ffive

Devoted Member
Jun 19, 2022
8,153
19,370
I never saw anything Nicky did as an opening to the dark path for guy.
Err, did you perhaps intend to quote someone else's post? Because this has literally nothing to do with anything i wrote. I never even mentioned the dark path..? (at that point, that is) I was only talking about whether update did anything to change portrayal of Nicki.

I think calling him a loser is a bit of a stretch tbh.
Err, you said yourself that the game portrays Guy going from "kind of a loser to a pillar of community". Kind of a loser is still a loser. :sneaky:

Anyway, i've mentioned it before but when i say it, i don't mean the crypto scam specifically. That can happen to anyone. It's the decade which followed that we get a slice of -- apparently spent on little else than feeling worthless, never trying to do anything beyond clinging to a menial job, always keeping your head down, not developing any social contacts beyond ones you're forced to interact with at work, not achieving anything until a miraculous stroke of luck (which was all someone else's doing) delivered insane wealth in one's lap, not even self-reflecting on one's own actions ("i'm gonna ghost my only friend because i fear my new money could change the friendship between us". Yeah, like ghosting her for a month isn't already fundamentally changing the nature of your friendship, you dumbass) ... the list goes on and honestly, calling this package a loser isn't a stretch, but being still pretty kind on him. What you said:

a guy who doesn't take any risks because when he did he lost everything.
Is a large part of it, and this is loser's attitude. "I fell over once when walking, so i'll spend the rest of my life never walking because, imagine it, i could fall over again".

Funnily, it's Guy's interaction with his newly hired lawyer that was sort of the last straw -- i mean, all things considered you'd kind of expect to have some options/reactions at that point. The "Light Side" Guy would maybe try to question at least a little all that nihilism he's being served; and the Dark Guy might appreciate the cynicism, but if he's supposed to be to be a misogynist incel creep, then perhaps with his new wealth he'd push back on getting so clearly patronized by his new female employee. But no. Regardless of his supposed nature, the only thing Guy can do there is to dutifully nod his little head without even any thought. I doubt it was intended, but it's like an end-bracket on his whole loser arc -- "man, just look at you; you're 10 years older and in all that time you've learnt nothing. You can still only buy wholesale and swallow whatever bullshit you're fed by a charismatic asshole."

Again, i don't think it was intended this way. But the lack of intent didn't change the unfavorable impression it made.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ename144

9ssmith9

New Member
May 23, 2018
4
8
I don't buy the justification thing, but I do think there's one thing that got lost a bit in the new update, which is ambiguity in Nicki's character. In the original game, she went to Guy to ask him for help and Brent pushed her to play on his crush to get the money. That part is just text. The question you can ask yourself is whether Nicki intended to do that. Was she just going to ask Guy for money and that's it, or did she go in there intending to seduce him for it? Was she willing to exploit his crush anyway or would she only do it because she was desperate and in fear of her life? There wasn't text in the first chapter that provided a definitive answer to that question. People could think about it and come up with their own answer. It seems like in the new version that ambiguity is mostly gone. And that isn't wrong, especially since it seems from what Neon has said like it might have been unintentional in the first place. He can and should write the story in the way that seems best to him. But it makes sense that some people might be mourning that ambiguity if it was something they enjoyed.

When I think about Guy and money, the person I actually think about first is Notch, the Minecraft guy. He was a mostly regular person until he suddenly got super rich from selling Minecraft to Microsoft. And then, almost overnight, he turned into a colossal asshole that pretty much everyone hates. Did it really change him that much, inside? It seems more like he was always that way, but kept it in check so he could live with people and sell his game, but as soon as he didn't need to do that anymore the mask came off. Money gives you options that you didn't have before, and in this shitty world it makes you at least partly immune to the consequences of your actions. Dark Guy, either the full rapey version or the version that "only" blackmails and bribes people, feels like a real character because that's exactly what happens to some people when they get rich.

Worth noting, in the long form interview An Evening with an Extraordinary Gentleman, Alan Moore was asked why this event transpired as it did. His reply? “I don’t know, it just seemed like what he’d do at the time.”
I'm not a smart guy and I don't think I could come up with a good reason for him doing this, but I agree with Moore. It would have felt wrong for him to do it the other way. Sometimes you just have to feel your way through this stuff.
 

Ragnar

Super User
Respected User
Former Staff
Aug 5, 2016
5,288
14,852
Err, did you perhaps intend to quote someone else's post? Because this has literally nothing to do with anything i wrote. I never even mentioned the dark path..? (at that point, that is) I was only talking about whether update did anything to change portrayal of Nicki.


Err, you said yourself that the game portrays Guy going from "kind of a loser to a pillar of community". Kind of a loser is still a loser. :sneaky:

Anyway, i've mentioned it before but when i say it, i don't mean the crypto scam specifically. That can happen to anyone. It's the decade which followed that we get a slice of -- apparently spent on little else than feeling worthless, never trying to do anything beyond clinging to a menial job, always keeping your head down, not developing any social contacts beyond ones you're forced to interact with at work, not achieving anything until a miraculous stroke of luck (which was all someone else's doing) delivered insane wealth in one's lap, not even self-reflecting on one's own actions ("i'm gonna ghost my only friend because i fear my new money could change the friendship between us". Yeah, like ghosting her for a month isn't already fundamentally changing the nature of your friendship, you dumbass) ... the list goes on and honestly, calling this package a loser isn't a stretch, but being still pretty kind on him. What you said:


Is a large part of it, and this is loser's attitude. "I fell over once when walking, so i'll spend the rest of my life never walking because, imagine it, i could fall over again".

Funnily, it's Guy's interaction with his newly hired lawyer that was sort of the last straw -- i mean, all things considered you'd kind of expect to have some options/reactions at that point. The "Light Side" Guy would maybe try to question at least a little all that nihilism he's being served; and the Dark Guy might appreciate the cynicism, but if he's supposed to be to be a misogynist incel creep, then perhaps with his new wealth he'd push back on getting so clearly patronized by his new female employee. But no. Regardless of his supposed nature, the only thing Guy can do there is to dutifully nod his little head without even any thought. I doubt it was intended, but it's like an end-bracket on his whole loser arc -- "man, just look at you; you're 10 years older and in all that time you've learnt nothing. You can still only buy wholesale and swallow whatever bullshit you're fed by a charismatic asshole."

Again, i don't think it was intended this way. But the lack of intent didn't change the unfavorable impression it made.
Yes, I said he's kind of a loser but you can fall way more than Guy's did. In any case my point was mere semantic.
He's been ten years stuck in menial jobs like many people are irl. I mean only a few ones turn into a self made millionaire.
He have learned many things in all those years, he talks about it in later episodes like during Ashe's date.
 
  • Like
Reactions: prpa

ffive

Devoted Member
Jun 19, 2022
8,153
19,370
He have learned many things in all those years, he talks about it in later episodes like during Ashe's date.
Hmm i was under impression that the things he talks about during Ashe's date were his new experiences during the training montage between Chapters 1 and 2?

The things he learned over 10 years of menial jobs were more like how to refill a drink tank without spilling it all over himself, and other such practicalities of said menial jobs -- this comes up in his talk with Brittani if you visit her workplace.

Maybe i remember it wrong, though.
 

Ragnar

Super User
Respected User
Former Staff
Aug 5, 2016
5,288
14,852
Hmm i was under impression that the things he talks about during Ashe's date were his new experiences during the training montage between Chapters 1 and 2?

The things he learned over 10 years of menial jobs were more like how to refill a drink tank without spilling it all over himself, and other such practicalities of said menial jobs -- this comes up in his talk with Brittani if you visit her workplace.

Maybe i remember it wrong, though.
That's in the air, we don't know about Guy past in detail.
 

PHIL101-YYouPPHard

Well-Known Member
Jan 11, 2022
1,045
2,083
It certainly can make for a good character arc, but that's not really where the story goes, at least in the current version. This is not to say he's somehow out of character in the intro, or that the scene should be removed or reworked or anything else along those lines, just that it creates an expectation that Guy will continue to be easily influenced in the main game and/or that his story arc will examine how and why he moves away from that mindset. Right now, in the actual game neither of those things really happen. I believe the first impression the player gets should something more important to the story and/or to understanding Guy's character, though I also don't think it's a huge deal either way. You could argue that the scene where Guy gambles away his money and loses is critically important to understanding his circumstances and the overall plot, but as it's written now I think it puts a bit more emphasis on what caused him to buy into Kobalt Koin rather than the consequences of his decision (that part comes afterward).
Like I said, I haven't played the new chp 1 yet, so my impression is probably off (I'm very confident I will like it, though.) But, basically, he gets duped by crypto scam -> loses all his money -> it crushes his soul for many years, informs his entire perspective on life and himself, aka he loses his mojo -> oh shit, turns out he's fucking lucky and got all his money back plus way, way, way more -> he regains his mojo again and now he feels like the sky is the limit, and it informs the rest of the game going forward.

All that happens between the new Chp 1 and Chp 2, right? So, I'm misunderstanding where the issue is. He's more competent now because 1) his past experience getting duped and all the years he's had to think about it, 2) he's older and wiser, 3) he has way more confidence in himself and his own judgment. Again, this kind of thing, usually in far less dramatic and life-ruining/life-making circumstances, happens to people all the time. And I think it's a very relatable character arc, just far more exciting and magical for Guy than most of the rest of us.

Indeed. That's the problem with the new Nicki. She's a stereotypical character, a flawless Mary Sue. She's one-dimensional and without edges. She presents no conflicts. And she's not interesting as a character. She's downright boring. Will her conflicts and edges be presented later? Maybe. But right now she's a very weak character.

Something, by the way, that already happened with Ashe in Chapter 2, and which was also criticized at the time.
What about Viola? Don't most people in this thread love Viola? And she's by far the most flawless, innocent character so far... nothing wrong really with that type of character, especially in a VN. In fact, people will bitch and moan left and right if a LI isn't a perfect angel, and apparently people will bitch and moan about the opposite, too. Ay ay ay, devs just can't win :ROFLMAO:

Some girls really are kinda like that, though, and even if they aren't, it's a fun fantasy for guys. So, really, it's nice to have a good variety. Nicki still has plenty of flaws. And honestly, I'd argue Ashe's flaws are definitely there, too, they maybe are just obscured by her bubbly personality and the awesome erotic scenes she has. They're slowly getting revealed more and more as the game moves forward. I bet the same will happen for Viola, too.

I'm not a smart guy and I don't think I could come up with a good reason for him doing this, but I agree with Moore. It would have felt wrong for him to do it the other way. Sometimes you just have to feel your way through this stuff.
I think Neon is agreeing with Moore, not criticizing him. A lot of writing comes from the heart and the gut and is based on feelings, not the brain and logical reasoning. Obviously, you need a certain amount of the latter to make an engrossing, believable story and characters, and it also depends on what kind of story you're writing, but... I don't think most writers are panicking to make every tiny little thing fit into some perfectly logical overarching system, or a 1:1 with reality, or to even make sense fully; I think that's an endless task that would quickly drain all the fun away from the endeavor, especially if it makes the story/characters less cool or compelling in the end.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ragnar

Jarulf

Well-Known Member
Aug 9, 2020
1,515
2,742
I just realised:
I'm the bad Guy, duh
I'm the bad Guy.

I will neither confirm nor deny that I only logged on to get that out of my system. Sorry.
 
  • Yay, update!
Reactions: armond

DefaultNK

Newbie
Oct 29, 2017
21
82
We see that the MC bought into Kobalt's cult of personality pretty hard, to the point he's still bitter about the guy ten years later. That suggests he had been following Kobalt for some time before that decision, which calls his overall judgement into question.
I know this isn't really your main point, but no, absolutely nothing about Guy's reaction to the sign suggests that. He's unambiguously bitter about having thrown away all of his savings, why would he not also be mad at the guy who drove him to make that decision?

All that happens between the new Chp 1 and Chp 2, right? So, I'm misunderstanding where the issue is. He's more competent now because 1) his past experience getting duped and all the years he's had to think about it, 2) he's older and wiser, 3) he has way more confidence in himself and his own judgment. Again, this kind of thing, usually in far less dramatic and life-ruining/life-making circumstances, happens to people all the time. And I think it's a very relatable character arc, just far more exciting and magical for Guy than most of the rest of us.
Guy does not actually undergo any kind of character arc to get over his gullibility at any point in the story, and in fact he doesn't need to. Being especially gullible isn't really a character trait Guy has in the first place. And yes, I realize my last post said "it's not like I'm saying Guy was acting out of character in the intro" but I was lying and he actually was. I was worried that saying Guy was acting out of character would make it sound like I was suggesting that the scene should be removed, tried to preemptively clarify that I don't feel that way, and ended up botching the phrasing really badly.

What about Viola? Don't most people in this thread love Viola? And she's by far the most flawless, innocent character so far... nothing wrong really with that type of character, especially in a VN.
Viola is Russian (unjustified military invader) and deserves to be raped (I support the brave warriors who defend the sovereign nation of Ukraine).
 

ename144

Engaged Member
Sep 20, 2018
3,596
14,767
Thats a bit of a contraditon right there.

I am willing to concede the MC could in theory fritter it away frivolous toys... but come on New Scams?.
To fall for any scam requires a willingness by the MC to take risk's.
And in you own words the MC is now risk averse.
You can't have it both ways either he's risk averse or he's not.
Just Sayin.
There are scams that don't rely on pressuring the mark to do something risky. As a less than random example, we know for a fact the MC hired a lawyer; how exactly did he vet her?

If the MC's letting her handle his legal affairs, he's obviously taking some level of risk that she isn't going to con him. Seeing him struggle with that decision could have been a nice way to show the MC starting to grow his much needed backbone. Instead we just skip over the crucial moment and imply the MC is still incapable of decision making, he just somehow lucked into the right drill sergeant.


I know this isn't really your main point, but no, absolutely nothing about Guy's reaction to the sign suggests that. He's unambiguously bitter about having thrown away all of his savings, why would he not also be mad at the guy who drove him to make that decision?
Because if the MC didn't buy into the cult and this was just a random drunk-spending-spree that happened to invest in Kobalt, than there's very little reason to be so fixated on Kobalt all those years later. The guy would be merely a symptom, not the root cause.

Now, I suppose you could argue that the MC might subconsciously transfer his anger at himself onto Kobalt and swear unending retribution at him over a comparatively minor offense, but I've been assured that kind of thing can't happen and the MC would just act randomly in that case. :p

Guy does not actually undergo any kind of character arc to get over his gullibility at any point in the story, and in fact he doesn't need to. Being especially gullible isn't really a character trait Guy has in the first place. And yes, I realize my last post said "it's not like I'm saying Guy was acting out of character in the intro" but I was lying and he actually was. I was worried that saying Guy was acting out of character would make it sound like I was suggesting that the scene should be removed, tried to preemptively clarify that I don't feel that way, and ended up botching the phrasing really badly.
Sorry, I disagree. When game starts by establishing that the MC fell hard for a boilerplate scam, then spent the next decade utterly and completely unable to take actions for fear of getting conned again, the game has clearly established that the MC starts out as gullible - or at least so clueless as to be incapable of sound decision making. That's not to say he couldn't grow beyond that introduction, but character arc is precisely the tool needed to show the growth.
 
4.60 star(s) 226 Votes