With all due respect and no offence ment but as far as I can see its not the fact you asked quetions more you ask an already answered question after the Dev answered you first time?.
Example:
Is netori possible? Instead of sharing, Can my MC really cuck BBC and steal his wife from his friend? And for that, the sharing scene in this update is necessary to play or we can steal her without sharing too?
They are valid questions.
basicaly about the same thing Stealing but they could be seen as diffrent questions.
The Dev then responds with.
I don't have plans to have the MC steal Lindsay for himself. To put it simply my basic outline in the near future has MC getting "closer" with Sarah in both the good and bad paths until a point is reached where a monogamous or semi-open relationship is formed. Until then the player has the choice to continue the unspecified sexual relationship (up to players imagination) with Lindsay or turn down each advance/opportunity. I don't want to spoil anything so I won't go into specifics but that should give you a basic idea of if you think it's for you or not.
Answere:
"I don't have plans to have the MC steal Lindsay for himself."
Although a somewhat general answere rather than a specific one with reguards to your exact questions none the less It do's answere them.
So, if we are not okay with sharing, lindsey is not available at all for the whole game? There is only sarah for us? And If I say "no" for the first time sharing, what's the point of that cuckold couple asking MC again in next update that he is okay with sharing? If MC is not okay for the first time, then probably he is not okay for second time too. And also, are there any main Lis along with Sarah? As Lindsey is just for the ntr/sharing fans and not a Li at all. Because, I'm not much into sarah. I liked Lindsey more than sarah.
Now this is were you ask what was already answere'd the only different question I can see being
"There is only sarah for us?"
Then you spoil it again but asking another one Dev already answered which is this one "
And If I say "no" for the first time sharing, what's the point of that cuckold couple asking MC again in next update that he is okay with sharing? If MC is not okay for the first time, then probably he is not okay for second time too."
Answere
"Until then the player has the choice to continue the unspecified sexual relationship (up to players imagination) with Lindsay or turn down each advance/opportunity."
And I'm guessing mind you but most players may turn down a threesome however that dosn't mean they would automatically turn down her on her own.
Infact chances that the player will still say no again in that situation I would sugest has droped from "No way in hell" to "Go on then why not" or even "Yes please i'll have me some of that" for alot of players.
There is such a thing as changing ones mind.
Then you pretty much repeat
"There is only sarah for us?" with
"are there any main Lis along with Sarah?" which is roughly the same thing worded difrently.
And its about the only question you have asked that the Dev Hasn't answered as far as I can tell.
logic says since any sex with Lindsay with or without her husbands presence but with his concent is still technically still only sharing.
So lets clarify shall we Lindsey is sharing and nothing to do with NTR that was definitely clarified by the Dev answere's.
Again no offence and i'm not trying to defend the Dev or Averon1974.
or trying to have a go at you but it needs saying that when someone / anyone asks the same questions however differently frazed more than once in the same thred It can and do's get a little anoying.
Just Sayin.
