VN Ren'Py In Her Service [v0.81a] [Blue Factory Games]

4.10 star(s) 40 Votes

Baalzie

Member
Aug 18, 2022
229
344
Using the flowchart, having unlocked all, the scene E092B-3 -Iris' decision only shows the exact same as E092B-2 Fiona's Demand.
There's literally no difference in them no difference what choices are made in the scene.

Cannot see the version where Iris gets with "not you".
 

Kagarus

Member
Sep 28, 2017
280
486
In general, I do think that games whose devs release versions within a reasonable timeframe (like with this game) shouldn't be leaked.
However:
The v0.81a available here is (reasonably) safe. I downloaded a version from mixdrop and did a diff between it and the files from the last official version v0.76. None of the code differences are dangerous, so unless there was already attack code within the previous version (extremely unlikely) or the attacker is using a vulnerability in parsing pictures etc (also unlikely, considering the attack profile so far), there's no danger there. (Also, I haven't yet seen a case where the downloaded file from an official filehost here differes between filehosts - uploader users here are responsible for uploading, so far none of the attacks originated from their accounts, and all issues with regards to filehosts involved the filehosts themselves, not the files).
All of which is to say, this version is about as safe to download as the previous ones.

(Reworded a bit, was rather tired yesterday)
 
Last edited:

FurFan

Member
May 4, 2017
153
118
Using the flowchart, having unlocked all, the scene E092B-3 -Iris' decision only shows the exact same as E092B-2 Fiona's Demand.
There's literally no difference in them no difference what choices are made in the scene.

Cannot see the version where Iris gets with "not you".
I can also confirm E092B-3 from the flow chart doesn't show the Iris/General scene. I would recommend reporting this on their bug-report discord channel.
 

Kagarus

Member
Sep 28, 2017
280
486
Yeah it was chrome flagging the host. The file itself checks out, as mods have confirmed. Sorry for the false alarm, but can't be too careful.
Yeah, Chrome (and Firefox, since in the backend they're using the same crap from google) raising false alarms because of their lists are a well-known issue here, and honestly I think they're becoming a net-negative (basically, when you habituate users to click away your security popups because of constant false positives, they'll also be more likely to ignore them when it matters - my worry is that the habit will transfer to some degree to other security measures like the phishing protection).
Easiest way to see if this is the case is to download a copy from the "dangerous" filehoster and another from presumed safe one and compare them (sha256sum, certutil -hashfile) (this doesn't help if someone passed an actual malicious file to the uploaders here, that needs to be caught by the uploaders or by yourself, for example using diffs).

And sorry for being a bit caustic earlier, was operating on way too little sleep. :ROFLMAO:
 
4.10 star(s) 40 Votes