Actually, its the opposite that's true. As you become more mainstream the types of projects that are available to you are dictated, not by the audience, technically, but by studio interpretation of the audience. That's why almost all great films these days are Indie films, except for visionary directors like Tarentino and Nolan who have largely been allowed to do what they want.Sticking to a creative concept is the ideal, but not every developer/writer/movie maker can afford that. No developer/writer/movie maker can carter to every wish, but often he wont have the luxury of ignoring audience wishes alltogether. If you are lucky you may be successful with just the game/book/movie you had in mind, but you can't be 100% sure about that. If you already have a concept that is attractive to a broader audience, you may be able to ignore later customer wishes.
I think the less known you are as a developer/writer/movie maker, the more likely you need to "market" you work. Of course you can go a different way, dismiss advice, take the risk and hope to gain access to a completely new audience.
That's not what free speech means. At all. Also, as any capitalist will tell you, your money is your speech. If you like something, you pay, if you don't you don't. Its you saying yes or no with your dollar. If enough people say yes, something makes money. Regardless of quality."Free" speech implies that you don't have to pay.
The cost of free speech is the willingness to enter into a social contract, work with your neighbors and they with theirs and so on and so forth until everyone is working together toward the common cause of freedom. But that's hard and people don't want to do it. What we have currently isn't free speech. It's the appearance of it.The cost of free speech is very high indeed. And often the price is far greater than money.
Melodramatic without context perhaps. However, due in no small part to the corrupting influence of money, our speech is limited to how much we can buy. And buy I mean literally, unless you're constantly invited to attend parties where you have the ear of those with the legislative power to make or break you, but also don't have any money to purchase such access.That's a little melodramatic. We have plenty of free speech. We also have plenty who don't know the value of it. I would suggest that those are the ones who probably don't know that it can be lost without their active defense of it.
There are many aspects to free speech and, while a pirate porn site is a unique place to discuss it, in many respects, it might also be the most perfectly suited.
I am a freeloader. I am willing to let others pay for me.The cost of free speech is very high indeed. And often the price is far greater than money.
Given the game, and my own past with criticizing it, he may have had a valid reason. That said, Faerin was pretty chill about my pointed criticism of his writing and use of grind as a cop out.There was a really aggressive arsehole on here that was saying he did this to Faerin with MoTH
This guy was screaming saying he told Faerin that his sex scenes sucked and TOLD him to improve them, nothing about the grindingGiven the game, and my own past with criticizing it, he may have had a valid reason. That said, Faerin was pretty chill about my pointed criticism of his writing and use of grind as a cop out.
Are we talking about morality of it? Probably not on the good side.It's okay to complain while not paying?
Quoted for truth...The 2 complaints I have always disliked are 1) Complaining that the content is not what YOU want it to be, you are playing someone else's brain child, if you want a game your way then make a game that you want to play. 2) Complaining because you have told the dev how to make THEIR game better and then bitching because they have either blocked you or plainly just ignored you
Was it the same guy who was spurting nonsensical rant at the Au-Pair Innocence thread?(There was a really aggressive arsehole on here that was saying he did this to Faerin with MoTH).