D
Deleted member 2767565
Guest
Guest
Hang on a minute...
Yes, I think the matching of brother and sister was rigged and that feeling is bolstered by the mentality and attitude shown by the rest of the party group when the matchup first appeared and subsequently became (or was engineered to become) unavoidable.
Yes, I think the brother and sister were unrealistically naive in not considering the possibility at least of that outcome actually occurring.
But nevertheless, I think the final act of the evening between brother and sister was very well developed in that they had both started the evening with an anticipation of sexual encounter, they had both had a significant amount to drink and they, of course, were later even further aroused by what was going on around them. Though they were both aware and reluctant to engage in it themselves, the sister was clearly psychologically and emotionally coerced (peer-pressured) by her friend into producing some form of physical compromise.
The hand-job, though initially halting and intended to be no more than a token act to satisfy the challenge of her "friend", became, lubricated by the focus and the inebriation, the trigger in the sister for the elevated state of arousal, the more compulsive, irresistible drive to rut, to take over and brush aside any rational barriers that would normally have stemmed the tide, checked the mindless onslaught and prevented "the line" being actually crossed.
I thought that whole intimate sequence between brother and sister was handled (for me at least) perfectly. I thought the minimalistic presentation of the sex mirrored exactly the suddenness of the escalation in the sister's urge and the rawness and immediacy of both her capitulation and her announcement of it as it then smashed down and through the brother's instinctive awareness of its wrongness and his hesitant inhibitions, culminating in their instantaneous surrender to their most basic, animalistic urges which swept the two protagonists away.
Anyway, that was how I saw it... just sayin'.
Yes, I think the matching of brother and sister was rigged and that feeling is bolstered by the mentality and attitude shown by the rest of the party group when the matchup first appeared and subsequently became (or was engineered to become) unavoidable.
Yes, I think the brother and sister were unrealistically naive in not considering the possibility at least of that outcome actually occurring.
But nevertheless, I think the final act of the evening between brother and sister was very well developed in that they had both started the evening with an anticipation of sexual encounter, they had both had a significant amount to drink and they, of course, were later even further aroused by what was going on around them. Though they were both aware and reluctant to engage in it themselves, the sister was clearly psychologically and emotionally coerced (peer-pressured) by her friend into producing some form of physical compromise.
The hand-job, though initially halting and intended to be no more than a token act to satisfy the challenge of her "friend", became, lubricated by the focus and the inebriation, the trigger in the sister for the elevated state of arousal, the more compulsive, irresistible drive to rut, to take over and brush aside any rational barriers that would normally have stemmed the tide, checked the mindless onslaught and prevented "the line" being actually crossed.
I thought that whole intimate sequence between brother and sister was handled (for me at least) perfectly. I thought the minimalistic presentation of the sex mirrored exactly the suddenness of the escalation in the sister's urge and the rawness and immediacy of both her capitulation and her announcement of it as it then smashed down and through the brother's instinctive awareness of its wrongness and his hesitant inhibitions, culminating in their instantaneous surrender to their most basic, animalistic urges which swept the two protagonists away.
Anyway, that was how I saw it... just sayin'.