it circumstances like in game when MC had non normal origin. He was ordered like spaniel and it can be the reason why she chose what she chose. And to prove what i said author write himself that he didn't do scene of heated conversation cuz it can lead on this woman bad side so she refuse help MC and girls. He write it himself few comment ago and if he mean it like it what her character do in this situation. Then what it tell us about her, that she is no parent MC she just nobody and if you want her help don't get on bad side...
Again i see this debate is pointless we tell each other same arguments and have different approach to them. Maybe in next chap we know full story with who was those connection and all other. And then i see her different but right now i based my opinion on what i see in game and what author said in reply to me.