- Dec 17, 2019
- 669
- 803
Same world. just missing for a bit.wait, if he is died and wake up in a another world, then why is there a incest tag?
or have i misunderstood ?
oh ok i understand now.Same world. just missing for a bit.
I doubt you're still here, but i appreciate your insight and have thought of a stupid easy way to make it optional. so thanks for putting up a stink. i didnt even think about it when i was renderingThere is one scene in Ch2 where there is a gay scene that is unavoidable.
Annnd that's straight to the ignore list.
I don't see how sharing/swinging can be vanilla. In any case, since, if I understand correctly, sharing isn't going to be avoidable, other guys are going to have sex with the LIs, so I have no intention of trying the game to see how it's possible.the sharing of the MC is pretty set. the sharing of the MC's GF is at the moment only some MFF threesome action. on the 'corrupt' path stuff is more volatile in my head, but the 'pure' path still has the sharing, but it is wayyyy more vanilla. my goal is to have 2 to 4 choices each in-game day which you can chose which character/characters to spend time with, mostly so people can see what they want and avoid what they dont want.
No other guy has sex with the GF. and the word "more" is load bearing in the vanilla sentence. i believe you misunderstood something somewhere. the only sharing is the MC to other women (married [corruption path] and single [pure path])I don't see how sharing/swinging can be vanilla. In any case, since, if I understand correctly, sharing isn't going to be avoidable, other guys are going to have sex with the LIs, so I have no intention of trying the game to see how it's possible.
Hhhhmmmm, while technically that is sharing, I don't think I would include the sharing tag in an instance like that. Most people seem to figure sharing is you sharing a LI with other people. You risk losing a large player base by having that tag involved in a way most people don't see it being used.No other guy has sex with the GF. and the word "more" is load bearing in the vanilla sentence. i believe you misunderstood something somewhere. the only sharing is the MC to other women (married [corruption path] and single [pure path])
Is MC's girlfriend his only love interest? Personally, I'm interested to know if the MC can establish a romantic relationship with the girls with which he's going to have sex.No other guy has sex with the GF. and the word "more" is load bearing in the vanilla sentence. i believe you misunderstood something somewhere. the only sharing is the MC to other women (married [corruption path] and single [pure path])
I feel like it is required though just from using prior examples that i stated a few posts ago. I would happily remove it, but i dont want the flipside of "you didnt tell me [x y or z]".Hhhhmmmm, while technically that is sharing, I don't think I would include the sharing tag in an instance like that. Most people seem to figure sharing is you sharing a LI with other people. You risk losing a large player base by having that tag involved in a way most people don't see it being used.
The only love interests come from the pure route of which he is the only one. Those girls will fall in love with him. the corruption route contains nobody who will love the MC and it is purely physical. booty calls, orgys, women all around. as you can prob guess, most of the actual story comes from the pure route's charactersIs MC's girlfriend his only love interest? Personally, I'm interested to know if the MC can establish a romantic relationship with the girls with which he's going to have sex.
In fact, it's common to see the swinging tag as an equivalent of netorase, as Stonerbank has indicated, so reading that it's unavoidable surely many people will come to the same conclusion that I had. I'm not saying you should remove it, but you should definitely make the type of swinging clear in the game description.No other guy has sex with the GF. and the word "more" is load bearing in the vanilla sentence. i believe you misunderstood something somewhere. the only sharing is the MC to other women (married [corruption path] and single [pure path])
I guess I'll try the game on the pure route.The only love interests come from the pure route of which he is the only one. Those girls will fall in love with him. the corruption route contains nobody who will love the MC and it is purely physical. booty calls, orgys, women all around. as you can prob guess, most of the actual story comes from the pure route's characters
I do truly appreciate your input. this is obviously constructive. Would something along the lines of "Note: All sharing is the MC with other women." also please do try the pure route. I will put the scene that has caused contention behind a route indicator with the ability to skip it. In your opinion (as a person more interested in the pure route) would you consider the GF watching in a scene with another LI ok for the pure route? The final scene in the game so far pushes that envelope hard, isn't part of a route, but introduces the anti-hero.In fact, it's common to see the swinging tag as an equivalent of netorase, as Stonerbank has indicated, so reading that it's unavoidable surely many people will come to the same conclusion that I had. I'm not saying you should remove it, but you should definitely make the type of swinging clear in the game description.
I guess I'll try the game on the pure route.
The quickest way to kill a game is to add NTR.First, I have not decided on NTR or not. If it is added it will be AVOIDABLE in an obvious way.
seems like it. Aiight ill toss the idea. makes it easier on me anyway. i can put another character in that would resonate better with the community. thanks for the inputThe quickest way to kill a game is to add NTR.
I guess something like that would be okay.I do truly appreciate your input. this is obviously constructive. Would something along the lines of "Note: All sharing is the MC with other women."
If the girlfriend likes watching the MC having sex with other LIs, it's something that could fit into the pure route. It all depends on how you implement it.also please do try the pure route. I will put the scene that has caused contention behind a route indicator with the ability to skip it. In your opinion (as a person more interested in the pure route) would you consider the GF watching in a scene with another LI ok for the pure route? The final scene in the game so far pushes that envelope hard, isn't part of a route, but introduces the anti-hero.
ps the pure route start update will be clearly marked somewhere. as a greenlight
perfect. I look forward to your criticisms down the line! i can only improve if people are willing to help.I guess something like that would be okay.
If the girlfriend likes watching the MC having sex with other LIs, it's something that could fit into the pure route. It all depends on how you implement it.
WVM doesn't have a sharing tag, haven't played What's Mine Is Yours and Sharing is Caring has a swinging tag specifically for the netorase route and the optional swinging content. It also has a netorare tag for the netorare path. Typically with FxF scenes where both girls are part of the harem it's enough to tag it with lesbian. Exception would be more if the lesbian scene included a girl who wasn't in the harem and wasn't planned to be. Another exception would be a lesbian couple where one of them was sharing their wife with the MC or his girlfriend.I feel like it is required though just from using prior examples that i stated a few posts ago. I would happily remove it, but i dont want the flipside of "you didnt tell me [x y or z]".
umm as per https://f95zone.to/threads/tags-rules-and-list-updated-2024-01-29.10394/ . i think WVM should have a swinging tag if it doesnt. I think ill keep it as it is for now, and see if i want to change it in an update or two. Choosing tags is harder than choosing mobile phaseWVM doesn't have a sharing tag, haven't played What's Mine Is Yours and Sharing is Caring has a swinging tag specifically for the netorase route and the optional swinging content. It also has a netorare tag for the netorare path. Typically with FxF scenes where both girls are part of the harem it's enough to tag it with lesbian. Exception would be more if the lesbian scene included a girl who wasn't in the harem and wasn't planned to be. Another exception would be a lesbian couple where one of them was sharing their wife with the MC or his girlfriend.
Typically though when there's a swinging tag the expectation both for people looking for that content and people looking to avoid it is there'll be either MF swinging content or MMF sex content. For lesbian haters the lesbian tag alone is enough of a warning.
nah the swinging tag wouldn't make any sense in that game because the Main Gf in that game doesn't let MC have sex with other girls but lets him date them so he is in a relationship with multiple women aka in a "harem" relationship. Swinging on hte other hand is one or both of the partners in a committed relationship fuck with whoever for shit and giggles and is pretty much an equally red flag then NTR to me.umm as per https://f95zone.to/threads/tags-rules-and-list-updated-2024-01-29.10394/ . i think WVM should have a swinging tag if it doesnt. I think ill keep it as it is for now, and see if i want to change it in an update or two. Choosing tags is harder than choosing mobile phase
I'll personally say, a slightly more clear way of saying this - based on my understanding of what you're trying to say, after reading through this thread so far - would be something more like "Note: Sharing refers to MC's girlfriend sharing the MC with other women.", and then possibly in Dev Notes, clarifying that "In Pure Route, MC is shared between multiple women (and optional trap)" (and possibly include if any lesbian action between love interests will happen) and "Corruption Route includes netori themes, group sex [and include if said group sex would include other males, and if that would be avoidable], and little-to-no romance."I do truly appreciate your input. this is obviously constructive. Would something along the lines of "Note: All sharing is the MC with other women." also please do try the pure route. I will put the scene that has caused contention behind a route indicator with the ability to skip it. In your opinion (as a person more interested in the pure route) would you consider the GF watching in a scene with another LI ok for the pure route? The final scene in the game so far pushes that envelope hard, isn't part of a route, but introduces the anti-hero.
ps the pure route start update will be clearly marked somewhere. as a greenlight