GarudoSCHE

Member
Dec 16, 2024
331
494
131
I guess I just figured with all this prophecy shit around Elis being basically a borderline "chosen one" type of archetype, and his visions of a goddess and his infamous ancestor talking to him etc etc.

He would at least be able to match the power of a level 5 wizard in DND by now. But who knows, maybe he'll get there eventually.
Well, technically, that's not true. In many editions, level 5 gives access to the third circle of spells, meaning he gains the overpowered Fireball. In the game, he uses simple spells like Fire Hands (fighting alongside the lords in the west) or some minor mind-affecting spells (knocked the woodcutter's axe out of his hands). So, he's level 4 at best there.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hackett Thrail

GibboBtw

Active Member
Jul 7, 2024
673
1,507
172
Well, technically, that's not true. In many editions, level 5 gives access to the third circle of spells, meaning he gains the overpowered Fireball. In the game, he uses simple spells like Fire Hands (fighting alongside the lords in the west) or some minor mind-affecting spells (knocked the woodcutter's axe out of his hands). So, he's level 4 at best there.
What's not true? :ROFLMAO:

That's what I said isn't it?

I expect him, to be able to match the power of a level 5 wizard by now. But he doesn't. So unless I'm missing something, we agree? o_O
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: GarudoSCHE

Sebastian.

New Member
Mar 31, 2023
6
4
62
Heyho everyone.

Chatgpt and I made a little cheat script that can give the player all perks at once.

Warning: This script will modify the game files irreversibly. I am not responsible for any damage this may cause to your saves!


Here is is how it works:

Any time the game wants to check which perk you have chosen it will ask "perk == "something" " or something very similar.

While something then is either "intelligence", "strength" or "mage".

This script searches through all rpy files and replaces it with True.

Meaning that "if perk == "intelligence" " becomes "if True".

Again. This will literally change the games code. Once you apply this you would have to reinstall the game to undo.

I tried to first overwrite the if statements but this just really fucked up the game. Going for the throat is the easiest way.

It should be entirely version independent and also not break the code unless the dev deviates from how they used these perks until now.


Now, obviously, I can't predict that this will never cause an issue because I don't know what the dev will do in relation to such perk checks. But so far, having played this game with URM like 3 times, I can't think of any instance where this would bork the game. I tried to cover all possible syntax comparisons. But if the dev wants to they could still trick me. In the end its just a regex replacement.


How to use:

1. place the rpy file into the /game folder.
2. Run the game and load a save to be sure.
3. Immediately close the game again.
4. Remove BOTH the rpy file and the new rpyc file.
5. Run the game again. It is now modified.


Use at your own risk! I will provide 0 tech support!!! The code is readable in plain within the file.


Python:
init python:
    import os
    import re

    def modify_game_files():
        game_dir = os.path.join(config.basedir, "game")  # Get the game directory
        pattern = re.compile(r'not\s*perk == "([^"]+)"|perk == "([^"]+)"|perk != "([^"]+)"|perk is "([^"]+)"|perk is not "([^"]+)"')  # Match all forms of comparisons

        for root, _, files in os.walk(game_dir):
            for file in files:
                if file.endswith(".rpy"):  # Only modify .rpy files
                    file_path = os.path.join(root, file)

                    with open(file_path, "r", encoding="utf-8") as f:
                        content = f.read()

                    # Replace the matched patterns with 'True'
                    new_content = pattern.sub('True', content)

                    with open(file_path, "w", encoding="utf-8") as f:
                        f.write(new_content)

    modify_game_files()  # Run on game start
Heyho everyone.

Chatgpt and I made a little cheat script that can give the player all perks at once.

Warning: This script will modify the game files irreversibly. I am not responsible for any damage this may cause to your saves!


Here is is how it works:

Any time the game wants to check which perk you have chosen it will ask "perk == "something" " or something very similar.

While something then is either "intelligence", "strength" or "mage".

This script searches through all rpy files and replaces it with True.

Meaning that "if perk == "intelligence" " becomes "if True".

Again. This will literally change the games code. Once you apply this you would have to reinstall the game to undo.

I tried to first overwrite the if statements but this just really fucked up the game. Going for the throat is the easiest way.

It should be entirely version independent and also not break the code unless the dev deviates from how they used these perks until now.


Now, obviously, I can't predict that this will never cause an issue because I don't know what the dev will do in relation to such perk checks. But so far, having played this game with URM like 3 times, I can't think of any instance where this would bork the game. I tried to cover all possible syntax comparisons. But if the dev wants to they could still trick me. In the end its just a regex replacement.


How to use:

1. place the rpy file into the /game folder.
2. Run the game and load a save to be sure.
3. Immediately close the game again.
4. Remove BOTH the rpy file and the new rpyc file.
5. Run the game again. It is now modified.


Use at your own risk! I will provide 0 tech support!!! The code is readable in plain within the file.


Python:
init python:
    import os
    import re

    def modify_game_files():
        game_dir = os.path.join(config.basedir, "game")  # Get the game directory
        pattern = re.compile(r'not\s*perk == "([^"]+)"|perk == "([^"]+)"|perk != "([^"]+)"|perk is "([^"]+)"|perk is not "([^"]+)"')  # Match all forms of comparisons

        for root, _, files in os.walk(game_dir):
            for file in files:
                if file.endswith(".rpy"):  # Only modify .rpy files
                    file_path = os.path.join(root, file)

                    with open(file_path, "r", encoding="utf-8") as f:
                        content = f.read()

                    # Replace the matched patterns with 'True'
                    new_content = pattern.sub('True', content)

                    with open(file_path, "w", encoding="utf-8") as f:
                        f.write(new_content)

    modify_game_files()  # Run on game start

Tell me lad is there a way to apply this cheat script on a mobile version ?
 

Gicoo

Engaged Member
Feb 18, 2018
2,108
5,695
637
Does mage get the least amount of special scenes?
Who's counting, but probably.

The problem is that we got two wives designed around the warrior and scholar personality, but not a third wife who would be a fit for the mage.
At least it adds up regarding the three sisters.
 

Gicoo

Engaged Member
Feb 18, 2018
2,108
5,695
637
The third hidden wife for mage is your sis. :WeSmart:
I get what you saying, but I was already pointing out that the three sisters respond to each of the three classes, while the two wives only respond to two of the three classes.

Warrior: Cass, Isis
Mage: Elin, -
Scholar: Lia, Aurora

Hence mage is slightly lacking compared to warrior and scholar.
 

w123t4

Well-Known Member
May 26, 2019
1,240
1,496
348
I get what you saying, but I was already pointing out that the three sisters respond to each of the three classes, while the two wives only respond to two of the three classes.

Warrior: Cass, Isis
Mage: Elin, -
Scholar: Lia, Aurora

Hence mage is slightly lacking compared to warrior and scholar.
I don't remember any new content for Lia if you are in the bookworm path? :unsure:
 

Gicoo

Engaged Member
Feb 18, 2018
2,108
5,695
637
I don't remember any new content for Lia if you are in the bookworm path? :unsure:
Doctor visit:
If Bookworm MC can agree to examine Lia himself otherwise Ludwig will do it.
Take position of examination: Lia corruption = 1.
Continue: Lia corruption = 2.
If Lia corruption > 0: she asks if you are going to have for more examinations and mentions she
likes the way MC works
Note that I don't mean you have to be in a specific class to court any woman (though some are class locked). But some classes respond better, give access to more scenes, or simply fit the narrative better.
 

GarudoSCHE

Member
Dec 16, 2024
331
494
131
I get what you saying, but I was already pointing out that the three sisters respond to each of the three classes, while the two wives only respond to two of the three classes.

Warrior: Cass, Isis
Mage: Elin, -
Scholar: Lia, Aurora

Hence mage is slightly lacking compared to warrior and scholar.
Alaina has an extra scene if you play as a mage, but it's not particularly impressive.
 
4.60 star(s) 143 Votes