- Jan 3, 2018
- 4,915
- 10,316
Whilst I agree with your general point, it's only a valid criticism if the item under critique ever presented itself as being such.This again....
The lack of an over-arching story is a very valid criticism for something that styles itself a type of novel.
Do the reviews here equate to money in the dev's pocket, or what? Do y'all have a sense of personal ownership of this project and feel a need to constantly defend it?
I fucking LOVE this serialized-romp... but break down the acts for me. Where is the hero's journey? something?! anything!?
its just a romp of fuck to fuck to fuck to fuck. it works for me, but it is totally a vaild critisicm. And the bullying of other opinions here is... saddening.
It doesn't "style itself a type of novel", that's just the generic genre these games fall into. It's not self applied.
This game does not & has not ever attempted to be a complex story, it's more akin to a soap opera.
So criticising it for lacking story is an invalid criticism.
It's similar to me picking up a child's toy, then complaining that it's not complex enough for adults.
It's not supposed to be. It never claimed to be.
This criticism is simply a result of the reviewer not managing their own expectations particularly well.
That is user error, not a fault with the game.
As you say, you enjoy this game for what it is. The people criticising it for what it's not, are totally missing the point.
There is nothing wrong with presenting facts to steer them towards it.
Last edited: