WTF is Jamila, a Muslim woman conservative enough to wear a hijab in public, doing eating oysters? absolutely_haram.jpg
- Thread starter MoonBox
- Start date
-
- Tags
- 3dcg ahegao anal sex big ass big tits cheating cosplay creampie female domination footjob groping group sex handjob harem humor interracial lactation lesbian male domination male protagonist masturbation milf mobile game multiple penetration oral sex pov pregnancy prostitution romance sex toys spanking teasing titfuck urination vaginal sex virgin
I like how the updates are about 2 to 3 little stories each and ends with them sleeping
- Jan 7, 2022
- 4,620
- 14,686
Probably why she never had tried them before... and she's leaving the conservative slip away a bit each day... What do you know... People are able to evolve and recover from religious brainwashing. Imagine that... wow.
Peace
- Oct 16, 2022
- 572
- 1,081
- Jul 13, 2018
- 1,146
- 3,544
- Jan 7, 2022
- 4,620
- 14,686
I have enjoyed this game from the beginning. Especially the humorous dialogue. The highlight being the trip with his Aunt overseas to see her at work and keep her company that climaxes with the "El Pene Del Diablo" scene. I literally laughed out loud for days after seeing that one. As more LI's were added as notches on the MC's belt the story took a turn and began to drag. Too many LI's to keep track of and spend time with is hard to follow. The story needs to be wrapped up and come to a close IMO.
- Jun 22, 2019
- 1,361
- 1,636
- Sep 19, 2022
- 19
- 16
Well, I concentrate to only play the game and not give a positive review of this quiet well done game. Sorry about that developer.
I have enjoyed this game from the beginning. When I saw the ginger ones, I said "fuck, I'm full in love of the story of course".
I'll wait for the next update. Thanks
I have enjoyed this game from the beginning. When I saw the ginger ones, I said "fuck, I'm full in love of the story of course".
I'll wait for the next update. Thanks
- Mar 15, 2020
- 1,815
- 1,774
Nah. It has to be something else. i personally know that it doesn't cost that much for MEGA. MoonBox Unless they made some recent changes.
- Jun 20, 2022
- 6,029
- 10,036
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content.
Log in or register now.
Last edited:
- Jun 20, 2022
- 6,029
- 10,036
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content.
Log in or register now.
To be fair, there have been TV shows that only lasted 2 seasons of eight episode each for a while. I believe John Cleese's Fawlty Towers dates back to the late 1970s.
I'm not aware of whether it wasn't financially successful enough at the time, or if Cleese just wanted to move on to other things.
Some shows are written as what amounts to a tight weave of stories (or story) without really having room for episodes by a larger selection of writers (The Flight Attendant comes to mind; Game of Thrones qualifies as well, as it was based on a series of books (albeit one that is even now incomplete))
Most of my favorite shows are designed to tell many stories following the same basic format, involving a consistent cast of characters that may have on-going storylines involving them that are usually in the background. I'm thinking of Law & Order, Law & Order: SVU, Law & Order: Criminal Intent; the NCIS shows; the CSI shows; Dick Wolf's FBI shows. However, despite my love of police procedural, I've enjoyed other shows with similar formats. WKRP in Cincinnati, M*A*S*H, Moonlighting (though that involved a bit more story to story continuity in its later seasons, and (i believe) was hampered from completing a full slate of episodes from due to cast issues, more than money or story issues).
I'd be inclined to say that limited season runs and season-long arcs tended to show up strongly when cable channels started making their own shows. The on-going nature of the storyline would drive involvement (where missing any one episode of Law & Order wouldn't be likely to make it confusing to watch the next); limited episode counts would mean that you could pay for fewer episodes, and still have the episodes you pay for showing up in November, February, May, or August (the months where the Neilson organization (possibly Arbitron too) assess the viewership of shows to help set advertising rates).
Please note this analysis of TV trends was tossed together in a few minutes (though based on thoughts I've had for much longer), is pretty much based almost exclusively on American shows, and is limited to shows I've watched; and, of course, is my opinion only.
- May 11, 2020
- 9,967
- 14,925
- Jun 20, 2022
- 6,029
- 10,036
Okay FatGiant, I have to ask. Are you sad at the existence of the idea, or that Moon might actually consider it?
Oh no! You've opened a Reverse Snickers! If you eat it, you'll be hungrier and grouchier!Need a
?
Without knowing how often the women involved are having sex, it's hard to know the actual percentages are correct. A women having no sex in a given four-week period is going to have pretty much a 0% chance of becoming pregnant. Are all women presumed to be having the same amount of sex? A single woman in her 40s might be having sex much less often than a 25-year-old, which could account for the difference.
That said, even having sex at least once a day, there's not a 100% chance of getting pregnant. Heck, that could be the assumption in the chart, for all I know.
And the women in this VN are not having sex with the MC once a day. I think the average over the (roughly) three month period for the side girls is at most twice. Heck, I'm pretty sure Liz and Cat are at most 4-5 times (counting multiple rounds in a 24-hour period as a single incident).
Last edited:
- May 11, 2020
- 9,967
- 14,925
In which reality ?? sorry, or the women I met, were sluts (well yeah , they were, not that I complain)
Last edited: