Semi-identical twins are probably more common but still rare as you need a DNA test to confirm it. And researchers have said that most cases of semi-identical twins are misclassified as either fraternal or identical as some places use an outdated system, less then 75% fraternal and 75% or more identical.Right, but the story also needs to fit the "official" narrative, which is that they're clones. And in that case, the DNA would (or at least should) be identical. Moreover, if they were fraternal, or semi-identical, twins, they'd presumably know, and be able to explain, that fact (and if they were semi-identical, they'd surely know they were one of two known cases of this worldwide). But they don't--they leave it as, "it's weird that we're twins/clones, but her boobs are bigger than mine." It wouldn't be weird if they were fraternal twins; that's just how they are. Semi-identical twins would be weird in that they're extremely rare, but again seems like something they'd know. The fact that they recognize, but can't explain, the incongruity is, well, a little odd.
I mean, the bottom line is, "it's just a game, I should really just relax."
And clones are not perfect copies their probably more closer in terms to semi-identical twins than identical twins especially when dealing with something more complex such as a human.
Last edited: