If you have 0.9, then that's the limit of that version; if you have 0.10 I don't know.I'm stuck here. I can't get a tutoring lession from Veronica. Any idea how to unlock this quest?
I've already completed Adam and Zoe quest.View attachment 223754 View attachment 223749 View attachment 223750 View attachment 223748
- Thread starter 7767
- Start date
- May 28, 2017
- 2,281
- 13,112
You must be registered to see the links
Living room at midnight
********
DS is seriously trolling all those hoping he'd continue with BB. We're getting all the BB characters back in Glamour, except the part where they won't be related and their story will be rebooted from the beginning and retold in a different way. When he announces Alice and Lisa and Max are "childhood friends" and Anne is their landlord, break out the popcorn.
- Jun 9, 2017
- 234
- 441
Him announcing that would make his patrons quit on him, not all but it would have same effect like diablo immortal announcement did. Only people who came for Glamour will stay and others just gonna ditch DS.. Him bringing BB characters to Glamour will be a huge waste of time.
You must be registered to see the links
Living room at midnight
********
DS is seriously trolling all those hoping he'd continue with BB. We're getting all the BB characters back in Glamour, except the part where they won't be related and their story will be rebooted from the beginning and retold in a different way. When he announces Alice and Lisa and Max are "childhood friends" and Anne is their landlord, break out the popcorn.
- May 28, 2017
- 2,281
- 13,112
BB characters were in Glamour from the start. Alice was Kate's classmate in v.1 and their first conversations alluded to the events in Big Brother, then Lisa became a major character by v.4 or .5. From the very beginning Glamour was always going to explore the further adventures of Alice, Lisa, and Anne. Then in v.6 or 7 DS changed Julia and Kate's relationship from sisters to "friends" because of Patreon's rules, and I'm sure he'll do it for Max's family, and then the pitchforks will really come out.
- Apr 8, 2018
- 175
- 74
- Jun 9, 2017
- 234
- 441
- May 28, 2017
- 4,371
- 13,335
I think he will get away with it. Has there even been a game that took a hit in support just because of conforming to Patreon's rules?
- Apr 8, 2018
- 175
- 74
- Mar 4, 2017
- 693
- 1,148
My heart is bleeding. I was subbed to DS when BB was alive, and all this remake, and destruction of BB to make it work in Glamour is tragic. But I had a feeling when it was announced that Alice would be in this game, and then Lisa showed up and that just sealed it. Unless DS manage to pull something out of this world to fix this. I for one will never sub again. Time will tell.
You must be registered to see the links
Living room at midnight
********
DS is seriously trolling all those hoping he'd continue with BB. We're getting all the BB characters back in Glamour, except the part where they won't be related and their story will be rebooted from the beginning and retold in a different way. When he announces Alice and Lisa and Max are "childhood friends" and Anne is their landlord, break out the popcorn.
- Nov 10, 2017
- 466
- 1,015
I was a huge fan of BB, but honestly people are making a bigger deal out of this than necessary IMO. I'm happy to see the BB characters back in Glamour. I don't mind if the story gets altered a bit, but I don't think it will be big changes. Also, I know they're related so if the actual relationships don't get mentioned anywhere in the game, I wouldn't mind since I know they're related.
You must be registered to see the links
Living room at midnight
********
DS is seriously trolling all those hoping he'd continue with BB. We're getting all the BB characters back in Glamour, except the part where they won't be related and their story will be rebooted from the beginning and retold in a different way. When he announces Alice and Lisa and Max are "childhood friends" and Anne is their landlord, break out the popcorn.
- Jun 9, 2017
- 234
- 441
As long as he doesn't mention their relationship it's gonna be fine, if he does and it isn't the same as it was in BB then what's the point of them being from BB?
- Nov 10, 2017
- 466
- 1,015
You should read between the lines. The game is developed in a way, in which everything important is... very close, but not really here. It is based on "we all know what it is" sheme. And cause of patroneon rules - that is the only way. But if you think that one day there will be no unoficial path... well, you will be mistaken
.
- May 28, 2017
- 2,281
- 13,112
I didn't mean to imply reasonable people would object
.Personally, I'm looking forward to how things play out. It's just that, once the old BB crowd realizes BB is being rebooted within Glamour, with the offline version freely pirated, this thread could get... interesting....
I understood almost nothing (English is not my native, and the google-translator more or less translates only literary text without jargon, grammatical errors and typos). But thanks anyway for trying to help.
yeah grind in this kind of games (porn games) makes no sense, triggers and variables are fine i dont mind them. But when we have to grind and play this game for hours for minor pictures or no progress at all its not even fun to play. better i play games like skyrim, witcher 3, stellaris in that time. Porn games will never have the content those games can provide so dont drag us away with mindless grind. Either do two options like grind option and a cheated nearly no grind option. Make a poll what people prefer.
- Mar 4, 2017
- 693
- 1,148
I for one do not like remakes in general, movies, series, or games. I have not played the original Glamour so I won't say anything about that. But what usually happens with remakes is that things get changed. And many times for the worse, and IMO this sounds for the worse to me. No matter how pretty it will be, as long as it does not stay true to the original then it's no bueno for me. But like I said, we have to see what DS does. He has a chance to change my mind. Good or bad, time will tell.
- Jan 29, 2018
- 831
- 971