In the first image is where the gallery is, literally inside MC's room, in the second image is where there should be a red ball and clicking on it unlocks all the scenes in the gallery, but if this ball doesn't appear for you, just download my save and play it in the www folder, which already has everything unlocked.
The change happened around the same time when the Corrupted Kingdom patreon page went under review due to the presence of kids in the game. No sexual interaction happened with said kids, they were the children you had with each member of the harem and you could visit them at the daycare or go out with them and respective mother for some wholesome time. But patreon said no kids in a porn game and blasted the dev for that who only had 2 choices: leave patreon or remove the kids.
That's the excuse the Corrupted Kingdom dev used but it's unlikely to be the reason why he got thrown away. Plenty of other games have kids in them and no problem, the problem with his game is that the MC uses Mind Control on basically all the girls. And patreon made a new rule about consent at the same time as the children stuff, where they explain a few different views on that, basically for them mind control counts as rape cause the person isn't themselves when they agree thus did not "really" give consent, and that's most likely why he got kicked off. I know it's stupid cause there are also other games with rape on patreon, but yeah Corrupted Kingdoms was huge, and thus easily on the radar.
I don't want to repeat myself but I just gave up and accepted new devs will want to do taboo content, patreon will warn them and then they will cancel the taboo content. And that's just life.
patreon has a much wider reach and many people don't even know its a thing or don't want to use subscribestar.
But shouldn't there be other points to be taken into consideration, such as how much of a percentage the site or app receives from the creator's earnings (I don't believe that these are really free posts, after all the author/developer makes money from this, but I don't know because I don't know them and I don't even have an account there.) and of course visibility is important, but I believe that rules that make your work difficult should also be taken into consideration.
What does "reach" even mean for a site like patreon? It's not like people are going to patreon to search for people to back. Patreon itself has no presence or reach, it's just a site that people link to to get paid. The creator is what drives traffic to the pay site, not the other way around. It doesn't actually matter what site the creator is sending people to, it could be patreon, subscribestar, some completely new alternative, anyone who's willing to pay money to support the project is gonna do so regardless. I genuinely never understood why people had the perception that the specific site you used mattered from any sort of "brand recognition" standpoint, creators should NOT be giving patreon the kind of power they do by assuming people care (obviously if the contracts are better that's a different story, but if people are constantly getting kicked off anyways that's kind of a moot point).
Or not an actual sister, but more like adopted. Just like the relation between the MC/GF and their moms.
Sorry buddy, I don't remember how I did that, but I do remember I had to retry a few times.
Reach as in patreon is way more widely used by many more users. Its a lot more common for people to already have a patreon account or be famillar with the platform through their favorite content creators. In addition Subscribestar has had multiple smear campaigns against it because it doesn't ban certain content or creators. Subscribestar also has no paypal support while patreon does. These two last points can make the site seem sketchy to some users or outright make them refuse to use it.
