I feel like age has a lot to do with it, as I was the same in my teens and 20s. What I was after in writing and cinema was just.. honestly, simpler (action, sexy chicks, etc.) and I didn't pay too much attention to finer details (logic, structure, dialogue, and so on). Once you start consuming classics or objectively well-written works and also reading and listening to worthwhile critics (who know what they're talking about) go into detail about why a work was in fact compelling or else failed to compel, then you really start to pick up on things you weren't noticing before and inevitably comparing them (by 'objectively well-written', I don't necessarily mean that everyone will personally love it or anything, just that the technical writing and execution is undeniably good). And then you get spoiled for quality and there's no going back after that, really; that's when the cynicism kicks in and everything just starts looking like shit and everyone who has to hear you whine about it thinks you're a snob or w/e
If that's not your case btw, if you're in fact older and still feel the way you do, there's nothing wrong about your viewpoint or anything, hope I'm not coming off as implying otherwise. Hell, I still enjoy schlocky shit like
13 Ghosts and universally panned films like
The Men Who Stare at Goats, so obviously it ultimately just comes down to personal taste. But, in general, I think what I've said above rings true for most people.
Anyways, long-story short, I think
Friends in Need is ultimately going to become a VN classic. Maybe it'll never be the most popular (which sucks, as quality
≠ profits necessarily), but I feel the writing is undeniably a cut above the competition.